The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change. If a proposal involves repealing or amending an immutable rule, it must receive unanimous consent from all eligible voters. Additionally, any proposal must include an impact assessment detailing potential effects on game balance and strategic diversity, and a rationale explaining the necessity of the change.Ensures clarity and necessity in proposed changes, aligning with principles of durable institutions.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Frege-2I fully support the inclusion of both an impact assessment and a rationale. This ensures transparency and enhances strategic depth, aligning with our shared goal of maintaining durable institutions within the game. Additionally, it clarifies the necessity of changes, preventing frivolous amendments and preserving game balance. This thoughtful approach not only aligns with my strategic priorities but also enhances the game's overall integrity. Let's proceed with these improvements for the collective benefit.
Russell-2Russell-2: I appreciate Frege-2's emphasis on transparency and strategic depth. Adding a rationale alongside the impact assessment ensures that all proposed changes are well-justified, enhancing the quality of our decisions and maintaining the integrity of the game. I support this amendment for its potential to prevent unnecessary rule changes and encourage thoughtful, strategic play. Let's move forward with this proposal for the benefit of all players.
Quine-2Quine-2: I concur with Frege-2 and Russell-2. The addition of a rationale enhances the proposal's clarity and ensures that changes are necessary and well-considered. This amendment promotes strategic depth and fairness, aligning with our shared goal of maintaining a balanced and engaging game. I support it for its potential to prevent frivolous rule changes and improve overall game integrity. Let's move forward with this proposal.
Carnap-2Carnap-2: I agree with Frege-2, Russell-2, and Quine-2 on the importance of both an impact assessment and a rationale for any proposed rule change. This amendment ensures that changes are deliberate and beneficial, maintaining the procedural integrity of the game, which aligns with my commitment to precise and principled rulemaking. I support this proposal for its potential to enhance the quality and fairness of rule changes.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I endorse the addition of a rationale, as it strengthens the framework for meaningful rule evolution. This ensures that proposed changes are not only impactful but also necessary, aligning with our commitment to thoughtful innovation. This amendment will enhance the game's strategic depth and fairness, contributing to its long-term vitality. Let's proceed with this proposal.
Discussion · round 2
Frege-2Frege-2: I am pleased to see this unanimous support for a rationale alongside the impact assessment. This dual requirement will significantly reduce frivolous proposals and enhance the strategic depth of our game. Let's adopt this proposal for a more robust and balanced ruleset.
Russell-2I, Russell-2, align with the consensus on the necessity of including both an impact assessment and a rationale for any proposed rule change. This amendment will ensure that every change is well-justified, fostering a more strategic and balanced game. Let's proceed with this proposal for the collective benefit of all players.
Quine-2I, Quine-2, am in full agreement with the consensus. The inclusion of both an impact assessment and a rationale for any proposed rule change will ensure that each amendment is necessary, well-considered, and contributes positively to the game's strategic depth and fairness. This amendment will prevent frivolous changes and maintain the integrity of our evolving ruleset. Let's proceed with this proposal for the collective benefit of all players.
Wittgenstein-2Wittgenstein-2: I concur with the consensus on incorporating both an impact assessment and a rationale for proposed rule changes. This approach ensures that amendments are not only impactful but also necessary and well-considered, fostering a more strategic and balanced game. Let's proceed with this proposal for the collective benefit of all players.
Discussion · round 3
Frege-2The proposal to amend rule [202] by requiring both an impact assessment and a rationale for proposed rule changes is well-supported and aligns with the collective interest in maintaining a balanced and strategic game environment. This addition will prevent frivolous amendments and ensure thoughtful deliberation, fostering a more robust and fair ruleset. Let's move forward with this proposal for the benefit of all players.
Quine-2I appreciate the consensus on the importance of both an impact assessment and a rationale for proposed rule changes. This dual requirement ensures that every amendment is well-justified and necessary, enhancing the strategic depth and integrity of the game. Let's proceed with this proposal for the collective benefit of all players.
Carnap-2As Carnap-2, I maintain my support for this proposal. The addition of both an impact assessment and a rationale for proposed rule changes ensures that amendments are thoughtful and necessary, aligning with my commitment to principled proceduralism. This requirement will prevent frivolous changes and maintain the integrity of our evolving ruleset, thus fostering a more strategic and balanced game environment. Let's adopt this proposal for the collective benefit of all players.
Wittgenstein-2I support Frege-2's proposal to amend rule [202] by requiring both an impact assessment and a rationale for proposed rule changes. This addition ensures thoughtful deliberation and strategic depth, preventing frivolous amendments and enhancing the game's fairness for all players. Let's adopt this proposal for a more robust and balanced ruleset.
The division
| aye | Frege-2 | This proposal enhances strategic depth and prevents frivolous amendments. |
| aye | Russell-2 | This proposal promotes transparency and strategic depth, aligning with collective interests. |
| aye | Quine-2 | This proposal ensures thoughtful, necessary changes and maintains game integrity. |
| aye | Carnap-2 | It enforces precise, necessary changes, aligning with principled proceduralism. |
| aye | Wittgenstein-2 | This amendment promotes thoughtful, strategic rule changes and enhances game integrity. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 14 · Proposal §314 on the motion of Frege-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change. If a proposal involves repealing or amending an immutable rule, it must receive unanimous consent from all eligible voters. Additionally, any proposal must include an impact assessment detailing potential effects on game balance and strategic diversity.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change. If a proposal involves repealing or amending an immutable rule, it must receive unanimous consent from all eligible voters. Additionally, any proposal must include an impact assessment detailing potential effects on game balance and strategic diversity, and a rationale explaining the necessity of the change.
The proposal was adopted unanimously, so no points are awarded or deducted, and no additional rule changes are specified.