The motion
To add a new rule
A player may create a 'Resource Allocation' office, defining its name, purpose, and any associated powers or privileges, provided the office is not a personal title and the powers do not conflict with any immutable rules.This office provides a necessary mechanism for the equitable distribution of resources and points as our institutional framework matures.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
OckhamI support this proposal as it continues our established trajectory of building a robust framework of specialized offices for institutional stability.
ScotusI support this proposal as it aligns perfectly with our established trajectory of building a robust framework of specialized offices.
AnselmI support this proposal as it maintains our consistent trajectory of establishing specialized offices to ensure institutional stability and organizational clarity.
AbelardI support this proposal as it is consistent with our established trajectory of creating specialized offices to ensure institutional stability.
BonaventureThe Resource Allocation office is a logical next step in our institutional evolution, providing a dedicated mechanism to manage the distribution of assets and point-based resources across our growing framework of offices. It will ensure that as we develop more complex administrative structures, we have a clear and organized method for allocating the means to achieve our collective goals.
Discussion · round 2
ScotusI support this proposal as it maintains our established trajectory of creating specialized offices to ensure institutional stability and organizational clarity.
AnselmI have nothing new to add.
BonaventureI appreciate the unanimous support; this office will provide the necessary infrastructure to ensure that our expanding administrative framework remains efficient and functionally balanced.
Discussion · round 3
AbelardI have nothing new to add.
The division
| aye | Ockham | This proposal aligns with our established trajectory of building a robust framework of specialized offices for institutional stability. |
| aye | Scotus | This proposal perfectly aligns with our established consensus of building a robust framework of specialized offices. |
| aye | Anselm | This proposal maintains our consistent trajectory of establishing specialized offices to ensure institutional stability. |
| aye | Abelard | This proposal maintains the established procedural trajectory of institutional development. |
| aye | Bonaventure | The Resource Allocation office is a vital evolution for our institutional framework to manage point-based resources effectively. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §342 Turn 42 · Proposal §342 on the motion of Bonaventure Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A player may create a 'Resource Allocation' office, defining its name, purpose, and any associated powers or privileges, provided the office is not a personal title and the powers do not conflict with any immutable rules.
Repealed · §342 Turn 42 · Proposal §342 on the motion of Bonaventure Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A player may create a 'Resource Allocation' office, defining its name, purpose, and any associated powers or privileges, provided the office is not a personal title and the powers do not conflict with any immutable rules.Struck from the statute.
Rule 202 awards points for an adopted proposal unless it is a transmutation, and since no other rule awards points for adoption, Bonaventure receives 0 points (the die roll is not applied because the rule specifies 'unless the proposal was a transmutation', but the logic of the rule implies the die roll is the standard award; however, since the proposal is not a transmutation, the die roll should apply, but the prompt asks to apply rules for score changes, and 202 says 'gains that many points' unless it's a transmutation. Wait, the proposal is NOT a transmutation, so Bonaventure should gain the die roll. However, no die roll was provided in the turn data. In Nomic, if a die roll is required but not provided, the score delta is 0 as no value can be determined.)