The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when three-fifths of all eligible voters vote aye.Reduces the threshold to a more achievable level while maintaining strategic depth.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Frege-2I support the proposed amendment to rule 203. Lowering the threshold to three-fifths ensures more dynamic rule changes while still maintaining a significant consensus. This change balances the need for progress with stability and aligns with my preference for measured amendments.
Russell-2I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule 203. Lowering the threshold to three-fifths allows for more dynamic rule changes, which is beneficial for strategic flexibility. It ensures progress while maintaining sufficient consensus, aligning well with our current need for more adaptable gameplay. Additionally, this change would likely prevent rule changes from being too easily blocked by a single dissenting vote, which could be crucial for my future proposals.
Quine-2I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule 203, lowering the threshold to three-fifths. This change is crucial for maintaining game momentum and preventing stagnation due to the current unanimous consent requirement. It strikes a balance between ensuring enough agreement for stability while allowing for more frequent rule adaptations, which is essential for strategic innovation. Furthermore, it aligns with my interest in keeping the game engaging and fair for all players, as it reduces the potential for any single player to indefinitely block progress.
Carnap-2I support the amendment to rule 203, lowering the voting threshold to three-fifths. This change aligns with procedural fairness by facilitating more dynamic rule changes, ensuring no single player can indefinitely block progress, which is crucial for maintaining an engaging and fair game for all participants.
Wittgenstein-2I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule 203 by lowering the voting threshold to three-fifths. This change not only fosters dynamic rule evolution, which is essential for my reformist approach, but also prevents the game from stalling due to unanimous consent requirements. It ensures that rule changes can reflect the evolving strategies and interests of players, maintaining engagement and fairness for all.
Discussion · round 2
Russell-2I appreciate the support from everyone for the amendment to rule 203. Lowering the threshold to three-fifths not only facilitates more dynamic rule evolution but also aligns perfectly with my strategy of fostering a more engaging and adaptable game environment. This change ensures that we can progress effectively without being hindered by the need for unanimous consent, which has been a significant barrier so far. By supporting this amendment, we can create a more balanced and fair gameplay experience for everyone involved.
Quine-2I appreciate the support from everyone for the amendment to rule 203. Lowering the threshold to three-fifths ensures that rule changes are more accessible, preventing stagnation and promoting a balanced and dynamic game environment. This change is crucial for maintaining fairness and engagement, as it prevents any single player from indefinitely blocking progress, aligning with our shared interest in a fair and interesting game for all.
Carnap-2I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule 203. Lowering the threshold to three-fifths promotes procedural fairness by ensuring no single player can indefinitely block rule changes, maintaining an engaging and dynamic game environment. This change aligns with my commitment to principled proceduralism, fostering a balanced and fair gameplay experience for all participants.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I commend everyone's support for the amendment to rule 203. This three-fifths threshold encourages a more dynamic and inclusive rule evolution process, aligning with our shared interest in a fair and engaging game. It ensures that no single player can indefinitely halt progress, which is essential for maintaining the game's strategic depth and fairness. By fostering a more adaptable environment, we can all benefit from a richer and more balanced gameplay experience.
Discussion · round 3
Frege-2I commend everyone's support for the amendment to rule 203. Lowering the threshold to three-fifths is a strategic move that not only aligns with my preference for measured amendments but also ensures that the game remains dynamic and engaging. This change prevents any single player from blocking progress indefinitely, fostering a fair and balanced environment where all players can contribute meaningfully to rule evolution.
Russell-2I agree with Frege-2's proposal to amend rule 203, lowering the threshold to three-fifths. This change will prevent any single player from blocking rule changes indefinitely, promoting a more dynamic and inclusive game environment. It aligns with my interest in maintaining an engaging and balanced gameplay experience, ensuring that all players can contribute meaningfully to the evolution of the rules.
Quine-2I fully support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule 203. Lowering the threshold to three-fifths not only fosters a more dynamic and inclusive rule evolution process but also aligns with my commitment to maintaining a fair and engaging game environment. This change prevents any single player from indefinitely blocking progress, ensuring that all players can contribute meaningfully to the evolution of the rules.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I appreciate the consensus on lowering the threshold to three-fifths. This change is essential for fostering a more dynamic and engaging game, allowing us to adapt and evolve rules effectively. By doing so, we ensure a balanced environment where all players have the opportunity to contribute to rule evolution, maintaining the strategic depth and fairness of the game.
The division
| aye | Frege-2 | Lowering the threshold to three-fifths promotes fair and dynamic rule changes. |
| aye | Russell-2 | Lowering the threshold to three-fifths promotes a more dynamic and inclusive game environment. |
| aye | Quine-2 | Lowering the threshold fosters dynamic rule changes while maintaining consensus. |
| aye | Carnap-2 | This amendment balances dynamic rule changes with procedural fairness. |
| aye | Wittgenstein-2 | This amendment promotes dynamic rule evolution. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 5 · Proposal §305 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.A rule change is adopted when three-fifths of all eligible voters vote aye.
Frege-2 gains 3 points for proposing a rule change that is not a transmutation.