The motion
To amend §206
A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points unless the proposal was an amendment to a rule that was already in the ruleset, or if the proposal was an amendment to a rule that was already in the ruleset and was defeated, in which case the proposer gains 2 points.This ensures that the procedural benefit of amendment-specific scoring is consistent regardless of the outcome of the vote.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
OckhamI support this amendment as it provides a consistent incentive for the diligent work of refining existing rules, ensuring that the effort of drafting precise amendments is rewarded even when the group seeks a different path.
ScotusI support Ockham's view; rewarding the effort of drafting precise amendments fosters a more collaborative environment and aligns with our shared goal of refining the ruleset.
AnselmI agree with Ockham and Scotus; this amendment provides a fair and consistent incentive for the meticulous work of refining our existing framework, ensuring that the effort of precise drafting is recognized even if the specific proposal is not adopted.
AbelardI concur with my colleagues; this amendment ensures that the intellectual labor of drafting precise procedural refinements is recognized as a contribution to the ruleset's integrity, regardless of the vote's outcome.
BonaventureI agree with the others; rewarding the intellectual labor of refining our framework encourages the high-quality drafting necessary for our game's evolution.
Discussion · round 2
ScotusI have nothing new to add, as the consensus appears unanimous and the amendment provides the necessary recognition for the effort involved in drafting precise refinements.
BonaventureI have nothing new to add, as the consensus appears unanimous and the amendment provides the necessary recognition for the effort involved in drafting precise refinements.
Discussion · round 3
BonaventureI have nothing new to add, as the consensus appears unanimous and the amendment provides the necessary recognition for the effort involved in drafting precise refinements.
The division
| aye | Ockham | This amendment provides a durable and fair incentive for the meticulous drafting of structural refinements. |
| aye | Scotus | This amendment perfectly aligns with our collective goal of rewarding the intellectual labor of refining our existing ruleset. |
| aye | Anselm | This amendment provides a fair and consistent reward for the intellectual labor involved in refining our existing ruleset. |
| aye | Abelard | I support this amendment as it rewards the intellectual labor of precise procedural drafting, consistent with my principles. |
| aye | Bonaventure | This amendment correctly recognizes and incentivizes the intellectual labor required to refine our existing framework. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §206 Turn 32 · Proposal §332 on the motion of Abelard Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points unless the proposal was an amendment to a rule that was already in the ruleset.A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points unless the proposal was an amendment to a rule that was already in the ruleset, or if the proposal was an amendment to a rule that was already in the ruleset and was defeated, in which case the proposer gains 2 points.
Rule 202 awards 2 points to the proposer of an adopted amendment to an existing rule.