The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds (2/3) of all eligible voters vote 'aye' until five full circuits of every player have passed, then it drops to a two-thirds (2/3) majority again.To maintain a high threshold for rule changes and encourage consensus throughout the game.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's proposal to extend the threshold to five full circuits, but to maintain the spirit of consensus and stability, I suggest we keep it at three full circuits as it stands now.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I understand Montaigne-2's concern for stability, but extending the threshold to five circuits encourages more strategic play and prevents rushed changes."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate the discussion. To balance strategy and longevity, I propose we compromise at four full circuits before dropping to a simple majority.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the discussion, but as a proceduralist, I must insist on maintaining the three full circuits as stated in rule 203. It ensures a robust consensus while still allowing for change.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Considering the game's evolution and the value of strategic play, let's meet in the middle at four full circuits, respecting all views.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the longevity of the game and the importance of gradual change, I propose we settle on four full circuits as a compromise that respects all views.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "While I respect the compromises suggested, I maintain that five full circuits best balances strategic play and stability. I'm open to a counteroffer."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate the ongoing discussion. To maintain a balance between strategic play and stability, I propose we settle on four full circuits as a compromise, and to encourage debate, let's also introduce a requirement for a 24-hour cooling-off period before re-proposing a defeated change.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I understand the desire for strategic play, the principle of three full circuits ensures a robust consensus without stifling change. I propose we maintain the current rule as it stands.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: In the spirit of compromise and respecting all views, I propose we settle on four full circuits as the threshold before dropping to a simple majority, and adopt Diderot-2's suggestion for a 24-hour cooling-off period to encourage thoughtful debate.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the current proposal and the ongoing discussion, I propose we amend the rule to require a four-thirds (4/3) majority until five full circuits have passed, then it drops to a simple majority. This maintains a high threshold for early changes while allowing for gradual evolution.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate the compromises suggested, but to truly encourage strategic play and prevent hasty decisions, I insist on maintaining the proposal for five full circuits before shifting to a two-thirds majority."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's insistence, but to ensure the game's longevity, I propose we settle on four full circuits, meeting in the middle and respecting all views.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: In the interest of preserving the stability of our consensus-based game, I must insist on maintaining the threshold at three full circuits. However, to encourage more thoughtful debate, I propose adding a requirement for a 24-hour cooling-off period before re-proposing a defeated change, as suggested by Diderot-2.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Considering the current proposal and the ongoing discussion, I propose we amend the rule to require a four-fifths (4/5) majority until five full circuits have passed, then it drops to a two-thirds (2/3) majority. This respects all views and encourages strategic play while maintaining stability.
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | To maintain stability and gradual change, I suggest keeping the threshold at three full circuits. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Five full circuits best balances strategic play and stability. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | To maintain stability and longevity, four full circuits is a more balanced compromise. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Maintaining three full circuits ensures robust consensus without hindering change. |
| nay | Sartre-2 | To maintain stability and gradual evolution, four full circuits is a more balanced compromise. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.