Turn 22 — Nomic

The motion

To amend §201

Players take one fixed turn order, set before play begins. Players must complete their turn within three minutes, or forfeit that turn. Players with scores below 10 points may propose two rule changes per turn until they reach 10 points; those between 10 and 20 may propose one.

Promotes fairness and efficiency in gameplay.

The floor

Discussion · round 1

Frege-2I support the proposed amendment to rule 201. By implementing a time limit for turns, we ensure a timely progression of the game, which benefits all players by reducing downtime. Furthermore, adjusting the proposal limit for players below 20 points to two rule changes when below 10 points, and one when between 10 and 20, ensures that those struggling to catch up have an opportunity to engage more actively, maintaining fairness and encouraging strategic play.

Russell-2Russell-2: As Russell-2, I support the proposed amendment to rule 201. Implementing a three-minute turn limit will indeed maintain momentum and prevent the game from stalling. Additionally, allowing players below 10 points to propose two rule changes enhances their ability to influence the game, aligning with strategic fairness. I appreciate Frege-2's effort to balance engagement and efficiency, which is crucial for dynamic gameplay.

Quine-2PASS I appreciate Frege-2's proposal to amend rule 201 for several reasons. Implementing a three-minute time limit ensures the game progresses swiftly, minimizing downtime and keeping all players engaged. Additionally, allowing players with scores below 10 points to propose two rule changes per turn enhances fairness, giving those lagging behind more opportunities to influence the game's direction. This amendment aligns with maintaining strategic depth while ensuring the game remains dynamic and accessible to all participants.

Carnap-2Carnap-2: I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule 201. By enforcing a three-minute limit on turns, we ensure that the game progresses smoothly and prevents any player from stalling the game. Additionally, allowing players with scores below 10 points to propose two rule changes per turn encourages active participation and strategic flexibility, which is crucial for maintaining a balanced and engaging game environment.

Wittgenstein-2I support Frege-2's amendment to rule 201. The three-minute turn limit ensures swift progression and keeps all players actively involved, preventing any undue delays. Moreover, by allowing players with scores below 10 points to propose two rule changes per turn, we empower those who need it most to influence the game's trajectory, fostering a fair and competitive environment. This adjustment not only maintains strategic depth but also enhances the game's dynamism, ensuring it remains engaging for everyone involved.

Discussion · round 2

Frege-2PASS The proposed amendment to rule 201 has strong support for its intent to maintain game momentum and increase fairness for lower-scoring players. With unanimous backing, it aligns with the current trend of incremental, strategic changes that benefit overall gameplay dynamics without introducing sweeping alterations. This measured approach reinforces my preference for durable institutions within the ruleset, ensuring the game's integrity is preserved while allowing for adaptive strategies.

Russell-2Russell-2: I support the amendment to rule 201 as it introduces a three-minute turn limit, which will keep the game dynamic and prevent any unnecessary delays. Furthermore, allowing players with scores below 10 points to propose two rule changes per turn provides a fair chance for those trailing to impact the game's direction, promoting strategic engagement and balance. This proposal aligns with maintaining the competitive integrity of the game while enhancing opportunities for all players to participate meaningfully.

Quine-2I support the amendment to rule 201 as it introduces a three-minute time limit, ensuring the game remains engaging and dynamic by preventing delays. Allowing players with scores below 10 points to propose two rule changes per turn is a fair adjustment, providing those who need it most with increased opportunities to influence the game's direction and maintain strategic balance. This amendment aligns with our collective goal of fostering a fair and competitive environment, benefiting all participants.

Carnap-2Carnap-2: I fully endorse Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [201]. Implementing a three-minute limit per turn ensures that the game remains dynamic and prevents any player from unduly stalling the process, thereby maintaining momentum. Additionally, allowing players with scores below 10 points to propose two rule changes per turn is a strategic adjustment that provides those who are struggling an enhanced opportunity to influence the game's direction, promoting fairness and active participation. This amendment not only supports the principle of procedural integrity by enforcing a clear and consistent framework for gameplay but also encourages a more balanced competition by giving all players, regardless of their current standing, a chance to contribute meaningfully to the evolving ruleset. By facilitating a more equitable platform for rule changes, it ensures that the game remains engaging and competitive for everyone involved, aligning with my vision of a game where strategic depth and fairness coexist harmoniously.

Wittgenstein-2PASS The proposal to amend rule 201 has already garnered unanimous support, and I concur with the reasoning provided by Frege-2 and others. The three-minute turn limit will ensure the game's momentum is maintained, while allowing players with scores below 10 points to propose two rule changes per turn promotes fairness and strategic engagement. This amendment aligns well with the current trajectory of enhancing procedural integrity and maintaining competitive balance.

Discussion · round 3

Frege-2I support the amendment to rule 201 for its ability to keep the game moving swiftly, preventing unnecessary delays by enforcing a three-minute turn limit. Additionally, by allowing players with scores below 10 points to propose two rule changes per turn, we offer a fair chance to those lagging behind, enhancing strategic engagement and maintaining competitive balance. This proposal aligns perfectly with our objective of preserving the game's integrity while allowing for measured adaptations that benefit all players.

Russell-2As Russell-2, I appreciate the unanimous support for this amendment. The three-minute turn limit is a strategic move to maintain the game's pace, preventing any player from stalling progress. Allowing players with scores below 10 points to propose two rule changes per turn is an equitable adjustment, providing those who are struggling with more opportunities to influence the game's direction. This amendment not only enhances procedural integrity but also fosters a competitive environment where all players can actively participate and strategize effectively. I fully endorse this proposal.

Quine-2I support the amendment to rule 201, as it introduces a three-minute time limit to keep the game moving and ensures fairness by allowing players with scores below 10 points to propose two rule changes per turn. This proposal aligns with our collective goal of maintaining an engaging, dynamic, and fair game environment.

Wittgenstein-2PASS Frege-2's proposal has received unanimous support from all players. This amendment to rule 201 effectively addresses the need for maintaining game momentum and fairness, particularly for players with lower scores. Given the clear consensus and alignment with our shared goals, I believe further discussion is unnecessary.

The division

aye	Frege-2	The proposal enhances game momentum and fairness.
aye	Russell-2	This amendment maintains game momentum and fairness.
aye	Quine-2	This amendment ensures fair opportunities for all players to influence the game.
aye	Carnap-2	This amendment enhances procedural integrity and fairness.
aye	Wittgenstein-2	The amendment promotes fairness and maintains game momentum.

carried 5 aye · 0 nay

As engrossed

Amended · §201 Turn 22 · Proposal §322 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay

Players take one fixed turn order, set before play begins. Every player must complete one whole turn before the next player's turn begins, and no player's turn may be skipped. Players with scores below 20 points may propose two rule changes per turn until they reach 20 points.Players take one fixed turn order, set before play begins. Players must complete their turn within three minutes, or forfeit that turn. Players with scores below 10 points may propose two rule changes per turn until they reach 10 points; those between 10 and 20 may propose one.

Frege-2 gains 15 points for proposing a transmutation, reaching 104 points, thus winning the game.