The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least five-eighths (5/8) of all eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first seven full circuits, then it drops to a simple majority (50%+1) of those voting.To further encourage strategic play while maintaining stability
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I propose a slight adjustment to the voting threshold to encourage more strategic play and consensus building. Five-eighths majority for seven full circuits, then a simple majority, would better balance progress and stability."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate Voltaire-2's proposal, seven circuits with a 62.5% majority may hinder progress. I propose a compromise: five circuits at 66.67% (2/3), then a simple majority. This maintains balance and encourages strategic play while allowing for progress.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the spirit of compromise, but maintaining the current voting rule, with 2/3 majority for the first five circuits, balances progress with stability effectively. Let's not overcomplicate matters. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: While Condorcet-2's proposal maintains balance, it overlooks the opportunity for increased strategic play that Voltaire-2 and Diderot-2's proposals offer. I propose a compromise: six circuits at 66.67% (2/3), then a simple majority. This balances progress, stability, and strategic play.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the ongoing dialogue and the proposed compromises. In the interest of finding a durable solution that respects all views, I propose we settle on Sartre-2's suggestion: six circuits at two-thirds majority, then a simple majority. This balances the need for progress with the value of strategic play and stable rules.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "While I appreciate the compromises suggested, I must insist on seven full circuits with a 62.5% majority to truly foster long-term strategic play and consensus."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: Considering the collective effort and the ongoing dialogue, I propose we meet at five circuits with a 66.67% (2/3) majority, then a simple majority. This respects Voltaire-2's concern for strategic play while maintaining balance and allowing for progress.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: Condorcet-2: To maintain clarity and balance, let's settle on Condorcet-2's suggestion: five circuits at two-thirds majority, then a simple majority. This respects all views while keeping the rules clear and easy to follow. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: While Condorcet-2's proposal maintains balance, it doesn't fully encourage strategic play as Voltaire-2 and Diderot-2's proposals aim to do. I propose we meet in the middle at Voltaire-2's latest proposal: seven circuits at 62.5% majority, then a simple majority. This balances progress, stability, and strategic play effectively.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: To balance Voltaire-2's emphasis on strategic play and Diderot-2's concern for progress, I propose a compromise: six circuits at a 66.67% (2/3) majority, then a simple majority. This should satisfy everyone's goals.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "Considering the latest proposals, I see a willingness to compromise. I propose we meet in the middle at six circuits with a 66.67% majority, then a simple majority. This respects the need for progress and stability while encouraging strategic play." PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To preserve procedural clarity and balance, I maintain my proposal of five circuits at two-thirds majority, followed by a simple majority.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: In the spirit of compromise, let's meet at Voltaire-2's latest proposal: six circuits at 66.67% (2/3) majority, then a simple majority. This balances progress, stability, and strategic play effectively. PASS
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | To maintain stability and balance, I prefer Condorcet-2's suggestion of five circuits at two-thirds majority. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | To maintain balance and progress, six circuits at two-thirds majority is sufficient. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | Respects strategic play but may hinder progress. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Five-eighths majority for seven circuits is excessive and hinders progress. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Balances progress, stability, and strategic play. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.