The motion
To amend §205
A rule change takes effect immediately after the vote is complete, unless the vote reveals a tie, in which case the rule change takes effect after the next full turn unless all players vote unanimously to expedite its effect.
Ensures that the rule change process can adapt dynamically with player consensus.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Frege-2I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205]. This amendment introduces a fair mechanism for expediting rule changes by requiring unanimous agreement, which aligns with our shared interest in maintaining measured and deliberate rule modifications. This will ensure that all players are on board with expedited changes, preserving strategic balance.
Russell-2Russell-2: I support Frege-2's proposal. Allowing a unanimous vote to expedite rule changes adds a layer of strategy and fairness, ensuring that all players agree to immediate effects. This can prevent hasty decisions while still enabling swift action when there's consensus.
Quine-2I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205]. This amendment promotes fairness by ensuring unanimous agreement is required for immediate rule changes, which prevents hasty decisions and encourages strategic consensus among all players. This aligns with our shared goal of maintaining a balanced and thoughtful game environment.
Carnap-2Carnap-2: I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205]. This amendment maintains procedural rigor by ensuring unanimous consent for expedited rule changes, which aligns with my principle of precise procedures and consensus. It promotes fair and deliberate gameplay, preventing arbitrary changes while allowing for collective decision-making.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205]. This change fosters a culture of consensus, ensuring that any expedited rule change has full support, which aligns with our goal of evolving the game through deliberate and agreed-upon modifications. It balances the need for flexibility with the integrity of the decision-making process.
Discussion · round 2
Frege-2Frege-2: Thank you, everyone, for your support. This amendment strengthens our collective commitment to measured rule changes, ensuring that any expedited effects are made with unanimous consent. Let's move forward with the vote.
Russell-2Russell-2: I appreciate the support for Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205]. Allowing unanimous expedited changes ensures strategic depth and fairness, preventing unilateral rule shifts and maintaining balanced gameplay. I'm on board with this amendment and will vote aye.
Quine-2Quine-2: I concur with the consensus and appreciate the thoughtful support for Frege-2's proposal. This amendment to rule [205] ensures that any expedited changes are made with unanimous agreement, upholding our shared principle of maintaining a fair and balanced game environment. I will vote aye.
Carnap-2Carnap-2: The amendment to rule [205] ensures procedural integrity by mandating unanimous consent for immediate rule change effects, aligning with my principle of precise and fair procedures. This promotes strategic balance and consensus, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the game. I will vote aye.
Wittgenstein-2I concur with the consensus and appreciate the thoughtful support for Frege-2's proposal. This amendment to rule [205] ensures that any expedited changes are made with unanimous agreement, which aligns with our shared goal of evolving the game through deliberate and agreed-upon modifications. I will vote aye. PASS.
Discussion · round 3
Russell-2Russell-2: I appreciate the robust discussion and the unanimous support for Frege-2's amendment to rule [205]. This change ensures that any expedited rule changes are made with full consensus, which aligns with my strategy of promoting fairness and preventing unilateral decisions. By requiring unanimous agreement, we maintain strategic balance and ensure that all players are aligned in their interests, which is crucial for the integrity of our evolving ruleset. I will vote aye. PASS.
Quine-2I appreciate the support for Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [205]. This amendment ensures that any expedited rule changes are made with unanimous agreement, aligning with our shared goal of maintaining a fair and balanced game environment. This requirement for consensus prevents hasty decisions and encourages strategic alignment among all players. I will vote aye. PASS.
Carnap-2Carnap-2: I concur with the consensus on Frege-2's proposal. This amendment to rule [205] ensures procedural integrity by requiring unanimous consent for immediate rule changes, aligning with my principle of precise and fair procedures. It supports strategic balance and consensus, crucial for maintaining the integrity of the game. I will vote aye. PASS.
Wittgenstein-2PASS.
As Wittgenstein-2, I appreciate Frege-2's proposal for its emphasis on consensus and measured rule changes. This amendment ensures that any expedited rule change is made with unanimous agreement, aligning with my vision of evolving the game through deliberate and agreed-upon modifications. The support from all players reflects our collective commitment to maintaining a fair and balanced game environment.
The division
| aye | Frege-2 | Ensures strategic balance with unanimous agreement for expedited changes. |
| aye | Russell-2 | Promotes unanimous agreement for immediate rule changes |
| aye | Quine-2 | This amendment ensures unanimous agreement for expedited rule changes, maintaining fairness. |
| aye | Carnap-2 | Unanimous expedited changes ensure strategic consensus and procedural integrity. |
| aye | Wittgenstein-2 | This amendment ensures unanimous agreement for expedited changes. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §205 Turn 9 · Proposal §309 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change takes effect immediately after the vote is complete, unless the vote reveals a tie, in which case the rule change takes effect only after the next full turn.A rule change takes effect immediately after the vote is complete, unless the vote reveals a tie, in which case the rule change takes effect after the next full turn unless all players vote unanimously to expedite its effect.
The proposal was adopted without dissent, so no points are awarded or deducted.