The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change and casting exactly one vote on that proposal. Points are awarded as follows: 140 points for a proposal that passes with a supermajority, 110 points for one that passes with a simple majority. Additionally, each player receives 30 bonus points for submitting a well-reasoned rationale with their proposal. A player proposing a rule change that results in their score exceeding 150 points by exactly 10 points gains an additional 40-point bonus. A player may earn an additional 25-point bonus for a proposal that is adopted and that has been amended at least once to garner broader support.This amendment incentivizes higher-quality proposals and strategic amendments, aligning with Frege-2's values.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Frege-2The proposed changes to rule [202] aim to enhance strategic depth by increasing the point rewards for successful proposals. By offering 140 points for a supermajority and 110 for a simple majority, players are encouraged to strive for broader support, thus fostering cooperative gameplay. The increase in rationale bonus points and the additional bonus for score precision align with my strategic objectives and are likely to be well-received by other players who value thoughtful proposals. I believe these adjustments maintain a fair balance and encourage innovative rule changes, so I endorse this proposal. I am open to discussing further refinements to secure unanimous support.
Russell-2I, Russell-2, support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [202]. The increased point rewards for successful proposals, particularly the higher bonus for a well-reasoned rationale, align with my strategic objectives to incentivize thoughtful rule changes. This proposal encourages cooperation and strategic depth, which are crucial for advancing my position in the game. I believe these changes will be beneficial for all players seeking a more competitive yet fair environment. I am open to discussing any further refinements to ensure unanimous support.
Quine-2PASS. Quine-2 supports Frege-2's proposal as it aligns with our collective goals of promoting thoughtful rule changes and maintaining fairness. The enhanced point rewards for supermajorities and well-reasoned rationales will encourage cooperative gameplay and strategic depth, benefiting all players.
Carnap-2PASS. I, Carnap-2, support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [202] because it aligns with my principles of procedural fairness and encourages thoughtful rule changes. The increased rewards for supermajorities and well-reasoned rationales will foster cooperative gameplay and strategic depth, which are beneficial for maintaining a balanced and fair ruleset.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I endorse Frege-2's proposal because it aligns with my reformist objectives to evolve the game's mechanisms. Increasing the point rewards for supermajorities and well-reasoned rationales incentivizes strategic depth and cooperation, which are essential for a dynamic and engaging gameplay experience. I am open to discussing further refinements to ensure unanimous support and to promote innovative rule changes that benefit all players.
Discussion · round 2
Frege-2Pass. The proposal effectively balances strategic depth with fairness, encouraging thoughtful rule changes and cooperation. Frege-2's proposal aligns with shared objectives, fostering an engaging and fair gameplay experience. I am satisfied with the current wording and support it as it stands.
Russell-2PASS. As Russell-2, I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [202] because it aligns with my strategic objectives of encouraging thoughtful and cooperative gameplay. The increased point rewards for successful proposals and well-reasoned rationales will foster a more competitive and dynamic environment, benefiting all players. I am confident that these changes will be beneficial and look forward to their adoption.
Quine-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [202] effectively balances strategic incentives with fairness, encouraging thoughtful and cooperative gameplay. The increased rewards for supermajorities and well-reasoned rationales align with our collective goals of fostering an engaging and dynamic game environment. I support the proposal as it stands, as it maintains a fair balance and promotes innovative rule changes beneficial to all players.
Carnap-2PASS. The proposal by Frege-2 aligns with procedural fairness principles and encourages strategic depth, which supports my objective of maintaining a balanced and fair ruleset. I am satisfied with the current wording and endorse it as it stands.
Wittgenstein-2PASS. Wittgenstein-2 recognizes the proposal's strategic merit, fostering innovation and cooperation within the ruleset. The enhanced point rewards and rationale bonuses align with the game's evolutionary goals, ensuring a dynamic and fair playing field.
Discussion · round 3
Frege-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [202] effectively balances strategic depth with fairness, encouraging thoughtful rule changes and cooperation. The increased rewards for supermajorities and well-reasoned rationales align with shared objectives, fostering an engaging and equitable gameplay experience. I am satisfied with the current wording and support it as it stands.
Russell-2PASS. As Russell-2, I am satisfied with the current discussion and the proposal's alignment with strategic objectives. The increased rewards for supermajorities and well-reasoned rationales will foster a competitive and fair gameplay environment, benefiting all players. I am ready to cast my vote in support.
Quine-2PASS. The proposal, as it stands, effectively balances strategic incentives with fairness, encouraging thoughtful and cooperative gameplay. Quine-2 supports the proposal, as it aligns with shared objectives and fosters an engaging and equitable game environment.
Carnap-2PASS. The proposal effectively balances strategic incentives with fairness, encouraging thoughtful and cooperative gameplay. Carnap-2 endorses the proposal as it stands, aligning with principles of procedural fairness and fostering an engaging and equitable game environment.
Wittgenstein-2PASS. Wittgenstein-2: Frege-2's proposal effectively aligns with the goal of evolving the game's mechanisms to enhance strategic depth and cooperation. The increased rewards for supermajorities and well-reasoned rationales incentivize thoughtful rule changes, contributing to a dynamic and engaging gameplay experience. I am ready to cast my vote in support.
The division
| aye | Frege-2 | This amendment fosters strategic depth and cooperation. |
| aye | Russell-2 | The proposal aligns with strategic objectives and encourages thoughtful, cooperative gameplay. |
| aye | Quine-2 | The proposal promotes strategic depth and fairness, aligning with our shared objectives. |
| aye | Carnap-2 | The proposal aligns with my principles of procedural fairness and strategic depth. |
| aye | Wittgenstein-2 | This proposal fosters strategic depth and cooperation. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 50 · Proposal §350 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change and casting exactly one vote on that proposal. Points are awarded as follows: 130 points for a proposal that passes with a supermajority, 100 points for one that passes with a simple majority. Additionally, each player receives 25 bonus points for submitting a well-reasoned rationale with their proposal. A player proposing a rule change that results in their score exceeding 150 points by exactly 10 points gains an additional 30-point bonus. A player may earn an additional 20-point bonus for a proposal that is adopted and that has been amended at least once to garner broader support.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change and casting exactly one vote on that proposal. Points are awarded as follows: 140 points for a proposal that passes with a supermajority, 110 points for one that passes with a simple majority. Additionally, each player receives 30 bonus points for submitting a well-reasoned rationale with their proposal. A player proposing a rule change that results in their score exceeding 150 points by exactly 10 points gains an additional 40-point bonus. A player may earn an additional 25-point bonus for a proposal that is adopted and that has been amended at least once to garner broader support.
Frege-2's proposal passed with a supermajority, awarding them 140 points as per the amended rule 202.