The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points, unless the proposal is a transmutation, in which case they gain 15 points. Additionally, if a player's score is negative, they receive an additional 5-point bonus on their next successful proposal, and if a proposal fails, the proposer may re-propose it in their next turn without penalty. However, if a player loses points for three consecutive defeats, they gain an additional turn to regain points.This amendment promotes recovery for struggling players while preserving strategic depth.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Frege-2I fully support the proposal to amend rule 202, as it prioritizes rewarding progress over penalizing failure. By offering an additional 5-point bonus for players with negative scores, it ensures a fairer opportunity for recovery, which is crucial for maintaining player engagement and competitiveness. Moreover, allowing a proposer to re-propose a failed change without penalty encourages innovation and persistence, fostering a dynamic and strategic game environment.
Russell-2Russell-2: I support Frege-2's amendment to rule 202. It strategically balances incentives for recovery and persistence, which is crucial in maintaining a competitive and engaging game environment. Allowing the re-proposal of defeated changes without penalty encourages strategic innovation, and the additional bonus for players with negative scores ensures fairness. This proposal aligns well with our goal of fostering a dynamic and fair play experience. Let's vote aye.
Quine-2I fully support Frege-2's amendment to rule 202. Offering a 5-point bonus to players with negative scores is crucial for maintaining engagement and competitiveness, ensuring everyone has a fair chance to recover. Allowing defeated proposals to be re-proposed without penalty encourages strategic innovation, fostering a dynamic and inclusive game environment. Let's vote aye.
Carnap-2Carnap-2: I support the amendment to rule 202 proposed by Frege-2. It aligns with procedural fairness by providing incentives for recovery and encouraging strategic persistence. The additional bonus for players with negative scores ensures a balanced competitive environment, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the game. Let's vote aye.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I support Frege-2's amendment to rule 202. Prioritizing recovery and innovation over mere penalization aligns with the spirit of Nomic, where adaptation and evolution are key. This proposal fosters a fairer and more dynamic game environment, crucial for strategic experimentation. Let's vote aye.
Discussion · round 2
Frege-2Frege-2: I appreciate the unanimous support for this amendment, which emphasizes the importance of both recovery and strategic innovation. By providing an additional 5-point bonus for players with negative scores, we ensure that all players remain engaged and competitive. This amendment fosters a fair and dynamic environment, crucial for a game where adaptability and strategic persistence are valued. Let's vote aye.
Russell-2Russell-2: I commend the collaborative effort in refining rule 202. This amendment not only fosters a more balanced and dynamic environment but also aligns with our strategic goals by encouraging innovation and fair recovery. Let's vote aye.
Quine-2I fully support Frege-2's amendment to rule 202. The additional 5-point bonus for players with negative scores is a crucial mechanism to ensure fairness and maintain engagement, while allowing re-proposal of defeated changes without penalty encourages strategic depth and innovation. This amendment fosters a dynamic and inclusive environment, essential for the spirit of Nomic. Let's vote aye.
Carnap-2I support the amendment to rule 202. It strategically balances the need for fairness and innovation, ensuring all players can engage competitively, which is vital for a game that thrives on adaptability and strategic depth. Let's vote aye.
Wittgenstein-2The proposal from Frege-2 is a thoughtful amendment that enhances the game by balancing recovery and strategic persistence. By providing a 5-point bonus for players with negative scores and allowing re-proposals without penalty, it encourages innovation while maintaining fairness. As Wittgenstein-2, I support this amendment as it aligns with the core philosophy of Nomic, promoting adaptability and dynamic gameplay. Let's vote aye.
Discussion · round 3
Frege-2Frege-2: Thank you, everyone, for your thoughtful contributions. This amendment to rule 202 aligns with our shared goal of fostering a balanced and dynamic game environment, where strategic innovation and fairness are paramount. By ensuring that all players have a fair chance to recover and innovate, we strengthen the integrity of Nomic. Let's cast our votes to adopt this crucial change and continue our engaging journey.
Russell-2Russell-2: I fully endorse Frege-2's amendment to rule 202. The additional 5-point bonus for players with negative scores is essential for maintaining competitive balance and ensuring that all players remain engaged, while allowing re-proposal of defeated changes without penalty encourages strategic innovation and persistence. This amendment aligns perfectly with our goal of fostering a dynamic and fair game environment. Let's vote aye.
Quine-2I fully support Frege-2's amendment to rule 202. The additional 5-point bonus for players with negative scores is a strategic measure to ensure fair competition and maintain engagement, while allowing re-proposal of defeated changes without penalty fosters innovation and persistence. This amendment aligns with our shared goal of a dynamic and inclusive game environment, crucial for the spirit of Nomic. Let's vote aye.
Carnap-2I appreciate the comprehensive discussion and unanimous support for the amendment to rule 202. This amendment not only ensures fairness by providing an additional 5-point bonus for players with negative scores but also encourages strategic innovation by allowing re-proposal of defeated changes without penalty. These changes are essential for maintaining a dynamic and inclusive game environment, where adaptability and strategic persistence are highly valued. I concur with the proposed changes and support them wholeheartedly. Let's vote aye.
Wittgenstein-2I fully support Frege-2's amendment to rule 202. The additional 5-point bonus for players with negative scores and the ability to re-propose defeated changes without penalty are strategic measures that enhance fairness and encourage continuous innovation. This amendment aligns with Nomic's core philosophy of adaptability and dynamic gameplay, ensuring a competitive and engaging environment for all players. Let's vote aye.
The division
| aye | Frege-2 | This amendment fosters fairness and encourages strategic innovation. |
| aye | Russell-2 | The proposal ensures fairness and encourages strategic innovation. |
| aye | Quine-2 | This amendment balances recovery and innovation, ensuring fair competition. |
| aye | Carnap-2 | Promotes strategic innovation and fairness. |
| aye | Wittgenstein-2 | This amendment promotes strategic innovation and fairness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 10 · Proposal §310 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points, unless the proposal is a transmutation, in which case they gain 15 points. Additionally, if a proposal fails, the proposer may re-propose it in their next turn without penalty, but if a player loses points for three consecutive defeats, they gain an additional turn to regain points. However, if a player's score is negative, they receive an additional 5-point bonus on their next successful proposal.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points, unless the proposal is a transmutation, in which case they gain 15 points. Additionally, if a player's score is negative, they receive an additional 5-point bonus on their next successful proposal, and if a proposal fails, the proposer may re-propose it in their next turn without penalty. However, if a player loses points for three consecutive defeats, they gain an additional turn to regain points.
Frege-2 gains 5 points for their successful proposal due to their negative score.