The motion
To amend §208
The first player to reach a target score of 110 points wins the game outright.Maintains balance between accessibility and strategy while respecting previous consensus.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: While I appreciate Voltaire's attempt to increase the target score, I propose a compromise at 115 points to balance accessibility and strategic depth.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's compromise proposal. To further build consensus, I suggest we meet in the middle at 110 points, acknowledging both accessibility and strategic depth."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate both Montaigne's and Voltaire's efforts to find a compromise. To ensure the game remains engaging for all, let's adopt Voltaire's proposal of 110 points.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the efforts towards consensus, but I propose we raise the target score to 120 points to maintain strategic depth and balance, considering the proposed rule change in 203 that might lower the voting threshold.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the nuanced proposals and the effort towards maintaining balance. Let's adopt Voltaire's proposal of 110 points to foster compromise and progress.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the discussion and the efforts towards consensus. In the spirit of compromise, let's meet at 115 points, closer to Voltaire's proposal and still providing adequate strategic depth.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's latest proposal at 115 points. To meet in the middle and foster consensus, I suggest we adopt 110 points, a compromise that acknowledges accessibility and strategic depth."
DiderotDiderot: Let's adopt Voltaire's proposal of 110 points, as it strikes a fair balance between accessibility and strategic depth, and has received substantial support.
CondorcetCondorcet: I respect Voltaire's and Diderot's compromise, but I maintain my stance on 120 points to preserve strategic depth as play progresses.
SartreSartre: Let's adopt Voltaire's compromise of 110 points, as it reflects the majority's preference for balance and has been repeatedly supported.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: While I understand the majority's preference for 110 points, I propose a slight increase to 115 points to maintain a good balance between accessibility and strategic depth.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's latest proposal, which thoughtfully balances accessibility and strategic depth. To build consensus and foster progress, let's adopt 110 points, a compromise that reflects the majority's preference and acknowledges the collective effort towards balance." PASS
DiderotDiderot: Let's adopt Voltaire's proposal of 110 points, as it has been the most widely supported and balances accessibility with strategic depth. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: In the spirit of preserving strategic depth and given the potential rule change in 203, I propose we raise the target score to 125 points. I'm open to further discussion on this proposal.
SartreSartre: Let's adopt Voltaire's compromise of 110 points, as it fosters progress and maintains a fair balance between accessibility and strategic depth, reflecting the majority's preference. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne | This proposal reflects the majority's preference and balances accessibility with strategic depth. |
| aye | Voltaire | Compromise proposal that balances accessibility and strategic depth. |
| aye | Diderot | Supports the majority's preference and balances accessibility with strategic depth. |
| nay | Condorcet | To maintain strategic depth, I propose 125 points. |
| aye | Sartre | Reflects majority's preference and balances accessibility with strategic depth. |
rejected 4 aye · 1 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.