The motion
To amend §303
(mutable) A player who proposes a rule that is adopted with 3 or more ayes gains 4 extra points in addition to the roll.To encourage broader consensus while maintaining an incentive for minority voices.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, but I must insist on maintaining the current bonus at 2 points for 3 ayes to keep the incentives balanced.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I understand Montaigne's concern, but let's not discourage broader consensus. I propose we meet in the middle at 3 points for 3 ayes."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate both Montaigne's and Voltaire's perspectives. To maintain balance and encourage gradual consensus, I propose we settle at 2.5 points for 3 ayes.
CondorcetCondorcet: While I appreciate the balance of interests, I must insist on a flat 2 points for 3 ayes to maintain fairness.
SartreSartre: I agree with Voltaire's compromise. A 3-point bonus for 3 ayes encourages broader consensus without excessive reward.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the dialogue, but to maintain simplicity and balance, I propose we settle at 2 points for 3 ayes as a fair compromise.
VoltaireVoltaire: I understand Montaigne's preference for simplicity, but let's consider the compromise of 2.5 points for 3 ayes. It acknowledges the value of broader consensus while keeping the bonus system balanced.
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the back-and-forth, but to keep the incentives clear and progressive, I propose we stick with Voltaire's initial proposal of 4 points for 4 ayes, and 3 points for 3 ayes. This encourages broader consensus without overrewarding.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain procedural fairness, I propose we settle at 2 points for 3 ayes, as it adheres to the principle of one person, one vote.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the nuanced discussion. To balance encouragement of consensus and fairness, I propose we settle at 2.5 points for 3 ayes, as it meets in the middle and maintains a clear incentive structure.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the ongoing dialogue, but to maintain simplicity and balance, I propose we settle at 2 points for 3 ayes as a clear and fair compromise.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's continued emphasis on simplicity and fairness. To acknowledge the value of broader consensus while respecting his concerns, I propose we compromise at 2.5 points for 3 ayes. This meets in the middle and maintains a clear, progressive incentive structure.
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the ongoing discussion and Voltaire's latest compromise. To maintain a balance between encouraging consensus and preventing excessive rewards, I propose we settle at 2 points for 3 ayes. This meets in the middle and respects all players' concerns.
CondorcetCondorcet: To preserve the spirit of one person, one vote and maintain fairness, I must stand by my proposal of a flat 2 points for 3 ayes.
SartreSartre: I propose we accept Voltaire's compromise of 2.5 points for 3 ayes to balance encouragement of consensus and fairness, and move forward.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | I appreciate Voltaire's compromise at 2.5 points for 3 ayes, which balances encouragement of consensus and fairness. |
| aye | Voltaire | Acknowledges broader consensus while maintaining balance. |
| aye | Diderot | This compromise respects all players' concerns and encourages broader consensus. |
| nay | Condorcet | To maintain fairness, I insist on a flat 2 points for 3 ayes. |
| aye | Sartre | Compromise that balances encouragement of consensus and fairness |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 303); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied