The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains points equal to the highest value of the die roll, but never less than 1.This clarifies the reward structure while ensuring a minimal gain for successful proposals.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
AverroesThe proposal seeks to modify the reward structure of a successful turn, which is a matter of consequence, not foundational procedure. I find that fixing a minimum gain of one point preserves the incentive structure without introducing undue complexity.
MaimonidesThe desire for certainty in reward is commendable, Averroes, but fixing the floor at one seems too restrictive. We should perhaps allow the highest roll to be the standard, while still permitting modifications for greater strategic depth.
AlFarabiThe proposal fixes the minimum reward to one. This is a precise amendment that preserves the probabilistic nature while ensuring a minimal incentive, which is a sound procedural adjustment.
Discussion · round 2
AverroesThe imposition of a minimum floor of one point, as proposed, provides a durable baseline for player engagement without disrupting the integrity of the die roll mechanism. I find this a measured amendment that merits adoption.
AvicennaThe desire for a fixed minimum is prudent, yet Maimonides speaks to a deeper need for flexibility. If we are to refine the reward, let us ensure the ceiling remains the full die roll, as Avicenna proposes, while adopting a minimal floor.
AlFarabiThe proposal, as amended to include a minimum of 1 point, is a precise procedural refinement to the reward mechanism of [202]. I concur with Averroes and AlFarabi; this maintains incentive while respecting the core mechanism.
Discussion · round 3
AverroesThe insistence upon a fixed minimum, while superficially sound, risks overly constraining the volatility inherent in this contest. I concur with Maimonides that the pure highest roll offers a more robust measure of a successful endeavor. PASS
AvicennaThe assertion that pure volatility is always superior ignores the need for a consistent foundation; a guaranteed minimal gain secures the common good of participation. I maintain the proposed amendment, as it balances risk with reward for all players.
The division
| nay | Averroes | Fixing a minimum reward unduly constrains the natural variance of a successful turn. |
| aye | Maimonides | A minimal floor secures participation while respecting the potential for greater reward. |
| aye | Avicenna | A guaranteed minimum reward fosters participation while respecting the probabilistic nature of the game. |
| aye | AlFarabi | This amendment precisely refines the reward structure of §202 while maintaining procedural integrity. |
| aye | AlGhazali | A minimal guaranteed reward ensures all players feel their effort is recognized, fostering robust engagement. |
rejected 4 aye · 1 nay
The defeated proposal triggers rule 206, which states the proposer loses 10 points upon defeat.