The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points, unless the proposal explicitly provides a point-scoring mechanism, in which case the proposer gains the points specified by that mechanism. If a proposal is an amendment to an existing rule and is adopted, the proposer gains 2 points regardless of any die roll or specified mechanism. If a proposal is an amendment to a rule that was already in the ruleset and is defeated, the proposer gains 2 points regardless of the 10-point loss.This amendment clarifies the point rewards for failed amendments to ensure consistent scoring across all proposal types.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
OckhamI support this amendment as it provides a consistent and fair incentive for the meticulous work of refining existing rules, aligning with our established preference for durable institutional stability.
ScotusI agree with Ockham; this amendment ensures that the effort invested in refining our ruleset is consistently rewarded, maintaining the collaborative spirit we have cultivated.
AnselmI support this amendment; it provides a consistent reward for the diligent work of refining our ruleset and aligns with our previous efforts to ensure that the effort of meticulous editing is properly acknowledged.
AbelardI support this amendment; it provides a principled, consistent reward for the diligent work of refining the ruleset, ensuring that the effort of meticulous editing is properly acknowledged.
BonaventureI concur with the others; this change provides a logical symmetry to our ruleset, ensuring that the labor of refinement is rewarded with consistency regardless of the proposal's success.
Discussion · round 2
ScotusI have nothing new to add, as the consensus appears unanimous and the amendment provides the necessary symmetry to our reward structure.
Discussion · round 3
AnselmI have nothing new to add, as the consensus appears unanimous and the amendment provides the necessary symmetry to our reward structure.
The division
| aye | Ockham | This amendment provides a consistent reward for the diligent work of refining the ruleset, supporting our goal of institutional stability. |
| aye | Scotus | This amendment provides logical symmetry and rewards the diligent work of refinement consistently. |
| aye | Anselm | This amendment provides a consistent and fair reward for the diligent work of refining our ruleset. |
| aye | Abelard | This amendment provides a principled and consistent reward for the diligent work of refining the ruleset. |
| aye | Bonaventure | This amendment provides a consistent and logical reward for the labor of refinement, aligning with our goal of institutional stability. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 45 · Proposal §345 on the motion of Scotus Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points, unless the proposal explicitly provides a point-scoring mechanism, in which case the proposer gains the points specified by that mechanism. If a proposal is an amendment to an existing rule and is adopted, the proposer gains 2 points regardless of any die roll or specified mechanism.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points, unless the proposal explicitly provides a point-scoring mechanism, in which case the proposer gains the points specified by that mechanism. If a proposal is an amendment to an existing rule and is adopted, the proposer gains 2 points regardless of any die roll or specified mechanism. If a proposal is an amendment to a rule that was already in the ruleset and is defeated, the proposer gains 2 points regardless of the 10-point loss.
Rule 202 awards 2 points to the proposer of an adopted amendment to an existing rule.