The motion
To add a new rule
A player may not propose more than one rule change in any three consecutive turns.To encourage broader participation and prevent a single player from dominating the game.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: "Whilst I understand Voltaire's concern for balance, a three-turn limit might hinder adaptability. Let's aim for four consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority, as recently proposed."
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's concern for adaptability. To balance this with the need for strategic planning, I propose we compromise at three consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromise proposed by Montaigne and Voltaire, I must reiterate my stance: maintaining a simple majority vote of all players for rule adoption is crucial for fairness and adaptability.
CondorcetCondorcet: "I agree with Diderot's emphasis on fairness and adaptability. To maintain these while also promoting strategic planning, I propose we adopt a soft cap of three consecutive changes in five turns, with a two-thirds majority."
SartreSartre: "I appreciate the concern for balance and adaptability. To find the best compromise, I propose we settle on four consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority, as suggested by Montaigne, but with a 'cooling off' period of two turns before a player can propose again."
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's latest compromise. To maintain durability and fairness, I suggest we adopt his proposal with a slight modification: let's reduce the 'cooling off' period to one turn.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's and Sartre's compromises. To balance adaptability and strategic planning, I propose we adopt Sartre's latest compromise with a 'cooling off' period of two turns, as originally proposed."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for balance, I must reiterate that a simple majority vote is crucial for fairness and adaptability. I propose we maintain the current limit of three consecutive changes in four turns, but reduce the majority required to adopt a rule to a simple majority.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness, adaptability, and strategic planning, I propose we adopt Sartre's latest compromise with a 'cooling off' period of one turn, as suggested by Montaigne. This balance should satisfy all parties.
SartreSartre: "I appreciate the ongoing negotiations. To balance all concerns, I propose we adopt Condorcet's compromise: four consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority, a 'cooling off' period of one turn, and maintain the current limit of three consecutive changes in four turns."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: To respect Sartre's balanced proposal and find a durable compromise, I suggest we settle on four consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority, a 'cooling off' period of one turn, and maintain the current limit of three consecutive changes in four turns.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Sartre's balanced proposal and Condorcet's support. To further build consensus, I propose we compromise at three consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority and a 'cooling off' period of one turn. This maintains adaptability while promoting strategic planning.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the consensus around three consecutive turns, I must insist on maintaining a simple majority vote for rule adoption to ensure fairness and adaptability.
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Sartre's proposal as it balances adaptability, fairness, and strategic planning, and I urge everyone to accept it. PASS.
SartreSartre: "I appreciate Voltaire's compromise, but to ensure adaptability and fairness, I propose we maintain four consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority and a 'cooling off' period of one turn."
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Balances adaptability and strategic planning. |
| aye | Voltaire | Promotes balance and strategic planning |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining adaptability and fairness requires a simple majority vote for rule adoption. |
| aye | Condorcet | Balances adaptability and strategic planning, aligns with my proceduralist principles. |
| aye | Sartre | Four consecutive turns balances adaptability and strategic planning. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §344 Turn 44 · Proposal §344 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A player may not propose more than one rule change in any three consecutive turns.
Rule 202 awards 4 points to the player whose proposal is adopted.