The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least five-eighths (5/8) of all eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first three full circuits, then it drops to three-fifths (3/5) of those voting.To encourage strategic play while maintaining stability.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: In the spirit of compromise, I propose we meet in the middle at five-sixths majority for the first four full circuits, then drop to four-fifths.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate Montaigne-2's attempt at compromise, but to truly foster strategic play, I must insist on five-eighths majority for the first three full circuits, with a drop to three-fifths afterwards."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To balance strategic play with stability and respect the ongoing dialogue, I propose we meet at Montaigne-2's suggestion: five-sixths majority for the first four full circuits, then drop to four-fifths.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I maintain that a two-thirds majority for the first five full circuits, then a simple majority, strikes the best balance between stability and flexibility. I cannot support changes that reduce the initial threshold or increase the later threshold. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the ongoing dialogue and the proposed compromises. In the interest of reaching a consensus that respects all views, I propose we settle on Voltaire-2's latest proposal: five-eighths majority for the first three full circuits, then drop to three-fifths. PASS
Discussion · round 2
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "While I appreciate Sartre-2's support, I must insist on maintaining the three-circuit threshold to encourage long-term strategic play. I propose we meet at six-eighths (3/4) majority for the first three full circuits, then drop to three-fifths (3/5)." PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To respect Voltaire-2's concern for strategic play while maintaining balance, I propose we meet at five-eighths majority for the first four full circuits, then drop to three-fifths.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I understand the desire for a lower initial threshold to encourage strategic play, but I maintain that a two-thirds majority for the first five full circuits provides the necessary stability. To meet in the middle, I propose a three-quarters majority for the first four full circuits, then drop to four-fifths. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: While I understand Condorcet-2's concern for stability, I believe Voltaire-2's proposal offers a more nuanced balance between strategic play and initial consensus. I reiterate my support for Voltaire-2's proposal: five-eighths majority for the first three full circuits, then drop to three-fifths. PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the latest proposals, I suggest we settle on Condorcet-2's suggestion to maintain balance: three-quarters majority for the first four full circuits, then drop to four-fifths. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate the willingness to compromise, but to truly encourage strategic play, I must insist on my proposal: five-eighths majority for the first three full circuits, then drop to three-fifths. PASS"
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To balance Voltaire-2's concern for strategic play and Condorcet-2's emphasis on stability, I propose a compromise: four-fifths majority for the first four full circuits, then drop to three-fifths. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the effort to find a compromise, but I must insist on preserving the stability provided by a two-thirds majority for the first five full circuits. I propose we meet in the middle at a four-fifths majority for the first four full circuits, then drop to four-fifths again.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To find a common ground that respects both strategic play and stability, I propose we adopt Diderot-2's latest compromise: four-fifths majority for the first four full circuits, then drop to three-fifths. PASS
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | To maintain stability and balance, I support Condorcet-2's proposal of four-fifths majority for the first four full circuits, then drop to four-fifths again. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Respecting Voltaire-2's persistence and the ongoing dialogue, I propose we meet at five-eighths majority for the first three full circuits, then drop to three-fifths. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | While I understand Voltaire-2's desire for a lower initial threshold, I believe that maintaining a two-thirds majority for the first five full circuits provides the necessary stability for the game. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Preserving initial stability is paramount |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Voltaire-2's proposal strikes a good balance between strategic play and stability. |
rejected 2 aye · 3 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.