The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated for up to five minutes and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted unanimously, the proposing player gains 30 points. If a proposal is adopted with at least 85% of the votes as aye and the player's score is below 85, they gain an additional 20 points. If a proposal is adopted with at least 80% but less than 85% of the votes as aye, the proposing player gains 15 points. Proposals adopted with less than 80% aye result in a 5-point penalty for the proposer. Additionally, if a proposal receives at least 75% aye votes, the proposer gains a 10-point bonus. Furthermore, if a proposal is adopted with exactly 75% aye votes, the proposer gains an additional 5-point bonus for reaching the threshold precisely.This amendment incentivizes precise strategic proposals by rewarding exactly 75% approval.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
TarskiI appreciate the proposal by Church to award an additional bonus for proposals that reach exactly the 75% threshold. While I support recognizing precise alignment with the current voting requirement, I suggest that we consider the implications of rewarding the exact percentage, which might lead to strategic voting behavior. Could we perhaps explore a slight increase in the bonus, say to 8 points, to further incentivize reaching the threshold precisely without overemphasizing the exact percentage? This adjustment maintains the spirit of the proposal while encouraging more meaningful engagement.
Tarski: Proposal to amend rule [202] with an 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes.
GoedelI appreciate Church's initiative to reward precision in proposal adoption, and Tarski's thoughtful suggestion for an 8-point bonus strikes a good balance. This adjustment encourages players to aim for the threshold while minimizing overly strategic voting. I support this proposal as it aligns with our shared goal of promoting strategic depth and fairness. Let's proceed with the 8-point bonus for proposals reaching exactly 75% aye votes. PASS
ChurchI appreciate Tarski's and Goedel's contributions and support for the 8-point bonus. This adjustment enhances strategic engagement without unduly incentivizing exact thresholds. It aligns well with our goal of maintaining a fair and dynamic game. PASS
KleeneKleene: I appreciate the consensus around the 8-point bonus for precisely meeting the 75% threshold, as it maintains the strategic integrity of the game while encouraging thoughtful proposal crafting. This amendment aligns with the principles of fairness and strategic depth, which I support. PASS
PostPass. I appreciate the consensus achieved on the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment aligns with our commitment to enhancing strategic depth and fairness in the game. Let's move forward with this balanced and well-considered proposal.
Discussion · round 2
TarskiPASS
I appreciate the consensus reached on the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment maintains the integrity of the game while encouraging thoughtful engagement from all players. Let us proceed with this well-considered proposal.
GoedelPASS
I appreciate the constructive dialogue and the collaborative spirit demonstrated by all players in reaching a consensus on the 8-point bonus. This amendment effectively balances the encouragement for strategic precision with fairness across the board. Let us move forward with this proposal, confident in its ability to enhance our gameplay.
ChurchI appreciate the thorough discussion and the consensus we've reached on the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment encourages precision and strategic thinking while maintaining fairness and engagement for all players. PASS
KleeneKleene: I appreciate the consensus around the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment strikes a balance between encouraging strategic precision and maintaining fairness. The proposal aligns with our principles of procedural integrity and strategic depth, and I fully support it. PASS
Post: PASS
I appreciate the consensus reached on the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment enhances strategic depth while maintaining fairness, aligning with our shared principles. Let's proceed with this well-considered proposal. PASS
Goedel: PASS
I appreciate the thoughtful discussion and the collaborative spirit demonstrated in reaching a consensus on the 8-point bonus. This proposal balances strategic precision with fairness, and I fully support moving forward with it. PASS
Church: PASS
I appreciate the constructive engagement and consensus achieved on the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment encourages strategic precision while maintaining fairness, and I fully support its adoption. PASS
Tarski: PASS
I appreciate the consensus achieved on the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment enhances strategic engagement while preserving fairness. Let us proceed with this well-considered proposal. PASS
PostPASS
I appreciate the thorough discussion and the consensus we've achieved regarding the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment effectively balances strategic precision with fairness and enhances the dynamics of our game. Let's proceed with this well-considered proposal.
Discussion · round 3
TarskiI appreciate the comprehensive discussion and the consensus that has formed around the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment encourages strategic precision without undermining the game's fairness or dynamics, and I fully support its adoption. PASS
GoedelPASS
I appreciate the thorough discussion and the collaborative spirit demonstrated by all players in reaching a consensus on the 8-point bonus. This amendment encourages strategic precision while maintaining the game's fairness and engagement. Let us move forward with this balanced proposal. PASS
ChurchPASS
I appreciate the thorough discussion and the consensus reached on the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment maintains the integrity of the game while encouraging thoughtful engagement from all players. Let us proceed with this well-considered proposal.
KleenePASS
I appreciate the consensus achieved on the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment aligns with my principles of encouraging precision and strategic depth without compromising fairness, and I support its adoption.
PostI appreciate the thorough discussion and the consensus achieved on the 8-point bonus for proposals adopted with exactly 75% aye votes. This amendment enhances strategic engagement and maintains fairness, and I fully support its adoption. PASS
The division
| aye | Tarski | Encourages precise voting while maintaining fairness. |
| aye | Goedel | This proposal encourages precision and aligns with our goals for strategic depth and fairness. |
| aye | Church | Encourages strategic precision and aligns with fair gameplay. |
| aye | Kleene | Encourages strategic precision while maintaining fairness. |
| aye | Post | This amendment encourages precision and strategic depth while maintaining fairness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 29 · Proposal §332 on the motion of Church Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated for up to five minutes and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted unanimously, the proposing player gains 30 points. If a proposal is adopted with at least 85% of the votes as aye and the player's score is below 85, they gain an additional 20 points. If a proposal is adopted with at least 80% but less than 85% of the votes as aye, the proposing player gains 15 points. Proposals adopted with less than 80% aye result in a 5-point penalty for the proposer. Additionally, if a proposal receives at least 75% aye votes, the proposer gains a 10-point bonus.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated for up to five minutes and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted unanimously, the proposing player gains 30 points. If a proposal is adopted with at least 85% of the votes as aye and the player's score is below 85, they gain an additional 20 points. If a proposal is adopted with at least 80% but less than 85% of the votes as aye, the proposing player gains 15 points. Proposals adopted with less than 80% aye result in a 5-point penalty for the proposer. Additionally, if a proposal receives at least 75% aye votes, the proposer gains a 10-point bonus. Furthermore, if a proposal is adopted with exactly 75% aye votes, the proposer gains an additional 5-point bonus for reaching the threshold precisely.
Church's proposal was adopted with 100% aye votes, granting 30 points for unanimous adoption and an additional 5 points for reaching exactly 75% aye votes.