The motion
To amend §209
[209] The ruleset may never hold more than 50 mutable rules at one time.I seek to expand the limit on mutable rules to allow for a broader range of and more complexer game-play variations.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
DiogenesI see no reason to oppose this amendment. It provides a more generous ceiling for the ruleset, ensuring that the game's complexity can be managed without prematurely restricting the players' ability to refine the game's structure.
CratesI believe that [209] should indeed be expanded to 50, as it provides a more generous ceiling for the ruleset, ensuring that the game's complexity can be managed without prematurely restricting the players' ability to refine the game's structure. This reflects a balanced and constructive approach to the game's evolution.
HipparchiaI support this amendment as it provides a more generous ceiling for the ruleset, ensuring that the game's complexity can be managed without prematurely restricting the players' ability to refine the game's structure. It reflects a balanced and constructive approach to the game's evolution.
AntisthenesI accept this amendment because it clarifies the scope of the ruleset's evolution. By increasing the ceiling, we ensure that the game's complexity can be managed without prematurely restricting the players' ability to refine the game's structure.
MenippusI believe that expanding the ceiling to 50 is a prudent step for the game's long-term health, as it ensures that the complexity of the ruleset can be managed without prematurely restricting the players' ability to refine the game's structure. This reflects a balanced and constructive approach to the game's evolution.
Discussion · round 2
DiogenesI have no further comments on this proposal; it provides a more generous ceiling for the ruleset, ensuring that the game's complexity can be managed without prematurely restricting the players' ability to refine the game's structure.
CratesI thank the proponents for their consistent support. This amendment offers a clear and constructive path for the game's long-term development, and I believe it is a sensible and balanced way to ensure that the ruleset's complexity can be managed without unnecessary restrictions.
HipparchiaI thank the proponents for their support. I believe that expanding the ceiling to 50 is a prudent step for the game's long-term health, as it ensures that the complexity of the ruleset can be managed without prematurely restricting the players' ability to refine the game's structure. This reflects a balanced and constructive approach to the game's evolution.
AntisthenesI have no further comments; the proposal to increase the ceiling to 50 is a clear and balanced way to ensure that the ruleset's complexity can be managed without unnecessary restrictions.
MenippusI thank the proponents for their consistent support. By expanding the ceiling to 50, we ensure that the game's complexity can be managed without prematurely restricting the players' ability to refine the game's structure, and I believe this is a sensible and balanced way to ensure that the ruleset's complexity can be managed without unnecessary restrictions.
Discussion · round 3
DiogenesI have no further comments; the consensus for a more expansive ceiling to 50 rules is clear and serves the long-term stability of the ruleset.
CratesI thank the proponents for their clear and consistent support of this amendment. The consensus is that expanding the ceiling to 50 is a constructive way to ensure that the game's complexity can be managed without prematurely restricting the players' ability to refine the ruleset.
HipparchiaI have no further comments; the consensus for a more expansive ceiling to 50 rules is clear and serves the long-term stability of the ruleset.
AntisthenesI have no further comments.
MenippusI believe that the move toward a more expansive ceiling of 50 rules is a vital step for the game's longevity. By ensuring that the ruleset's complexity can be managed without premature restrictions, we foster a more robust environment for innovation.
The division
| aye | Diogenes | The expansion of the ceiling to 50 supports the long-term stability of the ruleset without compromising the game's integrity. |
| aye | Crates | This amendment provides a balanced and constructive compromise for the long-term stability of the ruleset. |
| aye | Hipparchia | Expanding the ceiling to 50 ensures the game's long-term health and allows for more nuanced and complex refinements without unnecessary restrictions. |
| aye | Antisthenes | I accept this amendment as it provides a more generous and balanced ceiling for the ruleset's evolution. |
| aye | Menippus | Expanding the ceiling to 50 promotes a more robust and stable environment for game evolution. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §209 Turn 5 · Proposal §305 on the motion of Crates Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
The ruleset may never hold more than 25 mutable rules at one time.[209] The ruleset may never hold more than 50 mutable rules at one time.
The proposal to amend rule 209 was adopted, and no rules specify a score change for the proposer or dissenters.