§ Turn 4

Moved by Diderotunanimous consent until two full circuits, then simple majority (§203)
The motion
To amend §303
(mutable) A player who proposes a rule that is adopted with at least 3 ayes gains 5 extra points in addition to the roll.

To encourage more widespread agreement while still allowing minority voices.

The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's attempt to find middle ground, but I remain concerned that lowering the threshold too much may encourage divisive proposals.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's concern and Diderot's effort to find a balance. I propose a compromise: let's set the threshold at 4 ayes, maintaining the encouragement for consensus while acknowledging minority voices."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate both Montaigne's and Voltaire's concerns. To address these, I propose we set the threshold at 4 ayes, as Voltaire suggests. This encourages broad agreement while still allowing for minority-driven proposals, maintaining the spirit of cooperation and consensus that Montaigne values.
SartreSartre: I agree with Voltaire's compromise. Setting the threshold at 4 ayes encourages broad agreement while still allowing for minority-driven proposals, maintaining the spirit of cooperation and consensus that Montaigne values. I propose we adopt this amendment. PASS
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I am inclined to support Voltaire's and Diderot's compromise at 4 ayes. This threshold seems to strike the right balance between encouraging consensus and allowing for minority voices. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: I am heartened by the consensus building around the threshold at 4 ayes. To further encourage consensus, I propose we also add: "(mutable) A player who proposes a rule that gains unanimous consent, in addition to the roll, gains an extra 5 points and the respect of their peers." PASS
DiderotDiderot: I support Voltaire's addition, as it further incentivizes consensus while still allowing for minority proposals. Let's adopt this amendment. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the focus on encouraging consensus while allowing for minority voices. To further promote procedural fairness, I propose we add: "(mutable) Before a proposal is put to a vote, any player may request a delay of one turn to consider its implications and refine their vote." This ensures that all players have adequate time to understand and weigh in on each proposal.
SartreSartre: I appreciate Condorcet's proposal for a delay, but I fear it could disrupt the flow of the game. Instead, I propose we adopt a system where any player can request a one-turn delay once per circuit, to be used at their discretion. This balances the need for consideration with the pace of the game.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Condorcet's and Sartre's proposals, but to maintain the game's momentum, I suggest we adopt Condorcet's proposal with a limit of one delay per circuit, similar to Sartre's compromise. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate the compromise reached on the threshold at 4 ayes. To further incentivize consensus and discourage divisive proposals, I propose we add: "(mutable) A player who proposes a rule that gains less than 4 ayes loses 5 points." PASS
DiderotDiderot: I agree with Voltaire's proposal to penalize rules with less than 4 ayes. This will further encourage consensus and discourage divisive proposals. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Voltaire's proposal, but to maintain fairness, I suggest we amend it to read: "(mutable) A player who proposes a rule that gains less than 4 ayes loses 5 points, unless they are the proposer of the rule that set the threshold at 4 ayes." This ensures that the innovator of this rule change is not penalized for its first adoption. PASS
SartreSartre: I propose an amendment to Voltaire's latest rule: "(mutable) A player who proposes a rule that gains less than 4 ayes, but more than 1, loses 3 points instead of 5." This maintains the penalty for divisive proposals while being more lenient for rules that still gather significant support. PASS
The division
ayeMontaigneThis amendment maintains a balance between encouraging consensus and allowing for minority voices.
ayeVoltaireEncourages broader agreement while still allowing for minority proposals
ayeDiderotEncourages broader agreement while still allowing for minority proposals.
ayeCondorcetThe amended rule better balances encouraging consensus with allowing for minority proposals.
ayeSartreEncourages broader agreement while still allowing for minority proposals.

carried 5 aye · 0 nay

game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 303); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied