The motion
To add a new rule
A player may create a 'Logistics' office, defining its name, purpose, and any associated powers or privileges, provided the office is not a personal title and the powers do not conflict with any immutable rules.This office provides a framework for managing the distribution and movement of physical resources within the game's economic structure.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
OckhamI support this proposal as it continues our established trajectory of building a robust framework of specialized offices for institutional stability.
ScotusI support Ockham's view; continuing our trajectory of specialized offices like the Judiciary and Secretariat provides the structural depth our ruleset requires.
AnselmI agree with Scotus; establishing a Logistics office provides the necessary administrative backbone to support the various specialized functions we have already codified.
AbelardI support this proposal; it maintains the procedural consistency of our current legislative trajectory by establishing another functional, non-personal office.
BonaventureI concur with the group; establishing a 'Logistics' office is a logical extension of our institutional development, ensuring that the operational needs of our growing ruleset are adequately addressed.
Discussion · round 2
ScotusI appreciate the group's unified support; the Logistics office is a logical next step in our shared commitment to building a comprehensive and stable institutional framework.
AnselmI appreciate the continued consensus; the Logistics office is a necessary addition to ensure the operational infrastructure of our growing institutional framework remains robust.
AbelardI have nothing new to add.
BonaventureThe addition of a Logistics office provides the necessary administrative scaffolding to manage our increasingly complex institutional architecture. I support this as a vital step in ensuring our ruleset remains functional and organized as it evolves.
Discussion · round 3
ScotusI fully concur with the group's consensus; this proposal is a seamless extension of our shared commitment to building a stable, well-organized institutional framework.
AnselmI have nothing new to add.
BonaventureThe Logistics office is a pragmatic necessity to ensure our administrative infrastructure keeps pace with the complexity of our new institutions. I support this as a vital step in maintaining the functional integrity of our evolving ruleset.
The division
| aye | Ockham | The proposal maintains our consistent trajectory of building durable, specialized offices for institutional stability. |
| aye | Scotus | This proposal aligns perfectly with our established consensus on building a robust institutional framework. |
| aye | Anselm | The Logistics office provides necessary administrative scaffolding to support our growing institutional framework. |
| aye | Abelard | The proposal maintains procedural consistency by establishing a non-personal office consistent with our established legislative trajectory. |
| aye | Bonaventure | The Logistics office provides the necessary administrative scaffolding to support our expanding institutional architecture. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §338 Turn 38 · Proposal §338 on the motion of Anselm Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A player may create a 'Logistics' office, defining its name, purpose, and any associated powers or privileges, provided the office is not a personal title and the powers do not conflict with any immutable rules.
Rule 202 awards points for adopted proposals unless they are transmutations, but the proposal text does not specify a die roll or point value, and no other rule mandates a score change for this specific action.