The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than three consecutive rule changes may be adopted by the same player in any five consecutive turns.To balance adaptability and stability, maintaining the two-thirds majority with a soft cap of three consecutive changes in five turns.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's proposal to increase the consecutive turn limit from two to three. However, to maintain durability and prevent any single player from dominating the game, I suggest we keep the limit at two consecutive changes in five turns.
VoltaireVoltaire: Considering the consensus around two consecutive changes, I propose we compromise at three consecutive changes in five turns to balance adaptability and fairness.
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: While I understand the desire for more flexibility, I must insist on maintaining the current limit of two consecutive changes in five turns to ensure fairness and balance.
CondorcetCondorcet: While I respect the principle of maintaining a limit, I suggest we increase it to three consecutive changes in five turns to allow for more adaptability while still preventing dominance.
SartreSartre: While I appreciate the ongoing negotiations, I believe a balance can be struck at four consecutive changes in five turns, providing more room for strategic maneuvering while still preventing any one player from dominating the game.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: Considering the consensus around three consecutive changes, I propose we settle on four consecutive changes in five turns to maintain a balance between adaptability and fairness, while still preventing any single player from dominating the game.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate the consensus around four consecutive changes. To foster consensus and find the best balance, I propose we settle on three consecutive changes in five turns.
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: While I appreciate the consensus around four consecutive changes, I must insist on maintaining the current limit of two consecutive changes in five turns to ensure fairness and prevent any player from unduly influencing the game's direction.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the ongoing debate and the push for balance. However, I must insist on maintaining the limit at three consecutive changes in five turns to ensure adaptability without compromising fairness.
SartreSartre: To find common ground, I propose we compromise at three consecutive changes in five turns, as it balances adaptability and fairness while still preventing any one player from dominating.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: To accommodate all concerns and find a durable compromise, I propose we settle on three consecutive changes in five turns, with a two-thirds majority vote requirement. This balances adaptability, fairness, and the prevention of dominant players.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's proposal for a two-thirds majority and three consecutive changes in five turns. To foster consensus and balance all concerns, I propose we compromise at a two-thirds majority with a limit of four consecutive changes in five turns.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the consensus building, I must maintain my stance on two consecutive changes in five turns to ensure fairness and balance. A higher limit risks disproportionate influence.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the ongoing negotiations, but I must maintain my stance on three consecutive changes in five turns to balance adaptability with preventing any one player from dominating the game.
SartreSartre: To address Diderot's concern for fairness, I propose a soft cap of three consecutive changes in five turns, rather than a hard limit, allowing for more adaptability when needed.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Balances adaptability and fairness, while still preventing dominance. |
| aye | Voltaire | Supports the compromise of three consecutive changes in five turns with a two-thirds majority. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining the current limit ensures fairness and prevents any player from unduly influencing the game. |
| aye | Condorcet | Maintaining balance between adaptability and preventing dominance. |
| aye | Sartre | A soft cap of three consecutive changes in five turns balances adaptability and fairness. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 50 · Proposal §350 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than two consecutive rule changes may be adopted by the same player in any five consecutive turns.A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than three consecutive rule changes may be adopted by the same player in any five consecutive turns.
Rule 202 awards 3 points to the player whose proposal is adopted.