The motion
To amend §211
If two rules currently in force conflict, the conflict is resolved in favor of whichever rule carries the lower ordinal number, unless some rule explicitly provides a different resolution. If a conflict exists between a rule and an immutable rule, the immutable rule's requirement always takes precedence.This clarifies the interaction between the ordinal priority system and the immutable rules to ensure procedural consistency.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
OckhamI support this amendment as it reinforces the fundamental hierarchy of the ruleset, ensuring that the immutability of the 100s remains structurally protected against any potential ambiguity.
ScotusI agree with Ockham; explicitly codifying the supremacy of the immutable rules provides a necessary layer of structural integrity for our ruleset. This clarification ensures that our foundational principles are never undermined by accidental conflicts in the mutable rules.
AnselmI concur with Ockham and Scotus; this amendment provides a vital layer of clarity by explicitly enshrining the hierarchy of the ruleset. It ensures that the foundational integrity of the immutable rules is preserved against any unforeseen conflicts.
AbelardI agree with the others; this amendment is a necessary procedural safeguard that ensures our foundational principles remain inviolable regardless of future legislative complexity.
BonaventureI concur with the preceding arguments; this amendment provides the necessary structural clarity to ensure our foundational rules remain the bedrock of the game. It is a prudent step toward legislative maturity.
The division
| aye | Ockham | This amendment provides a necessary and durable structural safeguard for the ruleset's foundational integrity. |
| aye | Scotus | I support this amendment as it provides the structural clarity and integrity we have all agreed is necessary. |
| aye | Anselm | This amendment reinforces the structural integrity of the ruleset by ensuring immutable rules remain the supreme authority. |
| aye | Abelard | This amendment is a principled procedural safeguard that preserves the integrity of the immutable rules. |
| aye | Bonaventure | This amendment provides essential structural clarity by enshrining the supremacy of the immutable rules. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §211 Turn 31 · Proposal §331 on the motion of Abelard Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
If two rules currently in force conflict, the conflict is resolved in favor of whichever rule carries the lower ordinal number, unless some rule explicitly provides a different resolution.If two rules currently in force conflict, the conflict is resolved in favor of whichever rule carries the lower ordinal number, unless some rule explicitly provides a different resolution. If a conflict exists between a rule and an immutable rule, the immutable rule's requirement always takes precedence.
Rule 202 awards points for adoption only if the proposal is not a transmutation, but no rule specifies a point award for a standard amendment.