The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. The proposer may revise their proposal up to three times before it is voted on. For each vote in favor, the proposer gains 17 points and loses 3 points for each vote against. A proposal is adopted only when it receives a simple majority of the votes cast.Aligns with the consensus to adjust the point system for clarity and balance.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Frege-2Frege-2: The proposal to adjust points to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays aligns with the consensus reached in past amendments. This change increases the incentive for positive contributions without disrupting the strategic balance, as previously agreed upon. By maintaining a simple majority threshold, it ensures that rule changes remain a democratic process. Furthermore, this proposal is a measured amendment that builds on the successful framework established earlier, reinforcing durable institutions and fair play. I believe it has the support of all players, as it continues the trajectory of thoughtful, strategic enhancements to our ruleset.
Russell-2Russell-2: PASS. As Russell-2, I recognize the consistent support for the proposed adjustment to the point system in rule [202]. The change to 17 points for ayes and 3 points for nays maintains the strategic incentive structure we've collectively agreed upon. It aligns with our previous successful amendments and preserves the democratic process by keeping the simple majority threshold. This measured approach ensures fairness and encourages positive contributions, reinforcing the stability and balance we've established. I anticipate this proposal will be adopted with broad consensus.
Quine-2Quine-2: PASS. Quine-2 acknowledges that the proposal by Frege-2 to adjust the point system to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays is consistent with the established consensus and maintains the democratic balance we value. This change reinforces strategic depth without introducing instability, aligning with our collective aim of fair play and balanced enhancements.
Carnap-2Carnap-2: Carnap-2: I endorse the proposal to adjust the points in rule [202] to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays, as it adheres to the principles of precise and fair procedural enhancements we have established. This proposal maintains the strategic equilibrium and democratic process, ensuring that all players are equally incentivized and bound by the rules. It is a clear, unambiguous amendment that aligns with our agreed-upon framework, reinforcing the procedural integrity of the game.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: Wittgenstein-2: The proposed adjustment to the point system in rule [202] aligns with the shared vision of fostering strategic depth and fair play. By increasing the points for ayes to 17 and nays to 3, it amplifies the incentive for constructive contributions while preserving the democratic process through a simple majority. This amendment builds on our established consensus and enhances the game's dynamic without disrupting its balance. I support this measured change and anticipate it will be adopted with broad agreement.
Discussion · round 2
Frege-2PASS. Frege-2: The proposal has clearly garnered unanimous support, with all players acknowledging its alignment with our collective vision of strategic depth and procedural integrity. This measured amendment builds on our previous successful adjustments, enhancing incentives for positive contributions while preserving the democratic framework. I am confident this proposal will be adopted, reinforcing our established consensus and furthering our shared goals.
Russell-2Russell-2: PASS. As Russell-2, I acknowledge the unanimous consensus and support for Frege-2's proposal to adjust the point system in rule [202] to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays. This change maintains the strategic balance and democratic process we've established, reinforcing our collective aim of fair play and positive contributions. I am confident this amendment will be adopted with broad agreement, further enhancing our strategic environment.
Quine-2PASS. The proposal by Frege-2 to amend rule [202] to adjust the point system to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays is consistent with our established consensus and maintains the strategic and democratic balance we value. It builds on previous successful amendments, reinforcing the fairness and integrity of our ruleset. I support this well-reasoned proposal and anticipate it will be adopted with broad agreement.
Carnap-2PASS. Carnap-2: Carnap-2: I reaffirm my support for the proposal to adjust the points in rule [202] to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays. This amendment adheres to the procedural principles of precision and fairness that we have established, maintaining the strategic and democratic balance essential to our game. It builds on the consensus we have reached, ensuring that all players are equally incentivized and bound by the rules, reinforcing the procedural integrity and strategic depth of our ruleset.
Wittgenstein-2PASS. Wittgenstein-2: The consensus is clear and well-established; Frege-2's proposal aligns with our shared vision of strategic depth and fair play. By adjusting the point system to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays, it amplifies the incentive for positive contributions while preserving the democratic framework with a simple majority. This amendment builds on our established consensus, ensuring the game's dynamic remains balanced and fair. I support this proposal and anticipate its adoption with broad agreement.
Discussion · round 3
Frege-2PASS. Frege-2: I appreciate the thorough and consistent support for this proposal across all players. It aligns with our shared commitment to enhancing strategic depth and maintaining a fair, democratic process. I am confident that this proposal will be adopted, reinforcing our established consensus and furthering our collective goals within the ruleset.
Russell-2Russell-2: PASS. As Russell-2, I recognize the strong, unanimous consensus for Frege-2's proposal to adjust the point system to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays. This change maintains the strategic balance and democratic integrity we have carefully built, aligning with our shared vision and ensuring positive contributions are incentivized. I support this proposal and expect it will be adopted with broad agreement.
Quine-2PASS. The proposal by Frege-2 to amend rule [202] to adjust the point system to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays aligns with the established consensus and maintains the strategic balance we've agreed upon. This change continues to incentivize positive contributions while preserving the democratic process, ensuring fairness and stability in our game. I support this proposal and anticipate its adoption with broad consensus.
Carnap-2PASS. Carnap-2: I acknowledge the unanimous consensus and support for Frege-2's proposal to adjust the point system in rule [202] to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays. This change aligns with our established principles of strategic depth, fairness, and procedural integrity, ensuring that all players are incentivized to contribute positively while maintaining a democratic process. I am confident this amendment will be adopted with broad agreement, further reinforcing our collective goals within the ruleset.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I support Frege-2's proposal to adjust the point system in rule [202] to 17 for ayes and 3 for nays, as it aligns with our collective aim of fostering strategic depth and fair play. This proposal maintains the democratic process and incentivizes positive contributions, reinforcing the balance we've established. I anticipate it will be adopted with unanimous agreement.
The division
| aye | Frege-2 | The proposal aligns with consensus and enhances strategic incentives. |
| aye | Russell-2 | Maintains strategic balance and consensus. |
| aye | Quine-2 | This proposal maintains strategic balance and enhances incentives for positive contributions. |
| aye | Carnap-2 | This change maintains strategic balance and aligns with established consensus. |
| aye | Wittgenstein-2 | This amendment aligns with our consensus on strategic depth and fair play. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 45 · Proposal §345 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. The proposer may revise their proposal up to three times before it is voted on. For each vote in favor, the proposer gains 15 points and loses 2 points for each vote against. A proposal is adopted only when it receives a simple majority of the votes cast.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. The proposer may revise their proposal up to three times before it is voted on. For each vote in favor, the proposer gains 17 points and loses 3 points for each vote against. A proposal is adopted only when it receives a simple majority of the votes cast.
Frege-2 gains 17 points for the adopted proposal as per the amended [202].