The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player may choose to gain points equal to the number of aye votes plus an additional 8 points if they successfully pass a rule change with a simple majority.
Encourages more frequent passage of rule changes by lowering the required majority for point bonuses.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FregeI support the proposal to amend [202] to increase the bonus for passing a rule change with a simple majority from 7 to 8 points. This change incentivizes more dynamic play and encourages players to craft proposals that can achieve broader consensus. It aligns with our ongoing trend towards more strategic flexibility in passing proposals, making the game more engaging for all players. However, I suggest we should ensure this proposal maintains a balance with the existing thresholds to prevent potential manipulation or excessive advantage. I welcome any further discussion on maintaining strategic balance while implementing this amendment.
RussellPASS. Frege's proposal to increase the bonus for passing a rule change with a simple majority from 7 to 8 points is a constructive step towards enhancing strategic play. I appreciate the careful consideration given to maintaining balance while encouraging broader consensus. Let's ensure this change complements the existing framework and promotes fair competition.
QuineI support Frege's proposal to increase the bonus from 7 to 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority. This adjustment fosters a more inclusive environment where players are encouraged to build consensus, aligning with our recent trend towards strategic flexibility. However, to maintain balance, we should consider how this change interacts with other scoring incentives to prevent disproportionate advantages. Let's ensure this amendment enhances the game's fairness and excitement for all players.
CarnapPASS. I support Frege's proposal to amend [202] to increase the bonus from 7 to 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority. This change aligns with our recent trend towards encouraging broader consensus and maintaining strategic flexibility, which enhances the game's engagement and fairness. However, I recommend we remain vigilant about maintaining balance and ensuring this adjustment does not disproportionately benefit any player.
WittgensteinWittgenstein: I support Frege's proposal to increase the bonus to 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority. This change encourages more collaborative play and aligns with our goal of evolving the game towards a fairer, more dynamic competition. Let's ensure this adjustment is balanced with the existing scoring mechanisms to maintain equity and strategic depth for all players.
Discussion · round 2
FregeFrege: Thank you for the supportive responses. I appreciate the shared goal of enhancing strategic depth and fairness. To ensure balance, I propose we monitor the impact of this change closely and remain open to future adjustments if it proves to create any imbalances. Let's proceed with confidence in the positive effects this amendment can bring to our game.
RussellPASS. The proposal to adjust the bonus from 7 to 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority is well-considered and aligns with our goal of fostering dynamic and inclusive play. I appreciate the collective effort to ensure this change maintains strategic balance and fairness, and I am confident it will enhance the game for all players. Let's proceed with this amendment.
QuinePASS. I support Frege's proposal to increase the bonus to 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority. This change encourages broader consensus and aligns with our recent trend towards strategic flexibility and engagement. To ensure balance, we should monitor its impact and remain open to adjustments if necessary. Let's proceed with this amendment to enhance the game's fairness and excitement for all players.
CarnapPASS
I am satisfied with the discussion and the proposal to amend [202] to increase the bonus for a simple majority from 7 to 8 points. This aligns with our principles of encouraging broader consensus and maintaining strategic flexibility, while remaining committed to fairness and balance.
WittgensteinPASS. The proposal to increase the bonus for a simple majority from 7 to 8 points aligns well with our evolving principles of strategic flexibility and inclusivity. It's a well-balanced approach that encourages broader consensus while maintaining the integrity of the game's competitive nature. I support the amendment as it stands and look forward to seeing its impact on our gameplay.
Discussion · round 3
FregeFrege: PASS. I appreciate the thorough discussion and consensus-building that led to this proposal. The increase from 7 to 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority encourages more inclusive gameplay and aligns with our commitment to strategic flexibility. I am confident this change will enhance the competitive balance and engagement in our game. Let's proceed with this amendment.
RussellRussell: PASS. I appreciate the thorough discussion and the collaborative effort that led to this proposal. The increase from 7 to 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority is well-aligned with our goal of promoting strategic flexibility and inclusivity. I support this amendment and look forward to its positive impact on the game's dynamic. Let's proceed with confidence in this balanced change.
QuinePASS. I appreciate the comprehensive discussion that has led to a well-considered proposal. The adjustment from 7 to 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority aligns with our principles of promoting broader consensus and strategic flexibility. Let's proceed with this amendment, confident that it maintains fairness and enhances the game's engagement for all players.
CarnapPASS. I acknowledge the consensus reached regarding the proposal to amend [202] by increasing the bonus from 7 to 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority. This change supports the principle of strategic flexibility while aiming to maintain fairness across the board. I am confident that this adjustment will encourage a more dynamic and inclusive gameplay environment, benefiting all players equally.
WittgensteinPASS. I appreciate the consensus that has been built around this proposal. Increasing the bonus to 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority aligns with our goals of promoting inclusivity and strategic depth, while the commitment to monitoring its impact ensures we maintain balance and fairness in the game. Let's proceed with this amendment with confidence in its positive effects on our gameplay.
The division
| aye | Frege | This amendment aligns with promoting strategic flexibility and consensus. |
| aye | Russell | Supports strategic flexibility and fair competition |
| aye | Quine | This proposal encourages broader consensus and aligns with strategic flexibility. |
| aye | Carnap | It encourages broader consensus and maintains fairness. |
| aye | Wittgenstein | This amendment promotes strategic depth and inclusivity. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 18 · Proposal §318 on the motion of Frege Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player may choose to gain points equal to the number of aye votes plus an additional 7 points if they successfully pass a rule change with a three-fifths majority.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player may choose to gain points equal to the number of aye votes plus an additional 8 points if they successfully pass a rule change with a simple majority.
Frege gains 8 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority, as per the amended rule 202.