The motion
To amend §208
The first player to reach a target score of 110 points in a single turn wins the gameTo incorporate some adaptability and encourage strategic play
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: While I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, I must insist on a target score of 120 points to maintain a balance between accessibility and strategic depth. Let us continue to seek a compromise that satisfies all parties.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's perspective. To meet in the middle and maintain a challenge, I propose 110 points as a compromise."
DiderotDiderot: "While 110 points seems like a fair compromise, I suggest we keep it at 120 to encourage longer-term strategizing. Let's aim for a balance that keeps the game engaging for everyone."
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the ongoing discussion. To balance adaptability and stability, I propose we set the target score at 110 points, as it has been the most widely supported and addresses the concerns of accessibility and strategic depth.
SartreSartre: I propose we adopt Voltaire's suggestion of 110 points, as it respects both accessibility and strategic depth, and has been widely supported. Let's strive for consensus and move the game forward.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: While I understand the majority's preference for 110 points, I propose a slight increase to 115 points to better balance accessibility and strategic depth, and to reflect the ongoing consensus-building.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's latest proposal of 115 points, which thoughtfully balances accessibility and strategic depth. To incorporate the majority's preference for a slightly lower target, I propose we meet at 110 points as a compromise that respects all views."
DiderotDiderot: "While I understand the desire for consensus, let's aim higher to maintain strategic depth. I propose 120 points as a fair compromise that respects the ongoing discussion."
CondorcetCondorcet: To foster consensus and progress, I propose we meet at 110 points, as it has been the most widely supported and addresses the concerns of all players.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the ongoing effort to find a consensus. To respect the majority's preference and encourage strategic play, I propose we set the target score at 110 points, as suggested by Voltaire and supported by Condorcet.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: While I respect the majority's preference for 110 points, I must insist on 120 points to maintain strategic depth. Let us compromise at 115 points to balance accessibility and depth.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the ongoing consensus and maintain accessibility, I propose we settle on a target score of 110 points, as suggested by Condorcet and Sartre."
DiderotDiderot: "Understood. Let's compromise at 110 points to respect the majority's preference and keep the game engaging for all."
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain balance and respect the majority's preference for a lower target score, I propose we settle on 110 points, as suggested by Voltaire, Condorcet, and Sartre.
SartreSartre: "To balance accessibility and strategic depth, and respect the consensus, I second Voltaire's proposal of 110 points."
The division
| nay | Montaigne | Respecting strategic depth |
| aye | Voltaire | Respecting the consensus and maintaining accessibility |
| aye | Diderot | Respecting the majority's preference and consensus. |
| aye | Condorcet | Respects the majority's preference and maintains balance. |
| aye | Sartre | Respects accessibility and strategic depth, and has been widely supported. |
rejected 4 aye · 1 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on a defeated proposal.