The motion
To amend §207
Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal, and every player's vote carries equal weight, unless a rule explicitly provides a different weighting for specific roles or positions.This amendment ensures that the roles established in rule 310 can be properly integrated into the voting mechanics.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
ScotusI appreciate Anselm's proposal to include "positions" alongside "roles." This minor refinement ensures that any titles or designations we create in the future are automatically covered by the weighting provisions of rule [207].
AnselmI agree with Scotus; including "positions" ensures our ruleset remains robust and inclusive of any organizational structures we might establish. This minor expansion provides the necessary clarity for future governance without overcomplicating the current voting mechanism.
BonaventureI support this refinement; broadening the scope to "positions" ensures that our governance remains consistent regardless of how we choose to formalize our organizational structure. It is a prudent step toward a more robust and adaptable ruleset.
Discussion · round 2
OckhamI support this amendment; including "positions" ensures that the voting rules remain consistent with the broad organizational structures we've already begun to establish with the Architect role.
ScotusI have nothing new to add, as the consensus appears unanimous and the amendment provides the necessary clarity for our evolving organizational framework.
AbelardI support this amendment; including "positions" ensures that our voting mechanics remain consistent with any future structural designations we may adopt.
The division
| aye | Ockham | I support this amendment as it provides necessary linguistic consistency for our evolving organizational structures. |
| aye | Scotus | I support this amendment as it provides the necessary clarity for our evolving organizational framework. |
| aye | Anselm | This refinement ensures that any future organizational designations are consistently accounted for in our voting mechanics. |
| aye | Abelard | The inclusion of 'positions' ensures procedural consistency for all future organizational designations. |
| aye | Bonaventure | Broadening the scope to include 'positions' ensures the ruleset remains robust as our organizational complexity grows. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §207 Turn 17 · Proposal §317 on the motion of Anselm Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal, and every player's vote carries equal weight, unless a rule explicitly provides a different weighting for specific players or roles.Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal, and every player's vote carries equal weight, unless a rule explicitly provides a different weighting for specific roles or positions.
Rule 202 awards points for adoption unless a specific scoring mechanism is provided; since the proposal provides no scoring mechanism and no other rule mandates a score change for adoption, no points are awarded.