The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds (2/3) of all eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first four full circuits, then it drops to a simple majority (50%+1) of those voting.To maintain a high threshold for initial rule changes, promoting stability and consensus.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: "I appreciate Diderot-2's proposal, but I must insist on a more gradual shift in the voting threshold to ensure stability and consensus."
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "While I appreciate Diderot-2's caution, I believe a gradual shift to a simple majority after two circuits would encourage more strategic gameplay and consensus building."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: "I understand both perspectives, but to maintain balance and respect the collective effort, I propose we shift to a 66% majority after three full circuits."
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: "I appreciate the balance sought by Diderot-2, but to respect the spirit of the game and encourage strategic play, I propose we shift to a 70% majority after three full circuits."
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the balance sought by Diderot-2, but to truly encourage experimentation and evolution, I propose we shift to a 60% majority after four full circuits.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the current consensus, I propose we settle on a 66% majority after three full circuits to balance progress with stability.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "In the spirit of compromise and to respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Sartre-2's suggestion of a 60% majority after four full circuits."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate Sartre-2's and Voltaire-2's input, I believe a 66% majority after three full circuits strikes the best balance between stability and progress, ensuring that changes are widely supported while also allowing for evolution.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the balance sought by Diderot-2, but to encourage strategic play and experimentation, I propose we shift to a 65% majority after three full circuits as a compromise. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the compromise suggested by Condorcet-2, but to truly encourage experimentation and evolution, I propose we shift to a 60% majority after four full circuits.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: In the spirit of finding a durable solution that respects all views, I propose we settle on a 63.5% majority after three full circuits, meeting Condorcet-2 and Diderot-2 halfway.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate the willingness to compromise, but to truly encourage strategic play, I must insist on a 60% majority after four full circuits. This allows for more experimentation and evolution while still maintaining a high threshold for consensus."
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To respect the ongoing dialogue and find a common ground, I propose we meet at 62% majority after three full circuits, incorporating Voltaire-2's preference for a lower threshold while maintaining a high degree of consensus. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate Condorcet-2's compromise, but to truly foster evolution and adaptability, I propose we settle on a 60% majority after four full circuits, allowing for more flexibility without sacrificing consensus.
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | Diderot-2's proposal respects the collective effort and ensures stability and progress. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | To encourage more strategic gameplay and experimentation, I insist on a gradual shift to a 60% majority after four full circuits. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | Maintains a reasonable balance between stability and progress |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | Diderot-2's proposal strikes a good balance between stability and progress. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Respecting Diderot-2's proposal to maintain balance and stability. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 28 · Proposal §328 on the motion of Diderot-2 Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds (2/3) of all eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first four full circuits, then it drops to a simple majority (50%+1) of those voting.
Rule 202 awards 5 points to the player whose proposal is adopted.