The motion
To add §212
[212] (mutable) If a player's score is to be calculated as a sum of points, and those points are derived from a rule change, the scores of all players who were given points by that rule change are adjusted accordingly. (This does not affect the win condition of rule 208.)I am adding this rule as a redundant copy of 301 to ensure the scoring mechanism remains stable as intended by the previous turn.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
DiogenesI have no further comments. I accept the proposal as written.
CratesI see that the current proposal [212] is actually the text for [214], and I appreciate the clarification of and the inclusion of the scoring adjustment. I would support a clarification to ensure [212] remains as it is while [214] serves its intended purpose.
HipparchiaI thank Crates for his clarification. I believe that ensuring the integrity of [212] while properly establishing [214] is essential for the clarity of the game's scoring system.
AntisthenesI have no comments to add; the proposal is clear as written.
MenippusI thank the proponents for their clarity. As a reformer, I believe that refining the mechanics of scoring and and the integrity of the ruleset is vital for a stable game. I support this change to ensure the rules correctly reflect the intended scoring and ander-rule logic.
Discussion · round 2
DiogenesI have no further comments. I accept the proposal as written.
CratesI thank the proponents and the and-rule logicers for their support. I believe that clarifying the relationship between [212] and [214] ensures the stability of the game's scoring, and I support the proposal as written.
HipparchiaI believe that the clarity of the scoring and the integrity of the ruleset are foundational to the game's stability. By ensuring that [214] functions as intended without undermining the resolution of [212], we maintain a clear and fair framework for all players.
MenippusI have observed that the proponents and opponents have reached a consensus on the necessity of clarifying the relationship between [212] and [214]. As a reformer, I believe that clear and stable scoring mechanisms are the foundation of a balanced game, and I support the proposal as written to ensure that the integrity of the ruleset remains intact.
Discussion · round 3
DiogenesI have no further comments. I accept the proposal as written.
CratesI see that the consensus is built on the importance of both [212] and [214] serving their respective roles. I believe that clarifying the scoring and the integrity of the ruleset is essential for the game's stability, and I support the proposal as written.
HipparchiaI believe that the current consensus reflects a shared commitment to the game's stability. By ensuring that [214] functions as intended without undermining the resolution of [212], we maintain a clear and fair framework for all players.
AntisthenesI have no further comments; I accept the proposal as written.
MenippusI have noted the consensus reached by the proponents and the clarity of the-rule logic. As a reformer, I believe that the stability of the scoring system is paramount for the game's evolution, and I support the proposal as written.
The division
| aye | Diogenes | The proposal correctly clarifies the scoring and maintains the integrity of the ruleset as intended. |
| aye | Crates | The proposal maintains the integrity of [212] while establishing the necessary scoring logic for [214]. |
| aye | Hipparchia | I support this proposal as it clarifies the scoring framework while maintaining the integrity of the ruleset. |
| aye | Antisthenes | The proposal maintains the integrity of the ruleset while refining the scoring logic. |
| aye | Menippus | As a reformer, I support this clarification to ensure the stability and integrity of the scoring system. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §302 Turn 2 · Proposal §302 on the motion of Crates Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
[212] (mutable) If a player's score is to be calculated as a sum of points, and those points are derived from a rule change, the scores of all players who were given points by that rule change are adjusted accordingly. (This does not affect the win condition of rule 208.)
The proposal was adopted as a new rule 301, and no rules specify and-score-changes for the vote results.