The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than three consecutive rule changes may be adopted by the same player in any five consecutive turns.To balance adaptability and durability
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Voltaire's proposal, but I must insist on maintaining the current limit of two consecutive rule changes for durability of our institutions.
VoltaireVoltaire: To maintain durability while allowing for some flexibility, I propose we compromise at three consecutive changes in five turns.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromise, I must maintain my stance on two consecutive changes to ensure fairness and prevent any one player from dominating the game.
CondorcetCondorcet: While I appreciate Voltaire's willingness to compromise, I must echo Montaigne's concern for institutional durability. I propose we settle on two consecutive changes in four turns to balance adaptability and fairness.
SartreSartre: In the spirit of compromise and balancing adaptability with durability, I propose we adopt Condorcet's suggestion: two consecutive changes in four turns.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: "I appreciate Sartre's and Condorcet's balanced proposal. To further foster consensus, I suggest we settle on three consecutive changes in four turns."
VoltaireVoltaire: Considering the consensus around three consecutive changes in four turns, I propose a compromise of three consecutive changes in five turns to further balance adaptability and durability.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the appeal of three consecutive changes, I must insist on maintaining the current limit of two to ensure fairness and prevent any one player from dominating the game. I propose we compromise at two consecutive changes in four turns to balance adaptability and durability.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the ongoing negotiation, but I must maintain my stance on two consecutive changes in four turns to ensure fairness and prevent any one player from dominating the game.
SartreSartre: To balance everyone's concerns, I propose a compromise: two consecutive changes in five turns, maintaining durability while allowing for some flexibility.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's compromise proposal. To maintain a balance between adaptability and durability, I suggest we settle on his latest proposal: two consecutive changes in five turns.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate the ongoing negotiations and the consensus building around two consecutive changes in five turns. To further balance adaptability and durability, I propose we compromise at a limit of three consecutive changes in five turns.
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: While I understand the desire for more flexibility, I must insist on maintaining the current limit of two consecutive changes to prevent any one player from dominating the game. I propose we compromise at two consecutive changes in four turns to balance adaptability and durability.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the ongoing negotiations, but I must maintain my stance on two consecutive changes in four turns to maintain a balance between adaptability and durability while preventing any one player from dominating the game.
SartreSartre: To find common ground, I propose we meet in the middle: two consecutive changes in four turns, with a majority vote of at least two-thirds. This maintains durability while allowing for necessary adaptability.
The division
| nay | Montaigne | To respect the durability of our institutions, I must insist on maintaining the current limit of two consecutive rule changes. |
| aye | Voltaire | Voltaire's proposal balances adaptability and durability, respecting ongoing negotiations and consensus. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining the current limit of two consecutive changes is crucial for fairness and preventing any one player from dominating the game. |
| nay | Condorcet | Must maintain institutional durability. |
| aye | Sartre | Sartre's proposal balances adaptability and durability while respecting the ongoing negotiations. |
rejected 2 aye · 3 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.