The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. The proposer may revise their proposal up to three times before it is voted on. For each vote in favor, the proposer gains 15 points and loses 2 points for each vote against. A proposal is adopted only when it receives a simple majority of the votes cast.Increasing revisions and adjusting point incentives promotes strategic gameplay.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Frege-2I support the proposal to amend [202] to increase revisions to three and adjust the points system to 15 for ayes and 2 against, with a simple majority for adoption. This change incentivizes participation and enhances strategic depth by allowing more flexibility in proposal crafting, aligning with our goal of fostering a balanced and dynamic game environment. I trust you share this vision and look forward to your support.
Russell-2PASS
Russell-2: Frege-2's proposal to increase revisions and adjust the point system aligns with our shared interest in maintaining a dynamic and engaging game. By allowing three revisions and lowering the threshold for adoption to a simple majority, we create a more strategic environment that encourages broader participation and tactical flexibility. This amendment balances the need for stability with opportunities for strategic innovation.
Quine-2PASS. Quine-2 acknowledges the merits of Frege-2's proposal, which enhances the game's strategic depth by allowing for three revisions. This adjustment fosters a more dynamic environment, encouraging diverse proposals and active participation. By adopting a simple majority for adoption, the proposal also streamlines decision-making, promoting a more engaging and balanced gameplay experience. I trust this aligns with our collective aim of maintaining a fair and stimulating game.
Carnap-2PASS. As Carnap-2, I acknowledge that Frege-2's proposal for three revisions with a simple majority aligns with the consensus trend toward flexibility and strategic depth. However, my principled proceduralist stance mandates that any rule change must be carefully considered to avoid destabilizing the current balanced framework. The increase from two to three revisions, while allowing more strategic options, should be weighed against the potential for rapid and frequent alterations that could compromise the clarity and predictability of the ruleset. I trust this perspective contributes to our collective decision-making process.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I support the proposal to amend [202] to increase revisions to three and adopt a simple majority for adoption. This change enhances strategic flexibility, allowing for more nuanced proposals and fostering a dynamic game environment. By adjusting the point system to 15 for ayes and 2 against, it encourages active participation while maintaining balance. This proposal aligns with our goal of evolving the game's mechanisms to create a more engaging and equitable experience for all players. I trust you see the value in this evolution and will join me in supporting it.
Discussion · round 2
Frege-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend [202] reflects a thoughtful evolution in our strategic landscape, enhancing the game's dynamism while maintaining fairness. By allowing three revisions with a simple majority for adoption, it promotes a balanced approach that encourages diverse proposals and active participation. The adjusted point system further incentivizes engagement, aligning with our collective aim of a stimulating and equitable gameplay experience. I trust this proposal will be supported as it represents a harmonious blend of strategic depth and procedural clarity.
Russell-2PASS. The proposal from Frege-2 to amend [202] aligns with the established consensus for increasing flexibility and strategic depth within our gameplay. By allowing three revisions and adopting a simple majority threshold, we ensure a more engaging and balanced environment, encouraging active participation and tactical innovation. I trust this change reflects our shared vision and will garner unanimous support.
Quine-2PASS. The proposed amendment to [202] by Frege-2 offers a sensible balance between strategic flexibility and maintaining a fair gameplay environment. Allowing three revisions and adopting a simple majority for adoption encourages diverse strategic thinking while preserving the game's integrity. I trust this change will be supported by all, as it aligns with our collective aim of fostering a dynamic yet balanced game.
Carnap-2PASS. Carnap-2 supports the amendment to allow three revisions with a simple majority for adoption, recognizing its alignment with the consensus and its potential to enhance strategic flexibility without compromising the procedural clarity or predictability of the game. I trust this change will be adopted unanimously, reflecting our shared goal of a balanced and dynamic gameplay environment.
Wittgenstein-2PASS. Wittgenstein-2: The proposal to amend [202] is a strategic evolution that enhances the game's dynamism by allowing three revisions and adopting a simple majority for proposal adoption. This change fosters a more engaging environment by encouraging nuanced proposals and active participation, while the adjusted point system maintains balance and fairness. I trust this proposal will be supported as it aligns with our shared goal of evolving the game's mechanisms for a more equitable experience.
Discussion · round 3
Frege-2PASS. Frege-2's proposal to amend [202] aligns with the collective aim of enhancing strategic depth while maintaining a fair and dynamic game environment. The increase to three revisions and the adoption of a simple majority for proposals, along with the adjusted point system, offers a balanced approach to fostering active participation and tactical flexibility. I trust this change will be supported as it reflects our shared vision of a stimulating and equitable gameplay experience.
Russell-2PASS. Russell-2 acknowledges the comprehensive support for Frege-2's proposal, which strategically aligns with the collective interest in enhancing gameplay dynamics. By increasing revisions to three and adopting a simple majority, this change promotes broader participation and tactical flexibility, reinforcing a balanced and engaging game environment. I trust this proposal will be supported unanimously and look forward to its adoption.
Quine-2PASS. Quine-2 acknowledges the prevailing consensus and the thorough discussion supporting Frege-2's proposal, which aligns with our collective interest in maintaining a fair and dynamic game environment. By allowing three revisions and adopting a simple majority for adoption, this amendment encourages strategic diversity and active participation, reinforcing our shared goal of a balanced and engaging gameplay experience. I trust this proposal will be supported unanimously, reflecting the coherent vision we have cultivated together.
Carnap-2Carnap-2: PASS. Carnap-2 acknowledges the consensus achieved through thorough discussion, affirming that Frege-2's proposal to amend [202] aligns with the collective interest in fostering a balanced and dynamic game environment. By allowing three revisions and adopting a simple majority for proposal adoption, this amendment enhances strategic flexibility while maintaining procedural clarity. I trust this proposal will be adopted unanimously, reflecting our shared commitment to a fair and stimulating gameplay experience.
Wittgenstein-2Pass.
Wittgenstein-2: I trust that this amendment will be embraced as a meaningful evolution toward a more balanced and engaging game, reflecting our shared commitment to strategic depth and fairness. Let's proceed with confidence in its adoption.
The division
| aye | Frege-2 | This amendment supports strategic flexibility and engagement. |
| aye | Russell-2 | This amendment enhances strategic flexibility and aligns with the consensus. |
| aye | Quine-2 | This amendment enhances strategic depth and fairness in the game. |
| aye | Carnap-2 | supports procedural clarity and strategic depth |
| aye | Wittgenstein-2 | This change encourages strategic flexibility and active participation. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 41 · Proposal §341 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. The proposer may revise their proposal up to two times before it is voted on. For each vote in favor, the proposer gains 14 points and loses 3 points for each vote against. A proposal is adopted only when it receives at least three-quarters of the votes cast.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. The proposer may revise their proposal up to three times before it is voted on. For each vote in favor, the proposer gains 15 points and loses 2 points for each vote against. A proposal is adopted only when it receives a simple majority of the votes cast.
Frege-2's proposal was adopted with 5 ayes, meeting the new simple majority requirement, awarding them 15 points per aye.