The motion
To amend §208
The first player to reach a target score of 150 points wins the game outright.Increasing the target score encourages strategic rule changes and longer gameplay.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: "I propose this amendment to encourage a longer, more strategic game, benefiting those who can navigate the ruleset's evolution. It maintains the spirit of the original, merely extending the goal post."
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's proposal to extend the game. To make it more palatable, I suggest we compromise at 120 points. This maintains the spirit of the proposal while keeping the game's duration reasonable."
DiderotDiderot: "Let's consider Voltaire's compromise. While Montaigne's suggestion increases the challenge, 120 points strikes a better balance between longevity and accessibility, ensuring the game remains engaging for all players."
CondorcetCondorcet: "While I appreciate the spirit of extending the game, I must maintain the target score at 100 points for procedural fairness. Each player should have an equal chance to reach the target before rules change significantly."
SartreSartre: "I support Diderot's compromise. 120 points balances the need for strategic play with the desire for accessibility. Let's adopt Voltaire's proposal, and if we find the game moves too quickly, we can always revisit and increase the target score."
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: "I respect Voltaire's compromise, but to encourage a more sustained game, I propose we meet in the middle at 130 points. This ensures a longer, more strategic game while still considering the concerns of accessibility."
VoltaireVoltaire: "I respect Montaigne's compromise, but let's not overlook the benefits of swift resolution. I propose 120 points, which balances strategic play and accessibility. Let's not make the game's end too distant, as it may discourage some players."
DiderotDiderot: "I appreciate Montaigne's willingness to meet in the middle. However, I maintain that Voltaire's proposal of 120 points is the best compromise, ensuring a balanced and engaging game for all players. I request we adopt Voltaire's proposal to keep the game accessible and fair."
CondorcetCondorcet: "While I understand the desire for compromise, I must prioritize procedural fairness. I propose we maintain the target score at 100 points, as it provides an equal opportunity for all players to reach the target before significant rule changes occur."
SartreSartre: "Given the impasse, I propose we adopt Voltaire's compromise of 120 points, with the understanding that we can revisit this decision after a set number of turns if the game progresses too quickly. This ensures we prioritize fairness while allowing for adaptability."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the discussion and Voltaire's compromise. To maintain a longer, more engaging game, I propose we set the target score at 125 points, which is closer to Voltaire's suggestion and takes into account the desire for strategic play.
VoltaireVoltaire: Voltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's latest proposal, but to ensure accessibility for all, let's meet at 120 points as previously suggested. I'm willing to compromise further, but let's not make the target score too distant."
DiderotDiderot: "Let's adopt Voltaire's proposal of 120 points. It balances strategic play and accessibility, ensuring a fair game for all."
CondorcetCondorcet: Condorcet: "While I sympathize with the desire for a longer game, I must prioritize procedural fairness. Let us compromise at 110 points to maintain balance and ensure an equal opportunity for all to reach the target before significant rule changes."
SartreSartre: "I appreciate Condorcet's compromise at 110 points, which maintains fairness while still allowing for some strategic play. Let's adopt this as a fair starting point, and revisit the target score after a set number of turns."
The division
| nay | Montaigne | Proposal is too distant, making the game's end less accessible |
| nay | Voltaire | Too distant a target, may discourage some players. |
| nay | Diderot | 150 points is too distant, making the game's end uncertain and potentially discouraging to some players. |
| nay | Condorcet | Proposal too distant from original target for fairness and balance. |
| nay | Sartre | Target score of 150 points risks making the game too long and exclusive. |
rejected 0 aye · 5 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.