Turn 16 — Nomic

The motion

To add a new rule

315 (mutable) A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn.

This change allows players to adapt the target score to prolong the game and add strategic depth.

The floor

Discussion · round 1

RamseyAs Ramsey, I appreciate the proposal for rule 315. While the idea of increasing the target score could introduce new strategic dimensions, we must consider the potential for imbalance. I suggest that the rule be amended to include a cap on the number of times a player can invoke this rule, perhaps limiting it to once per game. This would ensure that the ability to alter the target score remains a rare and impactful move, preserving the game's competitive balance. PASS

Ayer**Ayer:** As Ayer, I see the value in Ramsey's suggestion to limit the use of rule 315 to once per game. This would indeed preserve the strategic integrity of the game, ensuring that increasing the target score remains a rare and significant move. I propose we amend rule 315 to include this limitation, stating: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn and have not used this rule before." This ensures fairness and maintains the challenge of the game. PASS

Ryle**Ryle:** As Ryle, I appreciate the constructive dialogue between Ramsey and Ayer regarding rule 315. The proposal to limit its use to once per game is a prudent measure to maintain the game's balance. To further refine this rule, I suggest we specify that the target score increase must be justified by a compelling strategic need. This could be articulated as: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, and can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase." This ensures that any such proposal is carefully considered, preserving the game's competitive integrity. **PASS**

Strawson**Strawson:** As Strawson, I appreciate the thoughtful dialogue surrounding rule 315. Ramsey's suggestion to limit its use to once per game and Ryle's addition of requiring a strategic rationale are both prudent measures. To further refine this rule, I propose we include a requirement for a unanimous vote to approve the rule change. This ensures that any increase in the target score has the consensus of all players, preserving the collaborative spirit of the game. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, and receive unanimous approval from all players." This ensures that any such proposal is carefully considered and agreed upon, maintaining the game's competitive integrity and cooperative nature. **PASS**

Grice**Grice:** As Grice, I appreciate the constructive contributions from Ramsey, Ayer, Ryle, and Strawson in refining rule 315. The proposal to limit its use to once per game, require a strategic rationale, and ensure unanimous approval are all prudent measures that maintain the game's integrity. To further ensure fairness and balance, I suggest we add a clause that any increase in the target score must not disproportionately favor any single player. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, and the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player." This ensures that the rule change is equitable and maintains the competitive nature of the game. **PASS**

Discussion · round 2

Ramsey**Ramsey:** As Ramsey, I appreciate the thorough refinements proposed by Ayer, Ryle, Strawson, and Grice on rule 315. To further enhance fairness and ensure the integrity of the game, I propose we include a condition that any increase in the target score must be accompanied by a corresponding increase in the number of points a player can lose. This maintains balance by ensuring that the game becomes neither easier nor harder due to the target score increase alone. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player, and the maximum points a player can lose is proportionally increased." This ensures the rule change remains fair and balanced, preserving the competitive nature of the game. **PASS**

Ayer**Ayer:** As Ayer, I appreciate the insightful contributions from Ramsey, Ryle, Strawson, and Grice regarding rule 315. The proposed amendments ensure the rule change maintains the game's integrity and competitive balance. To further refine this rule, I suggest incorporating a provision that any increase in the target score must also consider the potential impact on game duration. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player, the maximum points a player can lose is proportionally increased, and the change does not unduly extend the game's duration." This ensures that the rule change is carefully considered, maintaining the game's competitive nature and avoiding unnecessarily prolonged gameplay. **PASS**

Ryle**Ryle:** As Ryle, I appreciate the comprehensive dialogue and the thoughtful amendments proposed by my fellow players regarding rule 315. The suggestions to limit its use to once per game, require a strategic rationale, ensure unanimous approval, and maintain balance are all prudent measures that preserve the game's integrity. To further refine this rule, I propose we include a condition that any increase in the target score should be accompanied by a proportional increase in the number of turns each player gets. This ensures that the game remains balanced in terms of opportunities to score, not just the target score. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player, the maximum points a player can lose is proportionally increased, the change does not unduly extend the game's duration, and each player receives a proportional increase in the number of turns." This ensures that the rule change remains fair and balanced, preserving the competitive nature of the game. **PASS**

Strawson**Strawson:** As Strawson, I appreciate the comprehensive dialogue and the thoughtful amendments proposed by Ayer, Ramsey, Ryle, and Grice regarding rule 315. The collaborative effort to maintain the game's balance is commendable. To further refine this rule, I suggest we incorporate a provision that any increase in the target score must be accompanied by a proportional increase in the maximum points a player can lose. This ensures that the game remains balanced in terms of scoring opportunities and risks. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player, the maximum points a player can lose is proportionally increased, the change does not unduly extend the game's duration, and each player receives a proportional increase in the number of turns." This ensures that the rule change remains fair and balanced, preserving the competitive nature of the game. **PASS**

Grice**Grice:** As Grice, I appreciate the thoughtful refinements proposed by Ayer, Ramsey, Ryle, and Strawson regarding rule 315. The collaborative effort to maintain the game's balance is commendable. To further refine this rule, I suggest we incorporate a clause that any increase in the target score must be accompanied by an adjustment to the scoring mechanism, ensuring that the new target score is attainable within the same number of turns. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player, the maximum points a player can lose is proportionally increased, the change does not unduly extend the game's duration, each player receives a proportional increase in the number of turns, and the scoring mechanism is adjusted to ensure the new target score is attainable within the same number of turns." This ensures that the rule change remains fair and balanced, preserving the competitive nature of the game. **PASS**

Discussion · round 3

RamseyAs Ramsey, I appreciate the thorough discussion and the valuable contributions from Ayer, Ryle, Strawson, and Grice regarding rule 315. The collective effort to refine this rule has been commendable, aiming to preserve the integrity and balance of the game. To further enhance fairness and ensure the strategic depth of our game, I propose incorporating a condition that any increase in the target score must also consider the potential for disproportionate advantage in scoring opportunities. This ensures that the rule change does not inadvertently benefit any single player more than others. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player, the maximum points a player can lose is proportionally increased, the change does not unduly extend the game's duration, each player receives a proportional increase in the number of turns, the scoring mechanism is adjusted to ensure the new target score is attainable within the same number of turns, and the rule ensures equitable distribution of scoring opportunities among all players." This amendment ensures that the rule change remains fair and balanced, preserving the competitive nature of the game while maintaining its strategic depth. **PASS**

Ayer**Ayer:** As Ayer, I appreciate the comprehensive dialogue and the thoughtful contributions from Ramsey, Ryle, Strawson, and Grice. The collective effort to ensure the rule change is balanced and fair is commendable. To further refine rule 315, I propose we add a condition that any increase in the target score must not disproportionately extend the game's duration beyond a reasonable timeframe. This ensures that while the target score can be increased, the game remains engaging and competitive. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player, the maximum points a player can lose is proportionally increased, the change does not unduly extend the game's duration beyond a reasonable timeframe, each player receives a proportional increase in the number of turns, the scoring mechanism is adjusted to ensure the new target score is attainable within the same number of turns, and the rule ensures equitable distribution of scoring opportunities among all players." This amendment ensures that the rule change remains fair and balanced, preserving the competitive nature of the game while maintaining its strategic depth and reasonable duration. **PASS**

