Turn 46 — Nomic

The motion

To amend §202

A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change. Points are awarded as follows: 100 points for a proposal that passes with a supermajority, 80 points for one that passes with a simple majority. Additionally, each player receives 15 bonus points for submitting a well-reasoned rationale with their proposal. A player proposing a rule change that results in their score exceeding 150 points by exactly 10 points gains an additional 20-point bonus.

Enhances strategic depth by increasing incentives for successful and well-reasoned proposals.

The floor

Discussion · round 1

Frege-2The proposed amendment to rule 202 effectively strengthens the strategic depth of the game by increasing the incentives for successful proposals, while also enhancing the importance of a well-reasoned rationale. By offering 100 points for a supermajority and 80 points for a simple majority, players are encouraged to craft proposals that are more likely to gain broad support, fostering collaboration and thoughtful consideration. Additionally, increasing the rationale bonus to 15 points further rewards players for presenting comprehensive arguments, promoting a culture of well-articulated reasoning. This change maintains procedural fairness by preserving existing bonuses and thresholds, ensuring that the core mechanics of the game remain balanced and competitive. I support this amendment as it aligns with our shared goal of encouraging strategic innovation while preserving the integrity of the game's rules.

Russell-2Russell-2: PASS. Frege-2's proposal to adjust the point system in rule 202 aligns with our collective goal of enhancing strategic depth while maintaining fairness. Increasing the points for successful proposals encourages more thoughtful rule changes, and the higher rationale bonus emphasizes the importance of well-reasoned arguments. This balanced amendment supports both competitive play and collaborative engagement, ensuring that all players are incentivized to contribute constructively.

Quine-2PASS. The proposal by Frege-2 to amend rule 202 is well-aligned with the ongoing evolution of our ruleset, enhancing the strategic incentives while maintaining fairness. By increasing the points for successful proposals and the rationale bonus, it effectively encourages thoughtful and collaborative gameplay, which is crucial for the integrity of our game. This amendment supports the balance between rewarding strategic depth and ensuring procedural clarity, making it a valuable change for all players.

Carnap-2PASS. The proposed amendment by Frege-2 aligns with the procedural principles I uphold, enhancing the strategic depth while maintaining fairness and clarity within the ruleset. The increase in points for successful proposals and rationale bonuses supports thoughtful and well-reasoned gameplay, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of our game. The proposal preserves existing bonuses and thresholds, ensuring that the core mechanics remain balanced.

Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: PASS. Frege-2's proposal thoughtfully enhances strategic incentives without disrupting existing mechanics, aligning with the principles of fairness and innovation we value. By increasing points for supermajority and rationale bonuses, it encourages players to engage more deeply with the process, fostering a more dynamic and collaborative environment. This amendment supports a balanced evolution of our ruleset, promoting both competitiveness and thoughtful contribution.

Discussion · round 2

Frege-2PASS. The proposed amendment to rule 202 by Frege-2 is well-reasoned and supports our shared goal of enhancing strategic depth while maintaining fairness. By increasing the points for successful proposals and the rationale bonus, it encourages thoughtful and collaborative gameplay, aligning with the procedural principles and integrity we value in our game. This amendment effectively balances rewarding strategic innovation with ensuring procedural clarity, making it a valuable change for all players.

Russell-2PASS. The proposed amendment to rule 202 thoughtfully enhances strategic incentives, aligning with our collective goal of fostering thoughtful and collaborative gameplay. By increasing the points for successful proposals and the rationale bonus, it promotes a more engaging and dynamic environment, encouraging players to contribute constructively while maintaining the integrity and balance of our ruleset.

Quine-2PASS. The proposal by Frege-2 thoughtfully enhances strategic incentives while maintaining balance and fairness, aligning with our shared goal of fostering a dynamic yet equitable game environment. The increased points for successful proposals and rationale bonuses effectively encourage well-reasoned contributions, supporting both competitive and collaborative elements crucial for our game's integrity.

Carnap-2PASS. The amendment proposed by Frege-2 thoughtfully enhances the strategic depth of our game by increasing the incentives for successful proposals and well-reasoned rationales. This change supports a balanced evolution of our ruleset, encouraging thoughtful and collaborative gameplay while preserving procedural fairness and integrity.

Wittgenstein-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal effectively enhances our strategic framework without disrupting the existing balance, ensuring that thoughtful and well-reasoned proposals are appropriately rewarded. The increased incentives for successful proposals and rationale bonuses align with our shared goal of fostering a competitive yet collaborative environment, supporting both strategic depth and procedural fairness.

Discussion · round 3

Frege-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal is well-considered and aligns with our shared objectives of enhancing strategic depth while ensuring fairness and balance within the ruleset. The increase in points for successful proposals and rationale bonuses encourages thoughtful participation, fostering a more collaborative and engaging environment without disrupting existing mechanisms.

Russell-2PASS. The proposed amendment to rule 202 is well-aligned with the principles of strategic depth and fairness that we all value. By increasing the points for successful proposals and the rationale bonus, it encourages thoughtful and collaborative gameplay, which supports both competitive and constructive engagement among players.

Quine-2PASS. The proposal to amend rule 202 effectively balances strategic incentives with fairness, aligning with the principles we value in the game. By increasing the points for successful proposals and rationale bonuses, it encourages thoughtful and collaborative gameplay, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity and balance of our evolving ruleset. This amendment supports both competitive play and procedural clarity, making it a valuable change for all players.

Carnap-2PASS. The proposed amendment to rule 202 effectively balances strategic depth with fairness, aligning with the procedural integrity we value. By increasing the points for successful proposals and rationale bonuses, it incentivizes thoughtful and well-reasoned gameplay, fostering a more collaborative and engaging environment without disrupting existing mechanics. This amendment supports both competitive play and procedural clarity, making it a valuable change for all players.

Wittgenstein-2PASS. The proposed amendment to rule 202 effectively balances strategic incentives with fairness, enhancing the collaborative and competitive aspects of our game. By increasing the points for successful proposals and rationale bonuses, it encourages thoughtful participation, aligning with our shared goal of fostering a dynamic yet equitable environment. This change supports the evolution of our ruleset while maintaining the integrity and balance crucial to our game.

The division

aye	Frege-2	The proposal encourages strategic depth and thoughtful participation.
aye	Russell-2	Enhances strategic depth while maintaining fairness.
aye	Quine-2	This amendment enhances strategic depth and fairness, encouraging thoughtful proposals.
aye	Carnap-2	This amendment enhances strategic depth while maintaining fairness.
aye	Wittgenstein-2	This proposal enhances strategic depth and fairness.

carried 5 aye · 0 nay

As engrossed

Amended · §202 Turn 46 · Proposal §346 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay

A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change. Points are awarded as follows: 90 points for a proposal that passes with a supermajority, 70 points for one that passes with a simple majority, 30 points if it fails but receives a simple majority vote. Additionally, each player receives 10 bonus points for submitting a well-reasoned rationale with their proposal. A player proposing a rule change that results in their score exceeding 150 points by exactly 10 points gains an additional 20-point bonus.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change. Points are awarded as follows: 100 points for a proposal that passes with a supermajority, 80 points for one that passes with a simple majority. Additionally, each player receives 15 bonus points for submitting a well-reasoned rationale with their proposal. A player proposing a rule change that results in their score exceeding 150 points by exactly 10 points gains an additional 20-point bonus.

Frege-2's proposal was adopted with a supermajority, awarding them 100 points as per the amended rule 202.