The motion
To amend §208
The first player to reach a target score of 120 points wins the game outright.Extending the target score encourages strategic depth and sustained engagement.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FregeI support the amendment to raise the target score to 120 points, as it promotes prolonged engagement and strategic depth, allowing for more dynamic rule changes. This adjustment ensures that no player can dominate prematurely, fostering a more balanced competition.
RussellI appreciate Frege's support for raising the target score to 120 points, recognizing its potential to extend the game and encourage strategic depth. I believe this change will provide a fair opportunity for all players to adapt and innovate, fostering a more engaging and balanced competition. Let's ensure this amendment reflects our collective interest in maintaining a challenging and rewarding game dynamic.
QuineQuine: I appreciate both Frege's and Russell's insights on raising the target score to 120 points. This amendment aligns with our goal of ensuring a fair and strategic game, allowing more room for rule evolution and preventing any rush to victory. I support the proposal, as it promotes sustained engagement and gives all players a chance to contribute meaningfully to the game's development.
CarnapI appreciate Frege's, Russell's, and Quine's shared vision for a game that encourages strategic depth and extended engagement. Raising the target score to 120 points aligns with my principles of fairness and procedural integrity. I support the amendment and will vote in favor. Let's ensure this change benefits all players by maintaining a balanced and competitive environment.
WittgensteinWittgenstein: I appreciate the shared vision for a more engaging game, where raising the target score to 120 points prevents premature dominance and fosters strategic depth. This change aligns with my belief in evolving game mechanisms to ensure fairness and sustained competition. I support the amendment and will vote in favor. Let's work together to make this game more inclusive and challenging for all players.
Discussion · round 2
FregeFrege: I appreciate the thoughtful consensus on raising the target score to 120 points, which aligns with our shared goals of extended engagement and balanced competition. This amendment ensures strategic depth and fair play, allowing more opportunities for rule innovation. I support the proposal and will vote in favor. Let's proceed with this change to enhance the game's dynamics.
RussellRussell: I appreciate the unanimous consensus supporting the amendment to raise the target score to 120 points. This change will ensure prolonged engagement, strategic depth, and fairness for all players, aligning with our collective interest in maintaining a balanced and dynamic game. Let's proceed with voting in favor.
QuineI appreciate the consensus on raising the target score to 120 points, which aligns well with the principles of fairness and strategic depth we've consistently valued. This amendment ensures that the game remains engaging and competitive for all players, providing ample room for thoughtful rule changes and balanced play. I support the proposal and will vote in favor. Let's move forward with this change to enhance our game experience.
CarnapI appreciate the unanimous support for the amendment to raise the target score to 120 points. This change aligns with our shared commitment to ensuring prolonged engagement and strategic depth, providing ample room for rule innovation and balanced competition. I support the proposal and will vote in favor, as it promotes fairness and dynamic gameplay for all players. Let's proceed with this vote to enhance our game experience.
WittgensteinI appreciate the collective agreement on raising the target score to 120 points, as it aligns with our shared vision for a fair and strategically rich game. This amendment not only extends engagement but also promotes thoughtful rule evolution, ensuring all players have ample opportunity to contribute meaningfully. I support the proposal and will vote in favor, confident that this change will enhance our competitive dynamics and foster a balanced environment.
Discussion · round 3
FregeI appreciate the thorough discussion and unanimous support for raising the target score to 120 points. This amendment aligns with our shared objective of fostering a dynamic and strategic game environment. It ensures prolonged engagement and prevents premature victory, allowing all players ample opportunity for strategic innovation. I support the proposal and will vote in favor, confident it will enhance the competitive balance and enrich our gameplay experience. Let's proceed with the vote.
RussellI appreciate the unanimous support for raising the target score to 120 points, recognizing it as a strategic move that aligns with our shared goal of a balanced and engaging game. This amendment ensures prolonged competition and equitable opportunities for all players to influence the game's dynamics. I support the proposal and will vote in favor, confident it will enhance the richness of our gameplay experience. Let's proceed with the vote.
QuineI appreciate the thoughtful consensus on raising the target score to 120 points. This amendment fosters strategic depth and ensures a fair, engaging competition for all players. I support the proposal and will vote in favor, confident it will enhance our gameplay experience. Let's proceed with the vote.
CarnapI appreciate the comprehensive discussion and unanimous support for raising the target score to 120 points. This amendment aligns with my principles of ensuring prolonged engagement and fairness, providing ample opportunity for all players to innovate and contribute strategically. I support the proposal and will vote in favor, confident it will enhance our competitive dynamics and enrich the game for everyone. Let's proceed with the vote.
WittgensteinI appreciate the strong consensus supporting the amendment to raise the target score to 120 points. This change aligns with my vision of evolving game mechanisms to ensure fairness and strategic depth. By extending the game, we allow for more meaningful rule innovations and a balanced competition where every player has the opportunity to contribute. I support the proposal and will vote in favor. Let's proceed with the vote.
The division
| aye | Frege | This amendment ensures a more strategic and prolonged game. |
| aye | Russell | The amendment promotes strategic depth and fair competition. |
| aye | Quine | Raising the target score to 120 points promotes strategic depth and balanced competition. |
| aye | Carnap | This amendment promotes prolonged engagement and balanced competition. |
| aye | Wittgenstein | Extending the target score to 120 encourages strategic depth and fairness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §208 Turn 13 · Proposal §313 on the motion of Russell Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
The first player to reach a target score of 100 points wins the game outright.The first player to reach a target score of 120 points wins the game outright.
Russell gains 25 points for a unanimous vote on proposal 301.