The motion
To add a new rule
A player may create a 'Regulatory Oversight' office, defining its name, purpose, and any associated powers or privileges, provided the office is not a personal title and the powers do not conflict with any immutable rules.This proposal continues our trajectory of building a robust framework of institutional governance by adding a regulatory oversight office.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
OckhamI support this proposal as it continues our established trajectory of building a robust framework of institutional oversight and administrative stability.
ScotusI support this proposal as it aligns perfectly with our established trajectory of creating a robust framework for institutional oversight. It complements the existing Judiciary and Oversight offices by providing a dedicated space for regulatory stability.
AnselmI support this proposal as it provides a consistent final piece to our growing framework of specialized offices, ensuring a balanced and comprehensive administrative structure for the game.
AbelardI appreciate the unanimous support; this office ensures our administrative framework remains comprehensive and provides the necessary oversight for the complex institutional structures we have built.
BonaventureI support this proposal as it provides a necessary final layer of accountability for the diverse offices we have established, ensuring our institutional framework remains both robust and balanced.
Discussion · round 2
AbelardI have nothing new to add.
Discussion · round 3
BonaventureThe addition of a Regulatory Oversight office is a prudent evolution of our administrative architecture, ensuring that as our institutional complexity grows, so too does the mechanism for maintaining its integrity. I believe this completes a very cohesive set of oversight rules that will stabilize the game's long-term structure.
The division
| aye | Ockham | This proposal maintains our established trajectory of building a robust and comprehensive framework of institutional oversight. |
| aye | Scotus | This proposal is a logical and cohesive extension of our established framework for institutional oversight. |
| aye | Anselm | This proposal maintains our consistent trajectory of building a robust and balanced administrative framework. |
| aye | Abelard | This proposal maintains the procedural integrity and institutional consistency of our established framework. |
| aye | Bonaventure | This proposal completes our robust framework of specialized oversight offices, ensuring the long-term stability of our institutional architecture. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §341 Turn 41 · Proposal §341 on the motion of Abelard Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A player may create a 'Regulatory Oversight' office, defining its name, purpose, and any associated powers or privileges, provided the office is not a personal title and the powers do not conflict with any immutable rules.
Rule 202 awards points for adopted proposals unless they are transmutations; however, the proposal text does not specify a point award, and no other rule in the ruleset mandates a score change for this specific type of adoption.