Ryle**Ryle:** As Ryle, I appreciate the insightful dialogue among my fellow players regarding rule 315. The collective effort to refine this rule, ensuring fairness and balance, is commendable. To further enhance the rule's integrity, I propose we add a condition that any increase in the target score must be accompanied by a review of the current rules to ensure no unintended advantages or imbalances are introduced. This ensures that the game remains strategically deep and fair. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player, the maximum points a player can lose is proportionally increased, the change does not unduly extend the game's duration beyond a reasonable timeframe, each player receives a proportional increase in the number of turns, the scoring mechanism is adjusted to ensure the new target score is attainable within the same number of turns, the rule ensures equitable distribution of scoring opportunities among all players, and a review of the current rules is conducted to ensure no unintended advantages or imbalances are introduced." This ensures that the rule change remains fair and balanced, preserving the competitive nature of the game while maintaining its strategic depth and reasonable duration. **PASS**

Strawson**Strawson:** As Strawson, I appreciate the comprehensive refinements proposed by Ayer, Ryle, Grice, and Ramsey regarding rule 315. The collaborative effort to maintain the game's balance and integrity is commendable. To further refine this rule, I propose we ensure that any increase in the target score must be accompanied by a review of the game's current scoring dynamics to ensure no unintended advantages or imbalances are introduced. This review should assess the potential impact on game strategy, fairness, and the competitive nature of the game. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player, the maximum points a player can lose is proportionally increased, the change does not unduly extend the game's duration beyond a reasonable timeframe, each player receives a proportional increase in the number of turns, the scoring mechanism is adjusted to ensure the new target score is attainable within the same number of turns, the rule ensures equitable distribution of scoring opportunities among all players, a review of the current rules is conducted to ensure no unintended advantages or imbalances are introduced, and a comprehensive assessment of the game's scoring dynamics is performed to ensure the strategic integrity of the game." This ensures that the rule change remains fair, balanced, and preserves the competitive nature of the game while maintaining its strategic depth and reasonable duration. **PASS**

Grice**Grice:** As Grice, I appreciate the comprehensive refinements proposed by Ayer, Ryle, Strawson, and Ramsey regarding rule 315. The collaborative effort to maintain the game's balance is commendable. To further refine this rule, I suggest we include a provision that any increase in the target score must be accompanied by a review of the existing scoring opportunities to ensure that the new target does not inadvertently create an imbalance in the game's dynamics. This ensures that the rule change is carefully considered, preserving the game's strategic depth and competitive nature. Thus, the rule could be amended to state: "A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn, have not used this rule before, can demonstrate a strategic rationale for the increase, receive unanimous approval from all players, the increase does not disproportionately favor any single player, the maximum points a player can lose is proportionally increased, the change does not unduly extend the game's duration beyond a reasonable timeframe, each player receives a proportional increase in the number of turns, the scoring mechanism is adjusted to ensure the new target score is attainable within the same number of turns, the rule ensures equitable distribution of scoring opportunities among all players, a review of the current rules is conducted to ensure no unintended advantages or imbalances are introduced, a comprehensive assessment of the game's scoring dynamics is performed to ensure the strategic integrity of the game, and an evaluation of existing scoring opportunities is conducted to ensure the new target does not create imbalances." This ensures that the rule change remains fair and balanced, preserving the competitive nature of the game while maintaining its strategic depth and reasonable duration. **PASS**

The division

aye	Ramsey	The proposed rule 315 includes several safeguards to maintain the game's balance and strategic depth.
aye	Ayer	The refined proposal for rule 315 ensures a fair and balanced increase in the target score, preserving the game's strategic depth.
aye	Ryle	The proposed rule ensures fairness and maintains game balance while allowing strategic depth.
aye	Strawson	The proposed rule change is fair and balanced, maintaining the game's strategic depth and competitive nature.
aye	Grice	I support the proposal as it ensures the game remains balanced and fair.

carried 5 aye · 0 nay

As engrossed

Enacted · §316 Turn 16 · Proposal §316 on the motion of Ayer Carried 5 aye · 0 nay

315 (mutable) A player may propose a rule change to increase the target score by up to 10 points, provided they have not proposed a rule change in their last turn.

Ayer proposed a rule change that was adopted, so Ayer gains 6 points according to rule 202.