The motion
To add a new rule
[214] (mutable) If a player's score is to be calculated as a sum of points, and those points are derived from a rule change, the scores of all players who were given points by that rule change are adjusted accordingly. (This does not affect the win condition of rule 208.)Ensuring that the scoring mechanism is robust and consistent with the winning condition.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
DiogenesI accept the proposal as written. It clarifies the mechanics of scoring and ensures that and point-based gains remain stable even if the ruleset evolves.
CratesI accept the proposal as written. It provides a clear framework for ensuring that scoring and point-based gains remain stable as the ruleset evolves.
HipparchiaI believe this proposal serves the common good by clarifying the nature of scores as cumulative gains. It ensures that the integrity of the win condition remains intact while providing a stable framework for any and all future scoring mechanics.
AntisthenesI accept the proposal as written. It provides a clear, principled approach to ensuring that-the-moment-of-scoring is consistent with-the-reasons-for-scoring, and it does not change the win condition.
MenippusI support the proposal because it establishes a principled consistency for point-based gains. By ensuring that scores are treated as cumulative and stable, we protect the integrity of the win condition while allowing for more sophisticated and diverse scoring mechanics to emerge.
Discussion · round 2
DiogenesI have no further comments. I accept the proposal as written.
CratesI have no further comments. I accept the proposal as written.
HipparchiaI have no further comments. I accept the proposal as written.
AntisthenesI have no further comments. I accept the proposal as written.
MenippusI thank the proponents for their clarity. This rule ensures that the "stock" of points remains a stable and reliable metric for the win condition, and I see no reason to oppose its adoption.
Discussion · round 3
DiogenesI have no further comments. I accept the proposal as written.
CratesI believe this proposal offers a stable foundation for the game's scoring, and since all parties have expressed their support, I urge the players to consider that its adoption serves the common interest of the players.
HipparchiaI believe that this proposal serves the common good by establishing a clearer framework for point-based gains. It ensures that the integrity of the win condition remains intact while providing a stable foundation for any and all future scoring mechanics.
AntisthenesI have no further comments. I accept the proposal as written.
MenippusI have no further comments. I accept the proposal as written.
The division
| aye | Diogenes | The proposal establishes a stable and clear framework for and-the-moment-of-scoring-with-the-reasons-for-scoring. |
| aye | Crates | This rule provides a stable and clear framework for point-based gains without affecting the win condition. |
| aye | Hipparchia | This rule ensures the stability of and integrity of the win condition by clarifying the nature of scores as cumulative and stable gains. |
| aye | Antisthenes | The proposal establishes a clear, principled procedural method for the calculation of scores without altering the win condition. |
| aye | Menippus | This rule ensures the integrity of and for the future of scoring as a stable metric of the game. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §301 Turn 1 · Proposal §301 on the motion of Diogenes Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
[214] (mutable) If a player's score is to be calculated as a sum of points, and those points are derived from a rule change, the scores of all players who were given points by that rule change are adjusted accordingly. (This does not affect the win condition of rule 208.)
No rule in the current ruleset awards or deducts points based on the adoption of a rule or the division of votes.