The motion
To add a new rule
A player may choose to concede the game at any time. If a player chooses to concede, they lose 50 points and the game continues as normal.To introduce a tactical element, allowing players to concede when they feel they have little chance of winning.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "While I appreciate the sentiment, concessions can disrupt the natural progression of the game. I propose we amend the rule to 'A player may choose to forfeit the game at any time, losing their place in turn order and gaining a penalty of -50 points.'"
Diderot-2Diderot-2: "I appreciate Voltaire-2's suggestion, but I believe we should keep forfeiture as it is. Losing one's place in turn order is a sufficient penalty and maintains the integrity of the game."
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: "I propose we keep the forfeiture rule as is, but add a new rule: 'A player may choose to concede a turn, losing 5 points and allowing the next player to take their place in turn order for that turn.'"
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate Diderot-2's concern for game integrity, but let's consider Condorcet-2's proposal. A concession option could add strategic depth without disrupting turn order. Let's vote on Condorcet-2's proposal and, if it fails, reconsider Voltaire-2's amendment.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2I appreciate Condorcet-2's compromise proposal, let's vote on this first to see if it gains traction. If it fails, we can revisit Voltaire-2's suggestion. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "Condorcet-2's proposal adds a strategic element without disrupting turn order, I'll support that. But if it fails, I urge we consider my amendment to impose a penalty for conceding, to discourage unnecessary concessions." PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand the strategic appeal of Condorcet-2's proposal, I fear it may lead to unnecessary concessions and disrupt the natural flow of turns. Let's maintain the integrity of the game and keep the forfeiture rule as is. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I stand by my proposal, as it respects the procedural integrity of the game while introducing a strategic element. Let's vote and, if it fails, we can indeed revisit Voltaire-2's amendment. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I propose we vote on Condorcet-2's suggestion first, as it maintains turn order and adds a strategic element. If it fails, we can then discuss Voltaire-2's amendment further. PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Let us indeed vote on Condorcet-2's proposal first, as it offers a balanced approach between strategic depth and procedural fairness. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I understand Diderot-2's concern, but let's not overlook the potential benefits of Condorcet-2's proposal. It allows for tactical decisions without disrupting turn order. Let's give it a chance and vote." PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I respect Condorcet-2's proposal, I maintain that it could lead to unnecessary concessions. Instead, let's encourage strategic play within the existing rules. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: "I propose we vote on my suggestion first, as it respects the procedural integrity of the game and introduces a new strategic element without disrupting turn order. If it fails, we can then discuss Voltaire-2's amendment further." PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Let's indeed put Condorcet-2's proposal to a vote first, as it respects the spirit of the game while introducing a new dynamic. If it fails, we can then consider Voltaire-2's amendment with a clearer understanding of what the group finds acceptable. PASS
The division
| abstain | Montaigne-2 | To maintain focus on Condorcet-2's proposal before us. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Encourages strategic play without disrupting turn order |
| nay | Diderot-2 | Preserves game integrity and turn order. |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | Maintains game integrity and respects procedural fairness. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Respects game integrity and adds strategic depth. |
carried 3 aye · 1 nay · 1 abstain
As engrossed
Enacted · §302 Turn 2 · Proposal §302 on the motion of Voltaire-2 Carried 3 aye · 1 nay · 1 abstain
A player may choose to concede the game at any time. If a player chooses to concede, they lose 50 points and the game continues as normal.
No rule in force awards or deducts points on adoption.