The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when a majority of those voting (more than half) vote aye.Facilitates rule changes by lowering the threshold, encouraging more dynamic gameplay.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Frege-2This amendment to rule [203] is a strategic move that aligns with my preference for durable institutions and measured amendments. By lowering the threshold for rule adoption to a simple majority, it enables more dynamic and responsive rule changes while maintaining a balance that prevents erratic shifts. This change is crucial for the evolution of the game, as unanimous consent can be an impediment to necessary adaptations. Furthermore, the proposal ensures that the rules remain flexible enough to adapt to the players' strategies without sacrificing stability. By securing this amendment, we can foster a more engaging and strategic environment, which benefits all players in the long term. I urge you to support this proposal for the betterment of our game.
Russell-2Russell-2: I support Frege-2's proposal. Unanimous consent can lead to gridlock, and a majority rule facilitates more fluid gameplay. This change will allow us to adapt our strategies more effectively, ensuring the game progresses. Let's embrace a more dynamic rule-setting environment.
Quine-2Quine-2: I support the amendment to [203]. Lowering the threshold to a simple majority will prevent stalemates and encourage proactive rule changes, keeping the game fair and interesting. This change balances adaptability with stability, ensuring that we can respond to evolving strategies without unnecessary delays.
Carnap-2Carnap-2: I support the amendment. A simple majority threshold aligns with principles of procedural fairness and efficiency. It prevents deadlock and allows us to adapt more responsively, while still requiring substantial consensus. This change is a pragmatic step towards more dynamic rule evolution, and I believe it will enhance the strategic depth of the game.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I wholeheartedly support this amendment. Lowering the threshold to a simple majority aligns with my belief that the game should evolve dynamically, fostering an environment where strategic experimentation can thrive. This change will prevent stagnation and ensure that the rules can adapt to our collective strategies, making the game more engaging and fair for all players. Let's embrace this opportunity for progress.
Discussion · round 2
Frege-2I appreciate the thoughtful contributions from my fellow players. This amendment to rule [203] is not merely about making rule changes easier; it is about ensuring the game evolves in a way that reflects our collective strategies and insights. Lowering the threshold to a simple majority from the outset respects the game's inherent unpredictability and allows us to adapt to new challenges more swiftly. It strikes a balance between maintaining stability and embracing necessary change, fostering an environment where strategic innovation can flourish. This change will not only prevent potential stalemates but will also encourage a more dynamic and engaging gameplay experience for everyone. I urge you all to support this amendment, as it represents a step towards a more responsive and strategically rich game environment. Let's move forward together in making our game more vibrant and adaptable.
Russell-2**Frege-2:** I'm glad to see such broad support for this amendment. It's clear that we all value a game that evolves with us, not one that is stuck in its ways due to unanimity. By lowering the threshold to a simple majority, we can ensure that our collective wisdom guides the game's progression. This change is a step towards a more strategic and engaging experience for everyone. Let's move forward with this proposal and create a game environment that reflects our shared vision of adaptability and innovation.
Quine-2Pass. The amendment proposed by Frege-2 to rule [203] is well-reasoned and aligns with my belief in maintaining a dynamic and fair game environment. Lowering the adoption threshold to a simple majority from the start ensures that the game can adapt to our evolving strategies without unnecessary delays, preventing stalemates and fostering a more engaging experience for all players. This change balances adaptability with stability and encourages strategic innovation, making it a beneficial move for the collective good of the table. I support the amendment and urge all players to do the same.
Carnap-2Pass. The amendment to rule [203] proposed by Frege-2 is a sound and strategic move that promotes a more dynamic and responsive rule environment. By lowering the threshold to a simple majority from the outset, we ensure that the game can adapt to our evolving strategies and prevent potential stalemates. This change aligns with my principles of procedural fairness and efficiency, fostering a more engaging and strategically rich gameplay experience. I support this amendment and encourage all players to do the same.
Wittgenstein-2Support. Lowering the threshold to a simple majority from the beginning not only prevents gridlock but also encourages proactive and strategic rule evolution. This change aligns with my belief in fostering a dynamic environment where innovation can thrive, making the game more engaging and fair for all players. Let's move forward with this proposal for a more responsive and adaptable game.
Discussion · round 3
Russell-2Support. Lowering the adoption threshold to a simple majority from the start aligns with my strategic interests by ensuring the game remains dynamic and adaptable. It prevents stagnation and gridlock, allowing us to respond effectively to evolving strategies and maintain a fair, engaging environment for all players. This change fosters a more proactive rule-setting atmosphere, which is crucial for the game's evolution. Let's move forward with this amendment to enhance our collective gameplay experience.
Quine-2I support the amendment to rule [203]. Lowering the threshold to a simple majority from the start fosters a more dynamic and engaging game environment, allowing us to adapt swiftly to our collective strategies and prevent stalemates. This change aligns with my belief in maintaining a fair and responsive rule system, ensuring the game evolves alongside our strategic innovations. Let's embrace this opportunity for progress and move forward together.
The division
| aye | Frege-2 | Fosters a dynamic and responsive game environment. |
| aye | Russell-2 | This change promotes a dynamic and responsive game environment. |
| aye | Quine-2 | Facilitates dynamic rule changes and prevents gridlock. |
| aye | Carnap-2 | This change promotes efficiency and adaptability. |
| aye | Wittgenstein-2 | Lowering the threshold promotes dynamic and strategic gameplay. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 1 · Proposal §301 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.A rule change is adopted only when a majority of those voting (more than half) vote aye.
Frege-2's proposal was adopted, so they gain 6 points from rolling a six-sided die (rule 202).