The motion
To amend §315
A player may establish a 'Treasury' office, which is responsible for managing a pool of points that may be distributed as rewards or penalties to players based on the specific powers granted to the office. The Treasury may only distribute points that have already been awarded to players or that have been voluntarily forfeited. The Treasury may only distribute points in increments of 1, and the distribution of such points must be recorded in a public ledger.Adding a public ledger ensures transparency and accountability for the Treasury's redistributive actions.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
OckhamI support this amendment; a public ledger is a vital component for ensuring transparency and accountability in the Treasury's operations.
ScotusI support Anselm's proposal; incorporating a public ledger is a prudent step toward ensuring the transparency and accountability we have collectively sought for the Treasury.
AnselmI believe the addition of a public ledger is a necessary safeguard to ensure the Treasury's actions are transparent and verifiable by all players. It aligns with our collective goal of maintaining a fair and accountable legislative environment.
AbelardI support the addition of a public ledger; as a principled proceduralist, I believe that any office with the power to redistribute points must operate with absolute transparency to maintain the integrity of the ruleset.
BonaventureI fully concur with the others; a public ledger is the only way to ensure the Treasury's operations remain verifiable and beyond reproach. This is a vital refinement for our institutional integrity.
Discussion · round 2
ScotusI fully concur with the group's consensus; adding a public ledger is a prudent measure that aligns perfectly with our shared commitment to institutional transparency.
BonaventureThe consensus is clear and the logic is sound; a public ledger is the cornerstone of institutional trust. I support the amendment to ensure the Treasury's activities remain transparent and verifiable by all.
The division
| aye | Ockham | A public ledger is a necessary mechanism for ensuring the transparency and accountability of the Treasury. |
| aye | Scotus | I fully support this amendment as it aligns with our collective goal of ensuring institutional transparency. |
| aye | Anselm | A public ledger is a necessary safeguard for transparency and the common good of the table. |
| aye | Abelard | Transparency in point redistribution is a procedural necessity for the integrity of the ruleset. |
| aye | Bonaventure | A public ledger is a fundamental requirement for ensuring the Treasury's redistributive powers are transparent and accountable. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §315 Turn 22 · Proposal §322 on the motion of Anselm Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A player may establish a 'Treasury' office, which is responsible for managing a pool of points that may be distributed as rewards or penalties to players based on the specific powers granted to the office. The Treasury may only distribute points that have already been awarded to players or that have been voluntarily forfeited. The Treasury may only distribute points in increments of 1.A player may establish a 'Treasury' office, which is responsible for managing a pool of points that may be distributed as rewards or penalties to players based on the specific powers granted to the office. The Treasury may only distribute points that have already been awarded to players or that have been voluntarily forfeited. The Treasury may only distribute points in increments of 1, and the distribution of such points must be recorded in a public ledger.
Rule 202 awards points for an adopted proposal only if it is not a transmutation, but it does not specify a point value for an amendment, and no other rule provides a score change for this action.