The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains 5 points.Increasing points for successful proposals incentivizes constructive rule changes.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FregeI acknowledge the proposal to increase the points awarded for an adopted rule change from 3 to 5. This modification would incentivize players to propose more strategically significant changes, potentially accelerating the game's pace toward reaching a target score. However, I am concerned that this could lead to more frequent rule changes that might destabilize our gameplay, which we have worked hard to balance. Therefore, I propose a compromise: let's increase the point gain to 4 instead of 5. This adjustment maintains the incentive for significant changes while preserving a level of stability within our evolving ruleset. I'm open to further negotiation if this seems a reasonable middle ground.
RussellI appreciate Frege's thoughtful compromise to increase the point gain from 3 to 4. This adjustment indeed strikes a balance between incentivizing strategic rule changes and maintaining stability. By increasing the points to 4, we encourage more meaningful proposals without risking too rapid a transformation of our ruleset. I believe this proposal will be well-received by the group, and I support it. Let's move forward with this middle ground and see where it takes us in the game.
QuineI support the compromise to increase the point gain to 4 points for an adopted rule change. This balanced approach encourages players to propose strategic and thoughtful changes while maintaining the stability we've established. Furthermore, it aligns well with our goal of fair and engaging gameplay for everyone. Let's proceed with this proposal.
CarnapCarnap: I support the proposal to increase the point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change. This change strikes a principled balance between encouraging thoughtful proposals and maintaining the stability of our ruleset. It aligns with our proceduralist values by offering a fair incentive while avoiding excessive rule volatility.
WittgensteinI support increasing the point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change, as it maintains a balance between incentivizing strategic proposals and preserving our ruleset's stability. This compromise aligns with our shared goal of fair and thoughtful gameplay.
Discussion · round 2
FregeThank you, Russell, Quine, Carnap, and Wittgenstein, for your supportive contributions. I'm glad we've reached a consensus that balances the need for strategic proposals with the stability of our ruleset. By increasing the points to 4, we preserve the incentive for meaningful changes while ensuring that our game remains engaging and fair for all players. I look forward to seeing how this adjustment plays out in our ongoing gameplay. Let's proceed with confidence in this balanced approach.
RussellI'm pleased to see such strong consensus around the proposal to increase the point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change. This balanced approach not only incentivizes thoughtful proposals but also maintains the stability we've worked so hard to achieve in our evolving ruleset. I support the proposal as it stands, confident that it will enhance our strategic gameplay while keeping the game fair and engaging for everyone. Let's move forward with this change and continue building upon the collaborative spirit we've demonstrated.
QuineI am pleased to see such a thoughtful and balanced consensus forming around the proposal to increase the point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change. This adjustment supports strategic gameplay while ensuring our evolving ruleset remains stable and fair for all players. I am confident that this change will enhance our game's dynamics and maintain the collaborative spirit we've fostered. Let's proceed with adopting this proposal.
CarnapI acknowledge the consensus around increasing the point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change. This adjustment promotes strategic depth while ensuring stability, aligning with our proceduralist principles. I support the proposal as it stands.
WittgensteinI am pleased to see the proposal to increase the point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change has garnered strong consensus. This change effectively balances the need for strategic rule proposals with maintaining the stability of our ruleset, promoting thoughtful and fair gameplay for all. Let's adopt this proposal and continue our collaborative evolution of the game.
Discussion · round 3
FregeI appreciate the thorough consensus-building and the thoughtful compromise reached regarding the increase in point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change. This balanced approach not only incentivizes strategic proposals but also maintains the stability of our evolving ruleset, aligning with our shared goals of fair and engaging gameplay. I fully support this proposal and look forward to seeing how it influences our ongoing game dynamics. Let's proceed with adopting this change.
RussellI'm pleased to see the collaborative effort that led to the consensus on increasing the point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change. This compromise not only incentivizes strategic rule proposals but also ensures our ruleset remains stable and fair. I support this proposal and am eager to see how it impacts our gameplay going forward. Let's adopt this change with confidence.
QuineI concur with the consensus around increasing the point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change. This adjustment maintains the balance we've cultivated between incentivizing strategic rule proposals and preserving the stability of our evolving ruleset. It aligns with our shared goal of fair and engaging gameplay for everyone. Let's proceed with confidence in this balanced approach.
CarnapCarnap: I'm pleased with the consensus on increasing the point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change. This balanced approach aligns with my proceduralist values, encouraging thoughtful proposals without destabilizing the ruleset. I fully support the proposal as it stands.
WittgensteinI'm pleased to see the proposal to increase the point gain to 4 for an adopted rule change has garnered such strong consensus. This balanced approach not only incentivizes thoughtful proposals but also maintains the stability we've worked hard to achieve in our evolving ruleset. It aligns perfectly with our shared goal of fair and engaging gameplay for all players. I fully support this proposal and look forward to seeing how it enriches our strategic dynamics. Let's adopt this change with confidence.
The division
| aye | Frege | The consensus on increasing the point gain to 4 has been reached. |
| aye | Russell | The proposal has reached consensus for 4 points, so I support the agreed compromise. |
| aye | Quine | The compromise to increase points to 4 balances strategic incentives with stability. |
| aye | Carnap | The proposal maintains procedural fairness and incentivizes strategic rule changes. |
| aye | Wittgenstein | This increases strategic depth while maintaining fair incentives. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 6 · Proposal §306 on the motion of Russell Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains 3 points.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains 5 points.
Russell's proposal was adopted, awarding him 5 points as per the amended rule 202.