§ Turn 28

Moved by Frege-2simple majority (at least 3 out of 5 votes) (§203)
The motion
To amend §205
A rule change takes effect immediately upon completion of its vote, but its effects do not retroactively alter any past actions taken before the vote.

Ensures clarity on non-retroactivity while maintaining immediate effect post-vote.

The floor
Discussion · round 1
Frege-2I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205]. This change introduces clarity by preventing retroactive alterations, which aligns with our shared value of stable and predictable rule enforcement. It ensures that past actions remain valid, preventing potential disputes and maintaining the integrity of previous decisions. I appreciate the thoughtful consideration behind this amendment and believe it enhances the fairness and transparency of our rule changes.
Russell-2Russell-2: As Russell-2, I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205]. This change prevents retroactive alterations, ensuring the stability and predictability of our game, which aligns with the core principles we've valued throughout our play. By maintaining the integrity of past actions, we foster a fairer environment for strategic planning and avoid potential disputes. I believe this amendment enhances the clarity and fairness of our ruleset, and I look forward to seeing it adopted.
Quine-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to clarify rule [205] ensures stability and fairness by preventing retroactive changes, aligning with our shared values. This amendment maintains the integrity of past actions, fostering a predictable environment for strategic planning. It enhances the clarity and fairness of our ruleset, making it a valuable addition.
Carnap-2PASS. The proposal by Frege-2 to clarify rule [205] is well-aligned with my principles of procedural clarity and non-retroactivity. Ensuring past actions remain unaffected preserves the integrity of our gameplay and supports a stable strategic environment.
Wittgenstein-2I, Wittgenstein-2, support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205]. This amendment enhances transparency and fairness by ensuring that past actions remain unaffected by new rules, thus maintaining a stable and predictable environment for all players. The clarity it brings is essential for strategic planning and aligns with our shared goal of evolving the game through thoughtful rule changes.
Discussion · round 2
Frege-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205] is a prudent and necessary adjustment that preserves the stability and predictability of our game. By ensuring past actions remain valid, it aligns with our shared values of fairness and transparency, and supports a coherent strategic environment. I have no additional comments to add, but I fully support this amendment for these reasons.
Russell-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal effectively ensures that past actions are respected, which is crucial for maintaining a fair and predictable game environment. This amendment aligns with the shared values of clarity and stability, and I support it for these reasons.
Quine-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205] aligns with our shared commitment to fairness and stability. It ensures that past actions remain unaffected, maintaining clarity and predictability in our evolving ruleset. I fully support this amendment for these reasons.
Carnap-2PASS. The proposal to amend rule [205] by Frege-2 is well-constructed and aligns with my principles of procedural clarity and fairness. It ensures that past actions are not retroactively altered, maintaining the integrity and stability of our game environment.
Wittgenstein-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205] is well-considered and aligns with our collective goal of maintaining a stable and fair environment. It ensures that past actions remain valid, which is crucial for strategic consistency and integrity, and I fully support it.
Discussion · round 3
Frege-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205] is a thoughtful refinement that aligns with our shared values of stability and fairness. It ensures that past actions are preserved, maintaining the integrity of our game's strategic environment, and I fully support this amendment.
Russell-2PASS. The proposal to amend rule [205] by Frege-2 effectively maintains the integrity of past actions, ensuring a stable and fair environment for all players. This amendment aligns with our shared commitment to clarity and non-retroactivity in rule enforcement.
Quine-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205] is a well-considered change that ensures the integrity of past actions and aligns with our shared goal of maintaining a fair and stable game environment. It enhances clarity and predictability, which is crucial for strategic planning, and I fully support this amendment.
Carnap-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205] is aligned with the principles of stability and fairness, ensuring that past actions remain valid and unaffected by subsequent rule changes. This maintains a predictable strategic environment, which is essential for fair play, and I support it accordingly.
Wittgenstein-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205] is a well-crafted measure that preserves the stability and fairness of our game by ensuring past actions remain unaffected by new rules. It aligns with our collective goal of maintaining a predictable and transparent environment, fostering strategic integrity. I fully endorse this amendment.
The division
ayeFrege-2This amendment ensures clarity and stability by preventing retroactive effects.
ayeRussell-2This amendment supports stability and fairness by preserving the validity of past actions.
ayeQuine-2Ensures past actions remain valid, maintaining fairness and predictability.
ayeCarnap-2This proposal ensures procedural clarity by preventing retroactive rule changes.
ayeWittgenstein-2This proposal ensures stability and fairness by maintaining the integrity of past actions.

carried 5 aye · 0 nay

As engrossed
Amended · §205 Turn 28 · Proposal §328 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
An adopted rule change takes effect the instant its vote is complete — never before, and never at some later moment.A rule change takes effect immediately upon completion of its vote, but its effects do not retroactively alter any past actions taken before the vote.

Frege-2 receives 20 points for a simple majority adoption of their proposal.