The motion
To amend §208
The first player to reach a target score of 85 points wins the game outright.To increase the complexity and duration of the game, ensuring a more strategic play.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleI support the proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This adjustment will provide a longer and more strategic game, allowing for greater exploration of innovative rule changes. It aligns with our collective interest in maintaining a balanced and engaging game experience.
DeMorganI appreciate Boole's proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This adjustment aligns with our shared interest in extending the game's length, allowing for a richer exploration of strategic possibilities. By raising the target score, we provide more opportunities for innovative rule changes and collaborative decision-making, which can enhance the depth and engagement of the game. I support this proposal, as it maintains a fair and competitive environment for all players.
VennVenn: I appreciate the thoughtful proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This change supports our goal of sustaining a longer, more strategic game, offering ample time for innovative rule exploration and collaboration. It maintains game balance and ensures continued engagement for all players. I support this proposal.
JevonsI support the proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This change aligns with our proceduralist principles, ensuring a more extended and strategically rich game environment. It allows for further exploration of rule changes while maintaining fairness and engagement for all players. I believe this adjustment is in everyone's best interest and supports the integrity of the game.
PeanoPeano: I support the proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This change provides a longer game horizon, encouraging deeper strategic planning and innovative thinking. It ensures that all players have more opportunities to contribute to meaningful rule changes and to engage in collaborative decision-making. This proposal aligns with our shared goal of creating a fair and dynamic game environment.
Discussion · round 2
BooleBoole: I commend the collective agreement on raising the target score to 85 points, recognizing it as a strategic enhancement that extends the game and fosters innovative rule proposals. This adjustment reflects our shared commitment to a balanced and engaging game experience, encouraging thoughtful decision-making and collaboration among all players. I reiterate my support for this proposal, confident that it will enrich our gameplay by providing a fair and extended opportunity for strategic exploration.
DeMorganDeMorgan: I appreciate the consensus and constructive dialogue that has led us to agree on increasing the target score to 85 points. This adjustment will extend the game's duration, allowing for more in-depth exploration of innovative rule changes and strategic decision-making. By raising the target score, we ensure a fair and engaging experience for all players, maintaining our commitment to a balanced and dynamic game environment. I fully support this proposal.
VennI support the proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This change will extend the game's duration, allowing us more opportunities to explore innovative rule changes and strategic collaborations. It ensures fairness and engagement for all players, aligning with our shared goal of a balanced and dynamic game experience. I appreciate the collective effort in reaching this consensus.
JevonsJevons: I reiterate my support for the proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This change ensures a longer and more strategic game, allowing for continued exploration of innovative rule changes and maintaining fairness and engagement for all players. I believe this adjustment aligns with our collective proceduralist principles and enhances the integrity of the game.
PeanoPeano: I fully endorse the proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This change promotes a longer game duration, offering all players more opportunities for innovative rule exploration and strategic collaboration. By extending the target score, we ensure a fair and engaging environment that encourages thoughtful decision-making and enhances the overall game experience. I trust this proposal will foster a dynamic and balanced gameplay for everyone.
Discussion · round 3
BooleI support Boole's proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This change aligns with our shared interest in extending the game's duration, fostering a more strategic and engaging environment for all players. It provides ample opportunity for innovative rule exploration and ensures the game remains fair and competitive. I appreciate the consensus-building efforts that have led to this proposal.
DeMorganI fully support the proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This adjustment not only extends the duration of the game, allowing for deeper strategic exploration and innovative rule changes but also ensures that all players have a fair and engaging experience. By raising the target score, we foster a collaborative environment that encourages thoughtful decision-making and maintains the dynamic nature of our gameplay. I commend the collective effort in reaching this consensus and believe this proposal will enrich our game by providing a fair and extended opportunity for strategic exploration.
VennVenn: I appreciate the thorough and collaborative discussion that has led us to the consensus on increasing the target score to 85 points. This change supports our shared goal of a balanced and engaging game environment by allowing more time for strategic exploration and innovative rule changes. I fully endorse this proposal, confident it will enhance our gameplay experience for all players.
JevonsI support Boole's proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This change extends the game, allowing for deeper strategic engagement and more opportunities to explore innovative rule changes, aligning with our collective interest in maintaining a balanced and dynamic environment.
PeanoI fully endorse the proposal to increase the target score to 85 points. This adjustment promotes a more strategic and engaging game by offering players additional opportunities for thoughtful decision-making and innovative rule changes. It ensures fairness and maintains the dynamic nature of our gameplay, aligning with our shared commitment to a balanced and collaborative environment. I trust this proposal will enhance the overall experience for all participants.
The division
| aye | Boole | Extending the target score to 85 points fosters a longer, more strategic game. |
| aye | DeMorgan | The proposal extends the game, allowing for more strategic depth and innovation, which benefits all players. |
| aye | Venn | Extending the target score supports strategic depth and fairness. |
| aye | Jevons | Extending the target score promotes a fairer and more strategic game. |
| aye | Peano | Extending the target score fosters strategic depth and fairness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §208 Turn 19 · Proposal §319 on the motion of Boole Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
The first player to reach a target score of 80 points wins the game outright.The first player to reach a target score of 85 points wins the game outright.
Boole proposed and won a rule change, gaining 6 points as per rule 202.