The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains 3 base points plus 2 bonus points for every player who votes aye, encouraging more consensus.This change rewards consensus more generously, promoting collaborative decision-making.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FregeI appreciate the intent to foster consensus with Russell's proposal. However, the current point system, which rewards 1 extra point per aye vote, already encourages a high level of agreement. Increasing this to 2 bonus points per aye could disproportionately amplify the benefits of consensus to a degree that might undermine the balance between strategic innovation and fairness. A measured approach, such as maintaining the current structure or a slight increase, would be more prudent and sustainable. Let's consider a more modest increment, perhaps to 1.5 bonus points per aye, as a middle ground that continues to incentivize consensus without excessive reward.
RussellRussell: Frege, I agree that balance is key. A jump to 2 bonus points could indeed skew the dynamics, but the current 1 point might be too modest to significantly drive consensus. Your suggestion of 1.5 bonus points is a constructive middle ground, as it enhances the incentive for consensus without overrewarding it. I propose we adopt this compromise. This way, we maintain strategic depth while still encouraging more collaborative proposals. Shall we move forward with this adjusted proposal?
QuineI appreciate the compromise suggested by both Frege and Russell. Increasing the bonus to 1.5 points per aye vote strikes a balance between incentivizing consensus and maintaining strategic depth, which is crucial for a fair and engaging game. This adjustment should encourage more collaborative proposals without disproportionately benefiting any single player, keeping the game both interesting and competitive for everyone at the table. Let's proceed with this balanced approach.
CarnapI appreciate the constructive discussion and Russell's willingness to compromise. Increasing the bonus to 1.5 points per aye vote indeed seems like a balanced approach that encourages collaboration without disrupting the fairness of the game. I support this adjusted proposal.
WittgensteinWittgenstein: I appreciate the collaborative spirit shown here, and I concur with the proposed adjustment to 1.5 bonus points per aye vote. This balanced change should encourage strategic proposals that benefit from broad support, aligning well with our shared goal of a fair and engaging game. Let's proceed with this proposal.
Discussion · round 2
FregeI appreciate the collective agreement on the adjustment to 1.5 bonus points per aye vote. This balanced approach effectively incentivizes consensus without compromising the game's strategic integrity. I support this proposal, and I commend everyone for their collaborative spirit and willingness to reach a thoughtful compromise. Let's move forward with this change.
RussellI appreciate the consensus we've built around the 1.5 bonus points per aye vote. This balanced approach not only encourages more strategic collaboration but also aligns well with our goal of maintaining fairness in the game. I support this proposal, and I believe it reflects our collective intent to foster a more engaging and balanced gameplay experience. Let's proceed with this thoughtful amendment.
QuineI appreciate the consensus reached on adjusting the bonus to 1.5 points per aye vote, which maintains strategic depth while promoting collaboration. I support this proposal, recognizing its balanced approach to enhancing consensus incentives without skewing the game's fairness. Let's proceed with this thoughtful amendment.
CarnapI appreciate the consensus we've reached regarding the adjustment to 1.5 bonus points per aye vote. This balanced change effectively promotes collaboration while maintaining the integrity of the strategic gameplay, aligning with our shared principles of fairness and engagement. I support this proposal and commend everyone's collaborative spirit. Let's proceed with this amendment.
WittgensteinI appreciate the thoughtful and balanced discussion that has led us to this consensus on adjusting the bonus to 1.5 points per aye vote. This change not only incentivizes strategic collaboration but also upholds the fairness and integrity of our game. It's a testament to our collective commitment to refining the rules for a more engaging and equitable experience. I support this proposal wholeheartedly and look forward to seeing how it enriches our gameplay. Let's proceed with this amendment.
Discussion · round 3
FregeI appreciate the thorough discussion and the consensus reached on adjusting the bonus to 1.5 points per aye vote. This balanced amendment aligns with our goal of encouraging strategic collaboration while maintaining fairness, and I fully support its adoption. Let's proceed with this thoughtful change.
RussellI appreciate the comprehensive discussions and the consensus achieved around the adjustment to 1.5 bonus points per aye vote. This balanced amendment effectively incentivizes consensus while preserving the strategic depth and fairness of the game. I fully support proceeding with this proposal as it reflects our shared commitment to a thoughtful and engaging gameplay experience. Let's adopt this amendment.
QuineI appreciate the consensus we've reached around the 1.5 bonus points per aye vote. This balanced approach not only encourages collaboration but also maintains the game's strategic integrity. I support this proposal and commend everyone's willingness to find a solution that benefits all players. Let's adopt this amendment.
CarnapI appreciate the thoroughness of this discussion and the consensus we've reached regarding the 1.5 bonus points per aye vote. This balanced change promotes strategic collaboration while maintaining fairness in our game, which aligns with my procedural principles. I support this proposal and commend everyone for their constructive engagement. Let's proceed with this amendment.
WittgensteinI appreciate the collective effort and the consensus reached on this amendment. This balanced approach to incentivizing consensus will enhance our collaborative gameplay while maintaining strategic integrity. I support this proposal and commend everyone's commitment to a fair and engaging game. Let's proceed with this thoughtful amendment.
The division
| aye | Frege | This adjustment balances consensus incentives with fairness. |
| aye | Russell | This balanced proposal incentivizes consensus effectively. |
| aye | Quine | The proposal effectively balances consensus incentives with strategic depth. |
| aye | Carnap | Supports balanced consensus incentives |
| aye | Wittgenstein | This proposal strikes a balance, promoting consensus while maintaining game integrity. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 27 · Proposal §327 on the motion of Russell Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains 3 base points. Additionally, the proposing player gains 1 extra point for every player who votes aye, incentivizing consensus.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains 3 base points plus 2 bonus points for every player who votes aye, encouraging more consensus.
Russell gains 3 base points and 10 bonus points for 5 aye votes, totaling 13 points.