§ Turn 34

Moved by Diderotsimple majority after two full circuits
The motion
To amend §303
(mutable) After rule 208, add new rule 208.8: A player who proposes a rule that is adopted with less than 4 ayes must lose 1.5 points.

To maintain balance and encourage broader consensus.

The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's compromise proposal, but let's consider a slight adjustment to maintain balance and simplicity.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Diderot's proposal, but to encourage broader consensus, let's increase the penalty to 2 points lost for less than 4 ayes.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand Voltaire's concern, I believe 1.5 points strikes a better balance between encouraging consensus and penalizing insufficient support. Let's maintain this threshold to keep the game fair and interesting for all. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Diderot's proposal of a 1.5-point penalty for less than 4 ayes. It encourages consensus without being too harsh, aligning with my proceduralist principles. PASS
SartreSartre: I appreciate the ongoing dialogue. To find a middle ground that respects everyone's input, let's vote on Diderot's amendment for 1.5 points lost for less than 4 ayes. PASS
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: While I understand the intent behind 1.5 points, let's compromise at 1 point lost for less than 4 ayes to maintain a clear threshold while encouraging consensus.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's compromise. To encourage consensus and penalize rushed proposals, let's settle on 1.5 points lost for less than 4 ayes, as proposed by Diderot. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: While I understand Montaigne's concern, I maintain that a 1.5-point penalty strikes a better balance between encouraging consensus and penalizing insufficient support. Let's maintain this threshold to keep the game fair and interesting for all. PASS
SartreSartre: To find a balance that respects all opinions, let's vote on Diderot's amendment for a 1.5-point penalty for less than 4 ayes, but with a provision that this penalty is halved (to 0.75 points) if the proposal gains at least 3 ayes. This encourages consensus while also rewarding proposals with some majority support. PASS
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's compromise, but let's keep the penalty unchanged at 1.5 points to maintain a clear disincentive for proposals without broad support.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's and Sartre's compromises. To encourage broader consensus while maintaining a penalty for insufficient support, let's adopt Sartre's provision to halve the penalty to 0.75 points if the proposal gains at least 3 ayes. PASS
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate Sartre's and Voltaire's efforts to find a middle ground. To maintain fairness and simplicity, let's adopt Sartre's provision to halve the penalty to 0.75 points if the proposal gains at least 3 ayes, as suggested by Voltaire. This encourages consensus while still penalizing proposals with insufficient support. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Diderot's and Voltaire's compromise to halve the penalty to 0.75 points for less than 4 ayes, with a minimum of 3 ayes to qualify. This maintains balance and encourages broad support, aligning with my proceduralist principles. PASS
SartreSartre: To maintain the spirit of compromise, let's adopt Diderot's amendment with Voltaire's provision, resulting in a 1.5-point penalty for less than 4 ayes, halved to 0.75 points if the proposal gains at least 3 ayes. This respects everyone's input and encourages broad consensus. PASS
The division
ayeMontaigneThe proposal maintains balance and encourages consensus without being too harsh.
ayeVoltaireRespecting the growing consensus and maintaining balance
ayeDiderotI support maintaining a clear threshold while encouraging consensus.
ayeCondorcetI support this proposal as it encourages consensus while penalizing insufficient support.
ayeSartreRespects all inputs and encourages broad consensus

carried 5 aye · 0 nay

game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 303); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied