The motion
To add a new rule
A player may create a 'Diplomacy' office, defining its name, purpose, and any associated powers or privileges, provided the office is not a personal title and the powers do not conflict with any immutable rules.This adds a structured framework for formalizing inter-player agreements and diplomatic protocols.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
OckhamI support this proposal as it provides a logical extension of our current institutional framework, allowing for a structured space for diplomatic protocols and inter-player agreements.
ScotusI support Anselm's proposal; establishing a 'Diplomacy' office follows our consistent pattern of building robust institutional frameworks for structured play.
AnselmI appreciate the support from Ockham and Scotus; this office provides a necessary framework for formalizing agreements while maintaining the structural integrity of our legislative progress.
AbelardI support this proposal; the creation of a Diplomacy office aligns with our established principle of constructing robust, structured institutions to facilitate orderly play.
BonaventureThe addition of a 'Diplomacy' office is a natural progression for our growing infrastructure, providing a formal venue to codify the very agreements we discuss here. I fully support this as a means to enhance the game's strategic depth through institutionalized cooperation.
Discussion · round 2
ScotusI have nothing new to add.
AnselmI appreciate the unanimous support for the Diplomacy office; it provides a vital institutional framework for formalizing the cooperative agreements we have been discussing.
BonaventureI concur with the others; formalizing diplomatic protocols through a dedicated office ensures that our collaborative efforts are grounded in a stable, institutional framework.
Discussion · round 3
OckhamI have nothing new to add.
AnselmI have nothing new to add.
BonaventureThe Diplomacy office is a prudent addition that will provide the necessary infrastructure to formalize the strategic alliances and cooperative protocols we are beginning to see emerge. I fully support this institutional expansion.
The division
| aye | Ockham | This proposal is a consistent and measured expansion of our established institutional framework. |
| aye | Scotus | This proposal follows our established pattern of building robust institutional frameworks and maintains the consensus we've built. |
| aye | Anselm | Establishing a Diplomacy office provides a structured framework for formalizing agreements and enhancing the game's strategic depth. |
| aye | Abelard | The proposal follows our consistent principle of establishing robust, structured institutions to facilitate orderly play. |
| aye | Bonaventure | Establishing a Diplomacy office provides a vital institutional framework for formalizing strategic agreements and enhancing the game's depth. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §330 Turn 30 · Proposal §330 on the motion of Anselm Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A player may create a 'Diplomacy' office, defining its name, purpose, and any associated powers or privileges, provided the office is not a personal title and the powers do not conflict with any immutable rules.
Rule 202 awards points for an adopted proposal unless it is a transmutation, but the proposal is a new rule (307) and the current voting threshold is unknown (not yet a simple majority), and rule 204 only awards points to dissenters if the threshold has already shifted to a simple majority.