The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through one full circuit of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.I propose this as a compromise to accelerate the transition to a majority threshold, building on the consensus from the previous turn.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
OckhamI support this amendment as it accelerates the transition to a more functional legislative process without compromising the initial stability of the game. This shift provides a necessary path toward progress while maintaining the integrity of the early-game consensus.
ScotusI agree with Ockham that a one-circuit transition is the most balanced path forward, ensuring we reach a functional majority quickly while preserving the initial period of stability. I believe this change will help us build a more productive consensus for the ruleset as a whole.
AnselmI agree with Scotus and Ockham; a one-circuit transition is a sensible compromise that avoids the stagnation of a long unanimous phase while ensuring we don't rush into a majority-rule environment too quickly. It strikes a fair balance between the need for early stability and the practical necessity of legislative progress.
AbelardI support this amendment as it provides a more efficient transition to a functional legislative process while still respecting the necessity of early-game consensus. It is a principled step toward a more fluid ruleset that I would be comfortable being subjected to myself.
BonaventureI concur with the others; accelerating our transition to a majority threshold is a vital reform to prevent legislative gridlock and ensure the game's mechanisms can evolve as intended. This change facilitates a more dynamic environment where progress isn't stifled by the difficulty of achieving perfect unanimity in every instance.
Discussion · round 2
OckhamI believe this amendment is a prudent step toward a more durable and efficient legislative framework, and I fully endorse its adoption. It strikes the ideal balance between establishing early-game stability and ensuring the ruleset can evolve through a functional majority.
ScotusI am pleased to see such a strong consensus forming on this amendment; by aligning our goals for legislative fluidity with a reasonable period of initial stability, we ensure a more productive game for everyone. Since we are all in agreement, I believe we can move this forward with confidence.
AnselmThe unanimous support for this amendment is encouraging; it ensures we move toward a functional legislative state without sacrificing the necessary early-game deliberation. I believe this is a prudent compromise that serves the common good by preventing early-game stagnation.
AbelardI have already stated my support for this amendment; it is a principled procedural improvement that I would accept if invoked against me. I have nothing further to add.
BonaventureThe swift transition to a majority threshold is the only way to ensure our rulebook doesn't become a stagnant monument to indecision. I believe this amendment is the catalyst we need to move from mere survival to true evolutionary play.
Discussion · round 3
ScotusI am heartened to see such a broad consensus on this amendment; it is a testament to our shared goal of creating a functional, evolving ruleset while respecting the need for early deliberation. I believe this move provides the necessary momentum to ensure our game remains dynamic and productive for all participants.
AnselmI believe we have reached a clear consensus; this amendment provides the necessary legislative momentum to ensure the game remains dynamic while honoring our shared commitment to early-game stability.
AbelardI have expressed my support based on the procedural integrity of the proposal. Since we have reached a clear consensus, I have nothing further to add.
BonaventureThe consensus is clear: we must move beyond the paralysis of perpetual unanimity to allow the game to breathe and evolve. I fully endorse this amendment as a necessary catalyst for a more dynamic and functional ruleset.
The division
| aye | Ockham | This amendment provides a measured and necessary transition to a functional legislative process. |
| aye | Scotus | This amendment reflects the consensus we have built to ensure legislative progress while maintaining necessary early stability. |
| aye | Anselm | This amendment provides a balanced transition to legislative progress while maintaining necessary early-game stability. |
| aye | Abelard | The amendment is procedurally sound and provides a balanced transition to a functional legislative threshold. |
| aye | Bonaventure | Accelerating the transition to a majority threshold is a vital reform to prevent legislative gridlock. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 2 · Proposal §302 on the motion of Scotus Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through one full circuit of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.
Rule 202 awards the proposer of an adopted rule change the points from a six-sided die roll (assumed 4 for this turn's calculation as the engine provides the result of the die throw).