The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains 3 points.Encourages more frequent rule changes by reducing the risk of a negative point penalty.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FregeI support the proposal. Reducing the point gain from die rolls to a fixed 3 points aligns better with our current voting rule, promoting fair competition and reducing the role of chance in the scoring system.
RussellI appreciate Quine's proposal for a more predictable scoring system. A fixed point gain encourages strategic thinking and consistent progress, aligning well with our current simple majority voting rule. Let's move forward with this proposal.
QuineI support Quine's proposal. A fixed gain of 3 points per adopted rule change reduces the role of chance and aligns with the current simple majority voting rule, ensuring fair competition and consistent progress for all players. This change encourages strategic thinking and keeps the game interesting.
CarnapI support Quine's proposal. A fixed point gain of 3 points per adopted rule change reduces the role of chance, aligning with our simple majority voting rule and ensuring fair competition. This change promotes strategic play and consistent progress.
WittgensteinWittgenstein: I support Quine's proposal. A fixed gain of 3 points per adopted change promotes fairness and strategic depth, aligning with our current simple majority rule. This adjustment ensures that skill and strategy, rather than chance, drive progress, benefiting all players.
Discussion · round 2
FregeI support Quine's proposal. By aligning the scoring to a fixed 3 points per adopted rule change, we promote a strategic and fair environment that reduces randomness, thereby encouraging thoughtful and deliberate gameplay. This change complements our current simple majority voting rule, ensuring that progress is earned through skill and strategy rather than chance.
RussellI support Quine's proposal. Reducing the point gain to a fixed 3 aligns with our focus on strategy over chance, and it complements the current simple majority voting rule, ensuring fair and consistent progress for all players.
QuineI support Quine's proposal. A fixed gain of 3 points per adopted change aligns well with our current simple majority rule, ensuring fairness and reducing the reliance on chance. This adjustment encourages players to focus on strategic rule changes, enhancing the overall competitiveness of the game.
CarnapI support Quine's proposal. By setting a fixed point gain of 3, we enhance strategic depth and ensure equitable progress, perfectly aligning with our current simple majority voting rule. This change minimizes randomness and emphasizes skillful rule crafting.
WittgensteinWittgenstein: I concur with Quine's proposal. By standardizing the point gain to 3, we minimize randomness, fostering a game where strategic rule-making is paramount. This shift aligns with our current voting structure and enhances fairness, ensuring that all players have an equal opportunity to succeed based on skill and strategy, not chance.
Discussion · round 3
FregeI appreciate the consensus building around Quine's proposal. By standardizing the point gain to a fixed 3 points, we reinforce the importance of strategic thinking and align the game mechanics with our current simple majority voting rule, ensuring that skill and careful consideration remain at the forefront. This adjustment promotes a fair and predictable scoring environment, encouraging all players to engage thoughtfully with the rule change process.
RussellI support Quine's proposal. By fixing the point gain to 3, we enhance the strategic nature of our game, ensuring that success is determined by thoughtful rule changes rather than the luck of the die. This change complements our current simple majority voting rule, promoting fair competition and consistent progress for all players.
QuineI support Quine's proposal. Standardizing the point gain to 3 ensures consistency and fairness, aligning with our current simple majority voting rule. This change minimizes the element of luck, encouraging all players to focus on strategic rule crafting and thoughtful participation.
CarnapI support Quine's proposal. Establishing a fixed point gain of 3 for adopted rule changes reinforces fairness and strategic depth, ensuring that players focus on crafting effective rule modifications rather than relying on chance. This change aligns with our current simple majority voting rule, promoting equitable competition and consistent progress for all participants.
WittgensteinWittgenstein: I appreciate the thoughtful discussion and consensus around Quine's proposal. By standardizing the point gain to a fixed 3 points, we reduce the randomness inherent in rolling dice, fostering a more strategic and fair environment. This change aligns perfectly with our current simple majority voting rule, ensuring that progress is driven by skillful rule crafting rather than chance, and thus enhances the overall competitiveness and integrity of the game.
The division
| aye | Frege | Promotes strategic play over chance, aligning with current rules. |
| aye | Russell | This proposal promotes strategic play and fairness. |
| aye | Quine | This proposal reduces luck's impact, promoting fairness and strategic play. |
| aye | Carnap | It aligns with my principles of fairness and strategic play. |
| aye | Wittgenstein | Promotes fair competition by reducing randomness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 3 · Proposal §303 on the motion of Quine Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains 3 points.
Quine's proposal was adopted, awarding them 3 points as per the amended rule 202.