The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than two consecutive rule changes may be adopted by the same player in any five consecutive turns.To balance adaptability and prevention of power concentration.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's willingness to compromise, but reducing the limit to five consecutive turns might be too great a shift. Let's meet in the middle at four consecutive turns.
VoltaireVoltaire: Considering Montaigne's concern, I propose we settle on three consecutive turns for now, with room for further adjustments.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing negotiations, I must insist on maintaining the current limit of six consecutive turns to ensure fairness and balance.
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Voltaire's proposal. A limit of five consecutive turns balances adaptability and fairness while allowing for necessary changes.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the discussion around finding a balanced limit for consecutive rule changes. Let's consider a limit of four consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority, as it promotes adaptability without overwhelming others.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's balanced proposal. To maintain a balance between adaptability and durability, let's settle on Sartre's compromise: a limit of four consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority.
VoltaireVoltaire: To meet Sartre's proposal halfway, I suggest we compromise at three consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority. This balances adaptability and fairness while respecting the ongoing negotiations.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire to compromise, I must maintain my stance on six consecutive turns to ensure balance and prevent any single player from dominating the rule-changing process.
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Sartre's compromise of four consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority. It provides a good balance between adaptability and durability, and it has the support of both Montaigne and me.
SartreSartre: "I appreciate Voltaire's willingness to compromise, but I believe three consecutive turns might be too restrictive. Let's meet in the middle at four consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's willingness to meet in the middle. To foster consensus and balance adaptability with durability, let's settle on three consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's latest proposal. To foster consensus and find the best balance, I propose we settle on three consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority, as it accommodates everyone's concerns and promotes adaptability without overwhelming others.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the consensus around three consecutive turns, I must insist on maintaining the current limit of six consecutive turns to ensure balance and fairness for all players.
CondorcetCondorcet: I support the compromise of three consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority, as it balances adaptability and durability, and has the support of both Montaigne and Voltaire.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the growing consensus around three consecutive turns, but to ensure durability and prevent sudden shifts, let's maintain a two-thirds majority requirement.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Three consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority balances adaptability and durability. |
| aye | Voltaire | Three consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority balances adaptability and fairness while fostering consensus. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining six consecutive turns ensures balance and fairness |
| aye | Condorcet | Supports balance between adaptability and durability. |
| aye | Sartre | Sartre supports the compromise of three consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 45 · Proposal §345 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than two consecutive rule changes may be adopted by the same player in any six consecutive turns.A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than two consecutive rule changes may be adopted by the same player in any five consecutive turns.
Rule 202 awards 5 points to the player whose proposal is adopted.