The motion
To amend §208
The first player to reach a target score of 90 points wins the game outright.Lowering the score threshold makes the game more dynamic and competitive.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FregeFrege: I appreciate the past efforts to maintain strategic depth, but with the current scores, setting a target score of 90 points encourages continued engagement without prematurely ending the game. This amendment preserves the challenge while ensuring the game remains dynamic and competitive for all players.
RussellRussell: PASS. I appreciate Frege's proposal for a 90-point target, which maintains competitive balance. It encourages ongoing engagement and strategic play, aligning with our consensus-driven approach. I'm open to further discussion to ensure all players see this as a fair adjustment.
QuineQuine: I support Frege's proposal to lower the target score to 90 points. This change keeps the game dynamic and accessible, allowing more strategic opportunities without rushing towards an early conclusion. It maintains fairness and interest for all players, ensuring the competition remains engaging until the very end.
CarnapPASS. Frege's proposal to lower the target score to 90 points aligns with the principle of maintaining an engaging and dynamic game while preventing premature endings. It encourages strategic depth and competitiveness, ensuring all players remain active participants in the pursuit of victory.
WittgensteinWittgenstein: PASS. I support Frege's proposal to lower the target score to 90 points. This adjustment promotes strategic depth and keeps the game competitive, ensuring all players remain engaged until the end.
Discussion · round 2
FregePASS. I appreciate the consensus reached around lowering the target score to 90 points. This amendment maintains the strategic depth and competitive balance necessary for an engaging game, ensuring all players remain active and interested as we progress towards a clear conclusion.
RussellPASS. I'm pleased to see the consensus around lowering the target score to 90 points, as it effectively balances the need for strategic depth with the goal of keeping the game competitive and engaging for all players. This proposal aligns with our collaborative approach and ensures a fair and dynamic path toward victory.
QuineI concur with the consensus to lower the target score to 90 points. This amendment effectively balances maintaining strategic depth with ensuring the game remains dynamic and competitive for all players, thus aligning with our shared goal of a fair and engaging experience. PASS.
CarnapPASS. Frege's proposal to lower the target score to 90 points strikes a thoughtful balance between maintaining strategic depth and ensuring the game's competitive nature for all players. It aligns with our shared principles and keeps the game engaging, preventing any premature conclusion while still offering a clear path to victory.
WittgensteinWittgenstein: I commend the consensus reached on lowering the target score to 90 points. This amendment preserves the competitive spirit of Nomic, ensuring the game remains engaging and strategically rich for all players, without allowing any single player to dominate too early. It aligns with our shared goal of a dynamic and fair competition. PASS.
Discussion · round 3
FregeFrege: I'm glad we've reached a consensus on lowering the target score to 90 points. This amendment keeps the game engaging and strategic for everyone, ensuring no player is left at a disadvantage and that the competition remains exciting until the end. PASS.
RussellRussell: I fully support the proposal to lower the target score to 90 points. This amendment promotes a balanced and engaging game, encouraging strategic play and keeping the competition alive for all participants. PASS.
QuinePASS. I appreciate the thorough discussion and consensus reached on lowering the target score to 90 points. This amendment promotes strategic engagement and keeps the game competitive for all players, ensuring a fair and dynamic path toward victory.
CarnapPASS. I concur with the consensus reached to lower the target score to 90 points, as it maintains strategic depth and ensures competitive engagement for all players. This amendment aligns with our principles and keeps the game dynamic and fair, preventing any premature conclusion.
WittgensteinWittgenstein: I fully support the proposal to lower the target score to 90 points. This adjustment ensures the game remains engaging and balanced, allowing all players to strategize effectively without prematurely concluding the competition. PASS.
The division
| aye | Frege | The proposal maintains strategic engagement and competitive balance. |
| aye | Russell | Lowering the target score maintains engagement and strategic depth. |
| aye | Quine | Maintains strategic depth and competitive balance. |
| aye | Carnap | This amendment maintains strategic engagement and fairness for all players. |
| aye | Wittgenstein | This amendment maintains engagement and strategic depth for all players. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §208 Turn 20 · Proposal §320 on the motion of Frege Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
The first player to reach a target score of 120 points wins the game outright.The first player to reach a target score of 90 points wins the game outright.
Frege gains 15 points for passing a rule change with a simple majority, as per rule 204.