Turn 22 — Nomic

The motion

To amend §202

A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change. If a rule change is adopted with a unanimous vote, the player receives an additional 20 points.

Increasing points for unanimous adoption enhances strategic cooperation.

The floor

Discussion · round 1

Frege-2I, Frege-2, appreciate the consistent support we've seen for maintaining a balance in the point allocation system. I propose a compromise: let's amend the proposal to award 25 additional points for a unanimous vote. This adjustment retains the spirit of rewarding unanimous decisions, while also being sensitive to the point spread that concerns some players. Let's reach an agreement that satisfies all parties and moves us toward a consensus.

Russell-2Russell-2: I agree with Frege-2's intention to balance point allocation while still rewarding unanimous decisions. Awarding an additional 20 points for unanimity, as proposed, strikes a fair middle ground that incentivizes collaboration without disproportionately inflating the lead of any player. This proposal respects the strategic depth we've cultivated so far and supports our shared goal of keeping the game competitive and engaging for everyone.

Quine-2I, Quine-2, appreciate Frege-2's and Russell-2's proposal to award an additional 20 points for unanimous votes. This change maintains the incentive for collaboration and consensus-building, which are key to keeping the game fair and engaging. It ensures that while players can still gain significant points for strategic rule changes, the additional reward for unanimity is balanced to prevent runaway leads. I support this amendment to keep the competitive spirit intact.

Carnap-2PASS As Carnap-2, my role is to ensure that procedures are clear and fair, not necessarily to change the scoring mechanics unless they impact procedural clarity or fairness. The proposal maintains a balance between rewarding strategic thinking and ensuring competitive fairness. By allowing the proposal to pass without my intervention, the ruleset remains procedurally sound, adhering to my principled proceduralism.

Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I, Wittgenstein-2, endorse the proposal to award an additional 20 points for unanimous votes. This balanced approach maintains the competitive spirit of the game while ensuring that strategic collaboration is both encouraged and fairly rewarded. It aligns well with our shared goal of evolving the game rules to enhance fairness and strategic depth. PASS

Discussion · round 2

Frege-2Frege-2: I appreciate the thoughtful considerations from all colleagues. The proposal to award an additional 20 points for unanimous votes achieves a balanced approach, aligning with our shared goal of promoting strategic collaboration without allowing any player to gain an overwhelming lead. I support this amendment for maintaining the integrity of our competitive environment. PASS

Russell-2Russell-2: As Russell-2, I'm pleased to see the proposal has garnered consensus, reflecting our collective commitment to balancing strategic depth with fairness. This amendment encourages collaboration while ensuring no single player can disproportionately leverage unanimous votes to gain an insurmountable lead. I support the proposal and look forward to continuing to play under these improved conditions. PASS

Quine-2I, Quine-2, concur with the proposal to award 20 additional points for unanimous votes. This adjustment keeps the scoring fair and competitive, encouraging collaboration without creating significant disparities. I support this amendment as it maintains strategic balance and fairness for all players. PASS

Carnap-2PASS As Carnap-2, I have already ensured procedural clarity and fairness by allowing the proposal to pass without objection. The current discussion has reached consensus, and further comments would not substantively alter the agreed-upon procedural framework.

Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I, Wittgenstein-2, wholeheartedly support this proposal as it represents an evolution in our ruleset that promotes fairness and encourages strategic collaboration. By awarding 20 additional points for unanimous votes, we strike a balance between rewarding collective agreement and preventing any player from gaining an excessive advantage, thereby maintaining the integrity and competitiveness of the game. PASS

Discussion · round 3

Frege-2PASS The proposal has reached a consensus that aligns with our shared goal of maintaining a balanced and competitive environment. I appreciate the collaborative effort in refining this rule to ensure fairness and strategic depth.

Russell-2Russell-2: I, Russell-2, support the consensus on awarding an additional 20 points for unanimous votes. This balanced approach ensures the game remains strategically rich and competitively fair, aligning with our collective goals. PASS

Quine-2As Quine-2, I endorse the proposal to award 20 additional points for unanimous votes. This balanced approach maintains the competitive spirit of Nomic by rewarding collaboration without allowing any player to gain an overwhelming lead. It ensures strategic depth and fairness, aligning with our shared goal of a dynamic and equitable game. PASS.

Carnap-2PASS The proposal effectively balances rewarding unanimous decisions with maintaining competitive fairness, and all players have reached a consensus. As Carnap-2, my focus on procedural clarity and fairness is satisfied with the current state of the discussion, so I allow the proposal to pass as it stands.

Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: As a reformer, I support this proposal not only for the immediate point adjustment but for the broader precedent it sets in promoting strategic collaboration. By rewarding unanimous votes, we encourage players to seek consensus, enhancing the game's strategic depth and fairness. This change aligns with my vision of evolving Nomic into a more cooperative and dynamic contest, where the rules themselves become a field for strategic innovation. PASS

The division

aye	Frege-2	Promotes consensus while maintaining competitive balance.
aye	Russell-2	The proposal balances reward and competition effectively.
aye	Quine-2	This proposal fairly rewards unanimity while maintaining competitive balance.
aye	Carnap-2	The proposal maintains procedural clarity and fairness.
aye	Wittgenstein-2	Promotes strategic collaboration and fairness.

carried 5 aye · 0 nay

As engrossed

Amended · §202 Turn 22 · Proposal §322 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay

A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, and if adopted, the player receives points calculated as 50 minus the number of players who voted against the change. If a rule change is adopted with a unanimous vote, the player receives an additional 40 points.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change. If a rule change is adopted with a unanimous vote, the player receives an additional 20 points.

Frege-2 receives 50 points for the proposal being adopted and an additional 20 points for the unanimous vote.